-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 292
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rk cq guides #445
Rk cq guides #445
Conversation
rkuchan
commented
May 14, 2016
•
edited
Loading
edited
- Creates a new CQ use cases guide
- Adds Downsampling and Data Retention to that guide, and makes it a lot shorter, this fixes Define retention policy #447
- Adds a section about using CQs in places of HAVING or nested functions; this fixes document using CQs to substitute for nested functions or the HAVING clause #351
684dd11
to
c532952
Compare
|
||
<dt> | ||
The replication factor (`REPLICATION 1`) does not serve a purpose for single | ||
node instances. Please feel free to ignore that part of the syntax. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Probably reword to something like:
"The replication factor (REPLICATION 1
) is a required parameter but must always be set to 1 for single node instances."
Users can't ignore the syntax, it's required. But we can just tell them it's always the same value, and then it's just boilerplate syntax.
LGTM. Would love to break this out as we discussed. Good stuff! |
@rkuchan what's the status of this? Merging with 1.0? |
No - I can close it. It has content that I haven't had time to look at lately. It'll come back soon. |