-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 74
Making naming of PubSub resources consistent and more readable #1207
Conversation
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: nachocano The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/assign @Harwayne |
/retest
…On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 7:22 PM Knative Prow Robot ***@***.***> wrote:
@nachocano <https://github.com/nachocano>: The following tests *failed*,
say /retest to rerun all failed tests:
Test name Commit Details Rerun command
pull-google-knative-gcp-wi-tests 2ca0af1
<2ca0af1>
link
<https://prow.knative.dev/view/gcs/knative-prow/pr-logs/pull/google_knative-gcp/1207/pull-google-knative-gcp-wi-tests/1268361477232791554> /test
pull-google-knative-gcp-wi-tests
pull-google-knative-gcp-integration-tests 2ca0af1
<2ca0af1>
link
<https://prow.knative.dev/view/gcs/knative-prow/pr-logs/pull/google_knative-gcp/1207/pull-google-knative-gcp-integration-tests/1268361477232791555> /test
pull-google-knative-gcp-integration-tests
Full PR test history
<https://gubernator.knative.dev/pr/google_knative-gcp/1207>. Your PR
dashboard <https://gubernator.knative.dev/pr/nachocano>.
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here
<https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md>. If
you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an
issue against the kubernetes/test-infra
<https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:>
repository. I understand the commands that are listed here
<https://go.k8s.io/bot-commands>.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1207 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABD65DHUX6TSQDK7WXEES7LRU4ANXANCNFSM4NSF5LTA>
.
|
/retest |
/retest |
@Harwayne this is ready for review... |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Make a P1 issue that blocks the 0.16 release to have the controllers clean up the old resources.
@@ -38,5 +39,6 @@ func GenerateTopicResourceName(s *v1alpha1.CloudAuditLogsSource) string { | |||
// GenerateSinkName generates a Stackdriver sink resource name for an | |||
// CloudAuditLogsSource. | |||
func GenerateSinkName(s *v1alpha1.CloudAuditLogsSource) string { | |||
return fmt.Sprintf("sink-%s", string(s.UID)) | |||
// This name should be different than the one provided by GenerateTopicName. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add to this comment saying why it has to be different.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I may have been wrong. The problem might have been just about the length. Let me try again with cre-src
... If it doesn't work, then I'll switch back to cre-cal
and add the comment
Created an issue to track the proper removal of resources... #1217 |
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
|
/test pull-google-knative-gcp-wi-tests |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
seeing
|
I was seeing the same thing in #1156. |
ok, yeah, might be something weird with PROW. Hope the retest will pass. |
another one
/retest |
Seems to be the OOM issue we had for build tests? We haven't seen integration test is taking so much memory for other repos so far, but I think making changes to the knative-gcp integration test Prow jobs (similar as done by knative/test-infra#2146) would fix this issue. |
@capri-xiyue I need to step out for a few hours. Can you help me out and increase those limits so that we can get this PR in? If you don't have cycles, no worries, I'll do once I'm back |
@nacho Submitted this PR knative/test-infra#2166 to increase the mem limit of prow e2e test jobs |
/retest |
/test pull-google-knative-gcp-integration-tests |
/test pull-google-knative-gcp-integration-tests |
/retest |
The following jobs failed:
Job pull-google-knative-gcp-integration-tests expended all 3 retries without success. |
/retest |
YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!! FINALLYYYY Thanks @capri-xiyue and @Harwayne |
Fixes #1155
Proposed Changes
cre-<owner_type>_<namespace>_<name>_<uid>
.Release Note