feat(contentful-apps): Team member filter tags field

[RunarVestmann]

Team member filter tags field

What

• It only makes sense to tag team members with tags that are available in the team list search filter (previously you could select any tag)

Why

• We have more control in the CMS now and simplify the workflow of adding team members in the cms

Screenshots / Gifs

Before

After

Checklist:

• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• My changes generate no new warnings
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• Formatting passes locally with my changes
• I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features
  • Introduced a new component for filtering team members using tags in the Contentful application.
  • Users can select or deselect tags via checkboxes, enhancing the filtering process.
  • Improved user experience with a loading spinner and organized tag group display.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new React component, TeamMemberFilterTagsField, in a Contentful application. This component allows users to filter team members by selecting tags through checkboxes. It fetches tag groups and tags using the Contentful Management API, manages local state for loading and selected tags, and implements a debouncing mechanism for efficient updates. The UI includes a loading spinner and a structured display of tags, enhancing the functionality for filtering team members.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
apps/contentful-apps/pages/fields/team-member-filter-tags-field.tsx	Added a new React component for filtering team members by tags, utilizing Contentful Management API.

Possibly related PRs

• feat(web): Team List - Display email, phone and tags for team members  #15947: Enhances the Team List component by adding tags for team members, related to the filtering functionality.
• feat(web): Team List - Move frontend logic to the backend #15965: Modifies the GraphQL query to include a new field for tag groups, aligning with the tag management features.
• feat(web): Generic List - UX improvements #15983: Updates the TeamListSlice to improve loading state management, relevant to user experience improvements in tag filtering.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 62 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 36.83%. Comparing base (94f993e) to head (0ada394).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...pps/pages/fields/team-member-filter-tags-field.tsx	0.00%	62 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #16006      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   36.84%   36.83%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files        6718     6719       +1     
  Lines      137732   137793      +61     
  Branches    39159    39171      +12     
==========================================
  Hits        50753    50753              
- Misses      86979    87040      +61     

Flag	Coverage Δ
contentful-apps	5.89% <0.00%> (-0.16%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...pps/pages/fields/team-member-filter-tags-field.tsx	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 94f993e...0ada394. Read the comment docs.

[datadog-island-is]

Datadog Report

All test runs b6c5716 🔗

✅ 21 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 21 Passed
🔻 Test Sessions change in coverage: 3 decreased, 88 no change

Test Services

This report shows up to 10 services

Service Name	Failed	Known Flaky	New Flaky	Passed	Skipped	Total Time	Code Coverage Change	Test Service View
air-discount-scheme-web	0	0	0	2	0	8.88s	1 no change	Link
api	0	0	0	4	0	3.03s	1 no change	Link
application-api-files	0	0	0	12	0	6.28s	1 no change	Link
application-core	0	0	0	90	0	20.32s	1 decreased (-0.62%)	Link
application-system-api	0	0	0	111	2	3m 42.63s	1 no change	Link
application-template-api-modules	0	0	0	109	0	1m 53.15s	1 no change	Link
application-templates-accident-notification	0	0	0	98	0	20.42s	1 no change	Link
application-templates-criminal-record	0	0	0	2	0	11.2s	1 no change	Link
application-templates-driving-license	0	0	0	13	0	18.17s	1 no change	Link
application-templates-example-payment	0	0	0	2	0	13.03s	1 no change	Link

🔻 Code Coverage Decreases vs Default Branch (3)

• application-core - jest 79.05% (-0.62%) - Details
• contentful-apps - jest 5.11% (-0.15%) - Details
• application-templates-parental-leave - jest 34.31% (-0.1%) - Details