-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
package standardization updates + postgres compat #38
package standardization updates + postgres compat #38
Conversation
…/dbt_shopify_source into feature/package_updates
Co-authored-by: Joe Markiewicz <74217849+fivetran-joemarkiewicz@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Joe Markiewicz <74217849+fivetran-joemarkiewicz@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Joe Markiewicz <74217849+fivetran-joemarkiewicz@users.noreply.github.com>
Feature/package updates
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ | |||
{{ | |||
fivetran_utils.union_data( | |||
table_identifier='order', | |||
table_identifier='order', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@fivetran-reneeli actually does this need to be shopify_order_identifier
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh I think you're right. I'll make the changes to my stripe package too now. Thanks for noticing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sweet will also update
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
wait wait i'm wrong!!!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it should be the name of the source table node (which we ourselves have defined), not the source table node's identifier
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good! Nice job catching the table_identifier
naming
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ | |||
{{ | |||
fivetran_utils.union_data( | |||
table_identifier='order', | |||
table_identifier='order', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh I think you're right. I'll make the changes to my stripe package too now. Thanks for noticing
Are you a current Fivetran customer?
fivetran made PR
What change(s) does this PR introduce?
Did you update the CHANGELOG?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Did you update the dbt_project.yml files with the version upgrade (please leverage standard semantic versioning)? (In both your main project and integration_tests)
Is this PR in response to a previously created Bug or Feature Request
How did you test the PR changes?
Select which warehouse(s) were used to test the PR
Provide an emoji that best describes your current mood
💃
Feedback
We are so excited you decided to contribute to the Fivetran community dbt package! We continue to work to improve the packages and would greatly appreciate your feedback on our existing dbt packages or what you'd like to see next.