Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(j-s): Text and handling of modal on subpoena screen #16057

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 19, 2024

Conversation

unakb
Copy link
Member

@unakb unakb commented Sep 18, 2024

Fyrirkall módall - uppfærður texti

What

Changed text in subpoena modal and changed handling of update and notification

Why

So that we don't send the update until the user has acknowledged that he wants to send a subpoena to the defendant

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated modal dialogs for subpoenas to improve clarity and user experience.
    • Added new options for sending subpoenas and canceling actions.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Streamlined notification and navigation logic to ensure notifications are sent correctly.
  • Refactor

    • Simplified modal title and text formatting for better user understanding.

@unakb unakb requested a review from a team as a code owner September 18, 2024 13:45
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 18, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces updates to the Subpoena.strings.ts and Subpoena.tsx files within the judicial system application. It modifies modal dialog text and identifiers for subpoenas, enhances notification logic, and streamlines navigation flow after sending notifications. These changes aim to improve user interface clarity and the efficiency of user interactions related to subpoenas.

Changes

Files Change Summary
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Subpoena/Subpoena.strings.ts Updated modal dialog identifiers and messages for subpoenas, added new text entries for clarity.
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Subpoena/Subpoena.tsx Modified notification sending logic, streamlined navigation after notifications, and simplified modal formatting.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

automerge

Suggested reviewers

  • oddsson

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 18, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 12 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 36.67%. Comparing base (9038301) to head (aff10b0).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...src/routes/Court/Indictments/Subpoena/Subpoena.tsx 0.00% 12 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #16057      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   36.66%   36.67%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        6748     6737      -11     
  Lines      138729   138464     -265     
  Branches    39404    39382      -22     
==========================================
- Hits        50862    50781      -81     
+ Misses      87867    87683     -184     
Flag Coverage Δ
air-discount-scheme-web 0.00% <ø> (ø)
api 3.39% <ø> (ø)
application-api-files 57.59% <ø> (ø)
application-core 71.29% <ø> (-0.25%) ⬇️
application-system-api 41.51% <ø> (ø)
application-template-api-modules 23.45% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
application-templates-accident-notification 22.14% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-car-recycling 3.12% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-criminal-record 26.63% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-driving-license 18.63% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-estate 12.34% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-example-payment 25.41% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-financial-aid 14.34% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-general-petition 23.68% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-health-insurance 26.62% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-inheritance-report 6.45% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-marriage-conditions 15.23% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-mortgage-certificate 43.96% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-parental-leave 30.15% <ø> (ø)
application-types 6.71% <ø> (ø)
application-ui-components 1.28% <ø> (ø)
application-ui-shell 21.29% <ø> (ø)
auth-react 22.80% <ø> (ø)
clients-charge-fjs-v2 24.11% <ø> (ø)
contentful-apps 5.76% <ø> (ø)
financial-aid-backend 56.52% <ø> (ø)
financial-aid-shared 19.03% <ø> (ø)
island-ui-core 28.57% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-web 28.66% <0.00%> (ø)
portals-admin-regulations-admin 1.95% <ø> (ø)
portals-core 16.17% <ø> (ø)
services-auth-personal-representative 47.94% <ø> (ø)
shared-components 27.68% <ø> (ø)
shared-form-fields 31.61% <ø> (ø)
web 1.85% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...tes/Court/Indictments/Subpoena/Subpoena.strings.ts 0.00% <ø> (ø)
...src/routes/Court/Indictments/Subpoena/Subpoena.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

... and 43 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9038301...aff10b0. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c9a363e and 1628b74.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Subpoena/Subpoena.strings.ts (1 hunks)
  • apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Subpoena/Subpoena.tsx (3 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (2)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Subpoena/Subpoena.strings.ts (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Subpoena/Subpoena.tsx (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
Additional comments not posted (6)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Subpoena/Subpoena.strings.ts (2)

27-32: LGTM

The addition of modalText provides clearer communication in the modal dialog. The identifier and default message are well-defined, enhancing user experience by making the actions more understandable.


39-44: LGTM

The introduction of modalSecondaryButtonText is appropriate and enhances the modal's functionality by providing a clear option to cancel the action. The identifiers and default messages are consistent and well-defined.

apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Subpoena/Subpoena.tsx (4)

84-89: LGTM

The use of Promise.all to handle multiple asynchronous operations ensures that all necessary updates are completed before navigation occurs. The error handling appropriately checks for any failed promises and prevents navigation if any operation fails.


94-99: Verify Dependency Array Completeness

In the handleNavigationTo useCallback, ensure that all dependencies used within the function are included in the dependency array. It appears that all relevant dependencies are present, which helps prevent unnecessary re-renders and maintains optimal performance.


172-176: LGTM

The navigation logic has been correctly adjusted to account for the arraignment status. Navigating directly when the arraignment is done enhances user experience by streamlining the workflow.


188-197: Ensure Consistency in Modal Configuration

The Modal component is correctly configured with the updated string identifiers and event handlers. The use of formatMessage with the new identifiers aligns with internationalization best practices. Confirm that the handleNavigationTo and setNavigateTo functions effectively manage the navigation flow as intended.

@datadog-island-is
Copy link

datadog-island-is bot commented Sep 18, 2024

Datadog Report

All test runs 62b1bc2 🔗

34 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 33 Passed
🔻 Test Sessions change in coverage: 1 decreased (-0.1%), 145 no change

Test Services
This report shows up to 10 services
Service Name Failed Known Flaky New Flaky Passed Skipped Total Time Code Coverage Change Test Service View
air-discount-scheme-web 0 0 0 2 0 7.94s 1 no change Link
api 0 0 0 4 0 3.01s 1 no change Link
application-api-files 0 0 0 12 0 6.43s 1 no change Link
application-core 0 0 0 90 0 20.33s 1 decreased (-0.1%) Link
application-system-api 0 0 0 111 2 3m 26.63s 1 no change Link
application-template-api-modules 0 0 0 109 0 1m 49.37s 1 no change Link
application-templates-accident-notification 0 0 0 98 0 18.65s 1 no change Link
application-templates-criminal-record 0 0 0 2 0 11.88s 1 no change Link
application-templates-driving-license 0 0 0 13 0 16.49s 1 no change Link
application-templates-example-payment 0 0 0 2 0 11.36s 1 no change Link

🔻 Code Coverage Decreases vs Default Branch (1)

  • application-core - jest 79.36% (-0.1%) - Details

@oddsson oddsson added the automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass label Sep 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants