Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rk cq guides #445

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

Rk cq guides #445

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

rkuchan
Copy link
Contributor

@rkuchan rkuchan commented May 14, 2016

@rkuchan rkuchan force-pushed the rk-cq-guides branch 9 times, most recently from 684dd11 to c532952 Compare May 17, 2016 00:45
@rkuchan rkuchan removed the WIP label May 17, 2016

<dt>
The replication factor (`REPLICATION 1`) does not serve a purpose for single
node instances. Please feel free to ignore that part of the syntax.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Probably reword to something like:

"The replication factor (REPLICATION 1) is a required parameter but must always be set to 1 for single node instances."

Users can't ignore the syntax, it's required. But we can just tell them it's always the same value, and then it's just boilerplate syntax.

@beckettsean
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM. Would love to break this out as we discussed. Good stuff!

@beckettsean
Copy link
Contributor

@rkuchan what's the status of this? Merging with 1.0?

@rkuchan
Copy link
Contributor Author

rkuchan commented Aug 29, 2016

No - I can close it. It has content that I haven't had time to look at lately. It'll come back soon.

@rkuchan rkuchan closed this Aug 29, 2016
@rkuchan rkuchan deleted the rk-cq-guides branch October 17, 2016 23:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Define retention policy document using CQs to substitute for nested functions or the HAVING clause
2 participants