Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Accommodate correctly pluralized ViewStrings in GAP #102

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 26, 2020
Merged

Accommodate correctly pluralized ViewStrings in GAP #102

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 26, 2020

Conversation

wilfwilson
Copy link
Member

(Note: this is very similar to the PR I made for the package XModAlg.)

In a future version of GAP, some nouns will be correctly pluralised to match their number. For example, the ViewString in GAP for CyclicGroup(3); is currently <pc group of size 3 with 1 generators>, whereas it will soon correctly show <pc group of size 3 with 1 generator>.

The changes in this PR maintain the backwards compatibility of this package with GAP, and it ensures that the upcoming changes to GAP on this topic do not affect the package either.

See gap-system/gap#3992 and gap-system/gap#4050 for more context.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 26, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #102 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #102   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   78.62%   78.62%           
=======================================
  Files          39       39           
  Lines       13851    13851           
=======================================
  Hits        10890    10890           
  Misses       2961     2961           

@cdwensley cdwensley merged commit 92da924 into gap-packages:master Jul 26, 2020
@wilfwilson wilfwilson deleted the pluralize branch July 26, 2020 17:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants