Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Fix] Increase @Timeout duration to 5 minutes for extended task execution #8639

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 28, 2024

Conversation

rahul-rocket
Copy link
Collaborator

@rahul-rocket rahul-rocket commented Dec 28, 2024

PR

Please note: we will close your PR without comment if you do not check the boxes above and provide ALL requested information.


Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced startup timing measurements for the API.
    • Improved logging and error handling in server tasks.
  • Documentation

    • Added more detailed comments and logging messages across various components.
  • Chores

    • Reorganized configuration files.
    • Updated environment variable loading process.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling in server and API startup processes.
    • Clarified error logging for missing configuration properties in analytics services.

Copy link

gitguardian bot commented Dec 28, 2024

⚠️ GitGuardian has uncovered 1 secret following the scan of your pull request.

Please consider investigating the findings and remediating the incidents. Failure to do so may lead to compromising the associated services or software components.

🔎 Detected hardcoded secret in your pull request
GitGuardian id GitGuardian status Secret Commit Filename
11719210 Triggered Nx Cloud Token 477fe0d nx.json View secret
🛠 Guidelines to remediate hardcoded secrets
  1. Understand the implications of revoking this secret by investigating where it is used in your code.
  2. Replace and store your secret safely. Learn here the best practices.
  3. Revoke and rotate this secret.
  4. If possible, rewrite git history. Rewriting git history is not a trivial act. You might completely break other contributing developers' workflow and you risk accidentally deleting legitimate data.

To avoid such incidents in the future consider


🦉 GitGuardian detects secrets in your source code to help developers and security teams secure the modern development process. You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized GitGuardian to scan your pull request.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 28, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request enhances the API startup process by introducing detailed logging and timing measurements across various files. It includes new timing logs for the overall API startup, environment variable loading, and bootstrap processes. Additionally, modifications to log messages improve clarity and consistency. The changes aim to provide comprehensive visibility into the startup sequence, ensuring that each significant step is tracked and logged effectively.

Changes

File Change Summary
apps/api/src/main.ts Added timing measurements for API startup process and modified log messages.
nx.json Reorganized configuration file without functional changes.
packages/core/src/lib/bootstrap/index.ts Updated console timing messages and startup logging.
packages/core/src/lib/main.ts Added dotenv import and comprehensive timing logs for startup stages.
packages/desktop-lib/src/lib/server/service/api-service.ts Refactored error handling and added runWithApiConfig method.
packages/desktop-lib/src/lib/server/service/server-task.ts Enhanced error handling, logging, and added new methods for stdout/stderr management.
packages/plugins/jitsu-analytics/src/lib/jitsu-analytics.service.ts Improved logging for initialization errors.
packages/plugins/jitsu-analytics/src/lib/jitsu-events.subscriber.ts Enhanced error logging during initialization.
packages/plugins/jitsu-analytics/src/lib/jitsu-helper.ts Removed error logging for missing configuration properties.

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 Startup Rhythms, Ticking Time
Logs dancing, metrics so fine,
Milliseconds leap, configurations shine,
A rabbit's watch, precise and keen,
Tracking each moment of the startup scene!
✨🕰️ Hop, hop, hurray! 🚀

Tip

CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command @coderabbitai generate docstrings to have CodeRabbit automatically generate docstrings for your pull request. We would love to hear your feedback on Discord.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
nx.json (1)

89-170: Consider enabling cache for better build performance

Most of your build targets have "cache": false, which could significantly impact build times. Consider enabling caching for targets that produce deterministic outputs.

Example targets that typically benefit from caching:

  • build
  • test
  • lint
  • @nx/jest:jest
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 130dd09 and 477fe0d.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • apps/api/src/main.ts (1 hunks)
  • nx.json (1 hunks)
  • packages/core/src/lib/bootstrap/index.ts (2 hunks)
  • packages/core/src/lib/main.ts (2 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-lib/src/lib/server/service/api-service.ts (2 hunks)
  • packages/desktop-lib/src/lib/server/service/server-task.ts (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
packages/desktop-lib/src/lib/server/service/server-task.ts

[error] 108-108: Don't use 'Function' as a type.

Prefer explicitly define the function shape. This type accepts any function-like value, which can be a common source of bugs.

(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)


[error] 108-108: Don't use 'Function' as a type.

Prefer explicitly define the function shape. This type accepts any function-like value, which can be a common source of bugs.

(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)

🪛 Gitleaks (8.21.2)
nx.json

87-87: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)

🔇 Additional comments (19)
packages/desktop-lib/src/lib/server/service/server-task.ts (11)

62-71: Doc comments appear clear and well-structured.


72-72: Increased Timeout from 2 minutes to 5 minutes.
This aligns with the PR objective to accommodate longer task execution. However, please ensure that prolonged tasks won't monopolize system resources.


74-74: Console logs for debugging.
The added console logs and comments provide good insight into the process creation flow. Consider logging at different levels (debug/info) if verbosity becomes excessive.

Also applies to: 78-79, 82-83, 84-85, 87-88, 90-90


100-107: Method documentation is thorough.
No issues identified; the JSDoc clarifies parameters and return values nicely.


109-123: Stdout handling logic looks solid.
This effectively checks for success or critical errors. Be mindful of partial or multi-chunk logs, but this approach is acceptable for most scenarios.


131-135: Stderr capturing is straightforward.
It’s good to log errors separately for troubleshooting. No changes needed.


137-173: Key logic for stopping the process.
Properly handles missing process IDs and logs the outcome. This is well-structured for error handling.


178-186: Getter for running state.
Logic is accurate for checking both flags and config. No issues noted.


191-219: Restart method with proper stop-then-start flow.
Contains robust error handling. Looks good overall.


225-227: Stop method delegates to kill.
Documentation is clear. No issues found.


260-271: Error handling ensures process termination if requested.
Implementation is consistent with the rest of the class’s design. Looks good.

apps/api/src/main.ts (1)

3-28: Startup timing logs are well-organized.
Measuring total API startup time, bootstrap time, and plugin config time helps diagnose performance bottlenecks. The usage of chalk for coloring is a neat touch.

packages/core/src/lib/main.ts (1)

Line range hint 3-59: Environment variable loading and timing logs.
Using dotenv with separate .env/.env.local files is a good approach. The additional console.time entries improve visibility into the startup process.

packages/desktop-lib/src/lib/server/service/api-service.ts (4)

21-26: Refined API server start method.
Delegating logic to runWithApiConfig is a clean separation of concerns.


32-38: Restart method with runWithApiConfig.
Keeps error handling consistent, reducing duplicate code. Nicely done.


40-51: New runWithApiConfig method.
Centralizes config application and operation execution. Straightforward and clean approach.


63-70: setApiConfig method updates arguments with environment data.
Logs the updated configuration for clarity. Implementation is good.

packages/core/src/lib/bootstrap/index.ts (2)

64-64: Added console.time for application startup.
Provides better insight into bootstrap duration.


286-286: Refined startup log message.
Indicates the app is running and prints the correct URL. Clear for end-users and testers.

packages/desktop-lib/src/lib/server/service/server-task.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
nx.json Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

nx-cloud bot commented Dec 28, 2024

View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit 9684b7e.

Command Status Duration Result
nx build desktop --base-href ./ ✅ Succeeded 1m 58s View ↗
nx build desktop-api --output-path=dist/apps/de... ✅ Succeeded 31s View ↗
nx run api:desktop-api ✅ Succeeded 1m 21s View ↗
nx run gauzy:desktop-ui --base-href ./ ✅ Succeeded 4m 34s View ↗
nx build desktop-ui-lib --configuration=production ✅ Succeeded 31s View ↗
nx build plugin-integration-wakatime ✅ Succeeded <1s View ↗
nx build desktop-lib ✅ Succeeded <1s View ↗
nx build desktop-window ✅ Succeeded <1s View ↗
Additional runs (51) ✅ Succeeded ... View ↗

☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at 2024-12-28 12:15:43 UTC

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
packages/desktop-lib/src/lib/server/service/server-task.ts (1)

108-127: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Avoid using 'Function' type for better type safety.

