feat(j-s): Confirmed court records #15921
Conversation
…is into j-s/confirmed-ruling
… into j-s/confirmed-court-records
WalkthroughThis pull request updates the functionality for generating PDF documents related to legal case confirmations, specifically for indictments, rulings, and court records. It introduces a new type for handling case file categories, modifies the PDF generation logic to improve clarity and maintainability, and adds a new function for court record confirmations. The changes enhance error handling and streamline the process of confirming documents based on specific case file categories and conditions. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml Files selected for processing (2)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Additional context usedPath-based instructions (1)
Additional comments not posted (6)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/file/file.service.ts (1)
Line range hint
185-276: Approve changes and suggest enhanced logging.The modifications in
FileServiceenhance the handling of PDF creation based on case file categories and conditions. Consider adding more detailed logging for the new conditional branches to aid in debugging and maintenance, especially around the PDF generation process.
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/formatters/confirmedPdf.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/formatters/index.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/file/file.service.ts (4 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (3)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/formatters/index.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/formatters/confirmedPdf.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/file/file.service.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
Additional comments not posted (1)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/formatters/index.ts (1)
37-37: Confirm renaming and verify references.The renaming of
createConfirmedIndictmenttocreateConfirmedPdfsuggests a broader scope for the function. Ensure that all references to the old function name are updated across the project to maintain consistency.Verification successful
Renaming Verified Successfully
All references to
createConfirmedIndictmenthave been updated tocreateConfirmedPdfacross the codebase. No occurrences of the old function name were found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all references to the old function name have been updated. # Test: Search for the old function name. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type typescript -A 5 $'createConfirmedIndictment'Length of output: 88
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all references to the old function name have been updated. # Test: Search for the old function name. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type ts -A 5 $'createConfirmedIndictment'Length of output: 45
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/formatters/confirmedPdf.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Datadog ReportBranch report: ❌ 1 Failed (0 Known Flaky), 21173 Passed, 0 Skipped, 18m 37.1s Total Time ❌ Failed Tests (1)
🔻 Code Coverage Decreases vs Default Branch (1)
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #15921 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 36.86% 36.85% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 6715 6715
Lines 137631 137664 +33
Branches 39132 39134 +2
==========================================
+ Hits 50732 50737 +5
- Misses 86899 86927 +28
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/formatters/confirmedPdf.ts (1)
338-436: Approve implementation and suggest adding unit tests.The implementation of
createCourtRecordConfirmationis well-structured and follows the existing patterns for drawing visual elements on the PDF. Consider adding unit tests to cover different scenarios and ensure the function behaves as expected.Would you like me to help in drafting some unit tests for this functionality?
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/formatters/confirmedPdf.ts (6 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/formatters/confirmedPdf.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
Additional comments not posted (3)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/formatters/confirmedPdf.ts (3)
14-17: LGTM!The introduction of the
ConfirmableCaseFileCategoriestype improves type safety and clarity in the code by replacing the direct usage ofCaseFileCategoryenums in thecreateConfirmedPdffunction signature.
209-221: LGTM!The changes to the dimensions of the shadow and title elements in the
createRulingConfirmationfunction are approved.
441-459: LGTM!The changes to the
createConfirmedPdffunction are approved. The refactoring from a series ofifstatements to aswitchimproves readability and maintainability. The inclusion of a default case that throws an error for unsupportedfileTypeenhances error handling.
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/file/file.service.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/file/file.service.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…med-court-records
…land.is into j-s/confirmed-court-records
* Checkpoint * Cleanup * Rename * Refactor * Remove unused code * Fix lint * Create confirmed ruling * Create confirmed ruling * Make confirmation smaller * Make confirmation smaller * Use correct date * Merge * Refactor * Refactor * Cleanup * Create court record pdf confirmation * Cleanup * Fix typos * Merge * Fix typo * Fix shouldGetConfirmedDocument function --------- Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Confirmed court records
Asana
What
Create a confirmation stamp on court records in S-cases
Screenshots / Gifs
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements