Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(j-s): Hide the resend indictment button #15994

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 13, 2024
Merged

chore(j-s): Hide the resend indictment button #15994

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 13, 2024

Conversation

oddsson
Copy link
Member

@oddsson oddsson commented Sep 13, 2024

Hide the resend indictment button

Asana

What

Hide the resend indictment button

Why

This feature is no longer wanted. We do however plan on repurposing it later on so we decided to hold on to the functionality.

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Removed the option to return an indictment from the Indictment Overview interface.
  • Impact

    • This change modifies the user interface and limits the available actions for users interacting with the indictment overview.

@oddsson oddsson requested a review from a team as a code owner September 13, 2024 10:18
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 13, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve the temporary removal of the return indictment feature from the IndictmentOverview component in the Overview.tsx file. The associated action button's functionality has been commented out, including its text, color scheme, disabled state, and click handler. This modification affects the user interface by eliminating the option to return an indictment while preserving the underlying code for potential future use.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx Removed action button functionality related to returning indictments.

Possibly related PRs


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 13, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 36.84%. Comparing base (f257ea7) to head (bb16b52).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #15994      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   36.84%   36.84%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        6718     6718              
  Lines      137733   137728       -5     
  Branches    39159    39159              
==========================================
- Hits        50753    50750       -3     
+ Misses      86980    86978       -2     
Flag Coverage Δ
air-discount-scheme-web 0.00% <ø> (ø)
api 3.39% <ø> (ø)
application-api-files 57.46% <ø> (ø)
application-core 72.00% <ø> (-0.34%) ⬇️
application-system-api 41.67% <ø> (ø)
application-template-api-modules 23.44% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-accident-notification 22.26% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-car-recycling 3.12% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-criminal-record 26.96% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-driving-license 18.75% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-estate 12.55% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-example-payment 25.72% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-financial-aid 14.39% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-general-petition 23.95% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-health-insurance 26.88% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-inheritance-report 6.45% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-marriage-conditions 15.35% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-mortgage-certificate 44.15% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-parental-leave 29.31% <ø> (ø)
application-types 6.74% <ø> (ø)
application-ui-components 1.52% <ø> (ø)
application-ui-shell 21.74% <ø> (ø)
clients-charge-fjs-v2 24.11% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-web 28.71% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
web 1.85% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...src/routes/Court/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx 0.00% <ø> (ø)

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f257ea7...bb16b52. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx (1)

144-152: Looks good! The commented out code effectively disables the return indictment feature while retaining the functionality for future use.

The multi-line comments provide clear context about the reason for the change and the potential future plans. This approach ensures that the code remains readable and maintainable.

To further enhance the clarity and maintainability, consider the following suggestions:

  1. Add a TODO comment to track the future work required to reintroduce the feature. This will make it easier to identify and plan the necessary changes when the time comes.
  2. If the feature is expected to be reintroduced in the near future, consider using a feature flag instead of commenting out the code. This will allow for easier toggling of the feature without modifying the code.

Overall, the changes effectively address the current requirements while keeping the door open for future enhancements.

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b484a25 and 7ad2275.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."

@datadog-island-is
Copy link

datadog-island-is bot commented Sep 13, 2024

Datadog Report

All test runs dcec632 🔗

22 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 22 Passed
🔻 Test Sessions change in coverage: 1 decreased (-0.21%), 90 no change

Test Services
This report shows up to 10 services
Service Name Failed Known Flaky New Flaky Passed Skipped Total Time Code Coverage Change Test Service View
air-discount-scheme-web 0 0 0 2 0 8.79s 1 no change Link
api 0 0 0 4 0 3.26s 1 no change Link
application-api-files 0 0 0 12 0 6.99s 1 no change Link
application-core 0 0 0 90 0 21.34s 1 decreased (-0.21%) Link
application-system-api 0 0 0 111 2 3m 7.35s 1 no change Link
application-template-api-modules 0 0 0 109 0 1m 58.11s 1 no change Link
application-templates-accident-notification 0 0 0 98 0 18.62s 1 no change Link
application-templates-criminal-record 0 0 0 2 0 11.48s 1 no change Link
application-templates-driving-license 0 0 0 13 0 17.74s 1 no change Link
application-templates-example-payment 0 0 0 2 0 12.96s 1 no change Link

🔻 Code Coverage Decreases vs Default Branch (1)

  • application-core - jest 79.46% (-0.21%) - Details

@gudjong gudjong added the automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass label Sep 13, 2024
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit a811680 into main Sep 13, 2024
87 checks passed
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the j-s/hide-resent branch September 13, 2024 14:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants