Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move api version check to header #2037

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 28, 2015
Merged

Move api version check to header #2037

merged 2 commits into from
Dec 28, 2015

Conversation

rht
Copy link
Contributor

@rht rht commented Dec 4, 2015

#2003 but on master.

closes #1990, #2003

Addresses #2003 (comment) by checking if the repo is process-locked.

@jbenet jbenet added the status/in-progress In progress label Dec 4, 2015
}

return nil, cmds.ClientError(e)
return nil, nil
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • why is this no longer an error?
  • and why nil, instead of func () {} ? nevermind

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok sounds good

@whyrusleeping whyrusleeping added this to the IPFS 0.3.10 milestone Dec 6, 2015
@whyrusleeping
Copy link
Member

tenatively calling this one part of 0.3.10. @rht do you think we can get this in by thursday?

@jbenet
Copy link
Member

jbenet commented Dec 7, 2015

@whyrusleeping if 0.3.10 is very close, we can ship it and do a 0.3.11 for the rest of these things before 0.4.0

@whyrusleeping
Copy link
Member

right, very close is feeling like thursday to me, based on past experience.

@whyrusleeping
Copy link
Member

and i'm gonna nix any 0.3.11, 0.3.10, then 0.4.0. everything else can be rebased.

@rht
Copy link
Contributor Author

rht commented Dec 16, 2015

Sorry, @whyrusleeping just rebased.

@rht rht mentioned this pull request Dec 16, 2015
@ghost ghost added the topic/commands Topic commands label Dec 22, 2015
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: rht <rhtbot@gmail.com>
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: rht <rhtbot@gmail.com>
@whyrusleeping
Copy link
Member

alright, this has been around long enough. merging

whyrusleeping added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 28, 2015
Move api version check to header
@whyrusleeping whyrusleeping merged commit 2f9c894 into master Dec 28, 2015
@jbenet jbenet removed the status/in-progress In progress label Dec 28, 2015
@Kubuxu Kubuxu deleted the header-version-check branch May 13, 2016 22:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
topic/commands Topic commands
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

each CLI command makes two api requests
3 participants