Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

mysql_virtual_network_rule waitLRO #16043

Conversation

shu-ying789
Copy link
Contributor

linked to #15641

Comment on lines 98 to 99
log.Printf("[DEBUG] Waiting for %s to become ready", id)
stateConf := &pluginsdk.StateChangeConf{
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

have you confirmed this is no longer required?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ping @shu-ying789 - have you confirmed that this is no longer required? the LRO itself didn't correctly wait for the ProvisioningState at one point in time.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @tombuildsstuff , based on the tests, it seems that this is no longer required.

Copy link
Collaborator

@magodo magodo Apr 6, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMHO can we still keep the stateConf wait logic here, while only add up for the missing wait for future part in each of these PRs, to avoid any surprise?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense to me - when we replace the base layer both of these will be done automatically, but for now keeping both is fine 👍

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@tombuildsstuff stateConf I added it again, please check again, thanks!

@github-actions github-actions bot added size/XS and removed size/S labels Apr 6, 2022
Copy link
Collaborator

@katbyte katbyte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🚜

@katbyte katbyte merged commit e0c13c7 into hashicorp:main Apr 12, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v3.2.0 milestone Apr 12, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link

This functionality has been released in v3.2.0 of the Terraform Provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading.

For further feature requests or bug reports with this functionality, please create a new GitHub issue following the template. Thank you!

@github-actions
Copy link

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 15, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants