Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

package standardization updates + postgres compat #38

Merged

Conversation

fivetran-jamie
Copy link
Contributor

@fivetran-jamie fivetran-jamie commented Dec 1, 2022

Are you a current Fivetran customer?

fivetran made PR

What change(s) does this PR introduce?

Did you update the CHANGELOG?

  • Yes

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes (please provide breaking change details below.)
  • No (please provide an explanation as to how the change is non-breaking below.)

Did you update the dbt_project.yml files with the version upgrade (please leverage standard semantic versioning)? (In both your main project and integration_tests)

  • Yes

Is this PR in response to a previously created Bug or Feature Request

  • Yes, Issue/Feature [link bug/feature number here]
  • No

How did you test the PR changes?

  • CircleCi
  • Local (please provide additional testing details below)

Select which warehouse(s) were used to test the PR

  • BigQuery
  • Redshift
  • Snowflake
  • Postgres
  • Databricks
  • Other (provide details below)

Provide an emoji that best describes your current mood

💃

Feedback

We are so excited you decided to contribute to the Fivetran community dbt package! We continue to work to improve the packages and would greatly appreciate your feedback on our existing dbt packages or what you'd like to see next.

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
{{
fivetran_utils.union_data(
table_identifier='order',
table_identifier='order',
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@fivetran-reneeli actually does this need to be shopify_order_identifier ?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh I think you're right. I'll make the changes to my stripe package too now. Thanks for noticing

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sweet will also update

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

wait wait i'm wrong!!!

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it should be the name of the source table node (which we ourselves have defined), not the source table node's identifier

Copy link
Contributor

@fivetran-reneeli fivetran-reneeli left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good! Nice job catching the table_identifier naming

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
{{
fivetran_utils.union_data(
table_identifier='order',
table_identifier='order',
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh I think you're right. I'll make the changes to my stripe package too now. Thanks for noticing

@fivetran-jamie fivetran-jamie merged commit 74ed078 into feature/package-revamp Dec 13, 2022
@fivetran-jamie fivetran-jamie mentioned this pull request Jan 31, 2023
14 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants