Allow code search by filename #32210
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
GiteaBot
added
the
lgtm/need 2
pull-request-size
bot
added
the
size/XL
bsofiato
force-pushed
the
feature/search_by_path
branch
6 times, most recently
from
9c77450
to
05a5090
Compare
delvh
reviewed
Oct 7, 2024
tests/gitea-repositories-meta/org42/search-by-path.git/description
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
bsofiato
force-pushed
the
feature/search_by_path
branch
2 times, most recently
from
89f67c6
to
12c542d
Compare
|
The year of copyright in new files should be 2024. |
bsofiato
force-pushed
the
feature/search_by_path
branch
from
12c542d
to
19b08c0
Compare
Done |
bsofiato
force-pushed
the
feature/search_by_path
branch
from
19b08c0
to
0de61a1
Compare
Signed-off-by: Bruno Sofiato <bruno.sofiato@gmail.com>
|
Please do not force push, it's hard to follow changes this way |
Sure. My bad 😔 |
lunny
reviewed
Oct 10, 2024
delvh
approved these changes
Oct 11, 2024
GiteaBot
added
lgtm/need 1
Ah, right - for this to happen, we need to increase |
|
Can you add a search test with filename as keyword? |
I have included some., I'll provide some comments on the test cases to better describe their underlying scenarios. What do you think ? |
Hey @lunny, I've added some comments to the test cases to better describe their scenarios :) |
lunny
approved these changes
Oct 11, 2024
GiteaBot
added
lgtm/done
lunny
added
the
reviewed/wait-merge
GiteaBot
removed
the
reviewed/wait-merge
matera-bs
pushed a commit
to matera-ar/gitea
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 15, 2024
go-gitea#32210) This is a large and complex PR, so let me explain in detail its changes. First, I had to create new index mappings for Bleve and ElasticSerach as the current ones do not support search by filename. This requires Gitea to recreate the code search indexes (I do not know if this is a breaking change, but I feel it deserves a heads-up). I've used [this approach](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/7.17/analysis-pathhierarchy-tokenizer.html) to model the filename index. It allows us to efficiently search for both the full path and the name of a file. Bleve, however, does not support this out-of-box, so I had to code a brand new [token filter](https://blevesearch.com/docs/Token-Filters/) to generate the search terms. I also did an overhaul in the `indexer_test.go` file. It now asserts the order of the expected results (this is important since matches based on the name of a file are more relevant than those based on its content). I've added new test scenarios that deal with searching by filename. They use a new repo included in the Gitea fixture. The screenshot below depicts how Gitea shows the search results. It shows results based on content in the same way as the current version does. In matches based on the filename, the first seven lines of the file contents are shown (BTW, this is how GitHub does it).  Resolves go-gitea#32096 --------- Signed-off-by: Bruno Sofiato <bruno.sofiato@gmail.com>
matera-bs
pushed a commit
to matera-ar/gitea
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 15, 2024
go-gitea#32210) This is a large and complex PR, so let me explain in detail its changes. First, I had to create new index mappings for Bleve and ElasticSerach as the current ones do not support search by filename. This requires Gitea to recreate the code search indexes (I do not know if this is a breaking change, but I feel it deserves a heads-up). I've used [this approach](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/7.17/analysis-pathhierarchy-tokenizer.html) to model the filename index. It allows us to efficiently search for both the full path and the name of a file. Bleve, however, does not support this out-of-box, so I had to code a brand new [token filter](https://blevesearch.com/docs/Token-Filters/) to generate the search terms. I also did an overhaul in the `indexer_test.go` file. It now asserts the order of the expected results (this is important since matches based on the name of a file are more relevant than those based on its content). I've added new test scenarios that deal with searching by filename. They use a new repo included in the Gitea fixture. The screenshot below depicts how Gitea shows the search results. It shows results based on content in the same way as the current version does. In matches based on the filename, the first seven lines of the file contents are shown (BTW, this is how GitHub does it).  Resolves go-gitea#32096 --------- Signed-off-by: Bruno Sofiato <bruno.sofiato@gmail.com>
zjjhot
added a commit
to zjjhot/gitea
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 16, 2024
* giteaofficial/main: Make `owner/repo/pulls` handlers use "PR reader" permission (go-gitea#32254) make `show stats` work when only one file changed (go-gitea#32244) Update scheduled tasks even if changes are pushed by "ActionsUser" (go-gitea#32246) Support migrating GitHub/GitLab PR draft status (go-gitea#32242) Only rename a user when they should receive a different name (go-gitea#32247) Fix dropdown content overflow (go-gitea#31610) Make git push options accept short name (go-gitea#32245) Allow code search by filename (go-gitea#32210) Allow maintainers to view and edit files of private repos when "Allow maintainers to edit" is enabled (go-gitea#32215) Use per package global lock for container uploads instead of memory lock (go-gitea#31860)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a large and complex PR, so let me explain in detail its changes.
First, I had to create new index mappings for Bleve and ElasticSerach as the current ones do not support search by filename. This requires Gitea to recreate the code search indexes (I do not know if this is a breaking change, but I feel it deserves a heads-up).
I've used this approach to model the filename index. It allows us to efficiently search for both the full path and the name of a file. Bleve, however, does not support this out-of-box, so I had to code a brand new token filter to generate the search terms.
I also did an overhaul in the
indexer_test.gofile. It now asserts the order of the expected results (this is important since matches based on the name of a file are more relevant than those based on its content).I've added new test scenarios that deal with searching by filename. They use a new repo included in the Gitea fixture.
The screenshot below depicts how Gitea shows the search results. It shows results based on content in the same way as the current version does. In matches based on the filename, the first seven lines of the file contents are shown (BTW, this is how GitHub does it).
Resolves #32096