The implementation looks good, but we should use explicit function types instead of the generic 'Function' type.

 private handleStdout(
   data: Buffer,
-  resolve: Function,
-  reject: Function
+  resolve: (value?: unknown) => void,
+  reject: (reason?: unknown) => void
 ): void {
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
packages/desktop-lib/src/lib/server/service/server-task.ts (2)

135-139: Consider categorizing stderr messages for better error tracking.

While the implementation is correct, consider categorizing error messages to help with monitoring and debugging.

 private handleStderr(data: Buffer): void {
   const errorMsg = data.toString();
+  const errorCategory = this.categorizeError(errorMsg);
   console.error('stderr:', errorMsg);
-  this.loggerObserver.notify(errorMsg);
+  this.loggerObserver.notify(`[${errorCategory}] ${errorMsg}`);
 }

+private categorizeError(msg: string): string {
+  if (msg.includes('ECONNREFUSED')) return 'CONNECTION';
+  if (msg.includes('EADDRINUSE')) return 'PORT';
+  return 'GENERAL';
+}

255-275: LGTM! Consider adding error categorization here as well.

The error handling implementation is solid with good prevention of recursive kills. Consider categorizing errors here as well to maintain consistency with the earlier suggestion.

 protected handleError(error: any, attemptKill: boolean = true): void {
   if (attemptKill) {
     this.kill(false);
   }

   this.stateObserver.notify(false);
-  const errorMessage = `ERROR: ${this.errorMessage} ${error}`;
+  const errorCategory = this.categorizeError(error.toString());
+  const errorMessage = `[${errorCategory}] ERROR: ${this.errorMessage} ${error}`;

   console.error(this.errorMessage, error);
   this.loggerObserver.notify(errorMessage);
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 477fe0d and a8aa2d7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/desktop-lib/src/lib/server/service/server-task.ts (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
packages/desktop-lib/src/lib/server/service/server-task.ts (4)

153-179: LGTM! Robust error handling improvements.

The enhanced error handling with proper process validation and clear error messages makes the kill operation more reliable.


182-190: LGTM! Clear documentation improvement.

The added documentation clearly explains the conditions that determine if a process is running.


195-223: LGTM! Well-structured restart implementation.

The enhanced logging and error handling with prevention of recursive kills makes the restart operation more reliable.


Line range hint 62-97: LGTM! Timeout increase and documentation improvements look good.

The increased timeout duration of 5 minutes and comprehensive documentation improvements enhance the method's clarity and reliability. The additional logging will help with debugging.

Let's verify if 5 minutes is sufficient for typical task execution:

✅ Verification successful

Let me analyze the search results and generate additional verification scripts to better understand the timeout usage in the codebase.


Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response regarding the timeout verification:

5-minute timeout is appropriate for server task initialization

The 5-minute timeout for the runTask method is appropriate because:

  1. It's used by both API and UI server tasks (as seen in ApiService and UiService classes that extend ServerTask)
  2. The timeout is specifically for the initialization/startup phase of these services
  3. The value aligns with common server startup timeouts, especially considering:
    • Database connection establishment
    • Server initialization and port binding
    • Initial resource loading
    • Development environment bootstrapping

The codebase search shows no timeout-related issues or bugs reported with the current server tasks, and the timeout is only applied to the initialization phase, not the running server processes.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any timeout-related issues or long-running tasks in the codebase
rg -i "timeout|timed out" --type ts

Length of output: 43676


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for server task related files and their timeout implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ extends ServerTask {
  $$$
}'

# Also search for any other timeout decorators usage
ast-grep --pattern '@Timeout($$$)'

Length of output: 12282

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/plugins/jitsu-analytics/src/lib/jitsu-events.subscriber.ts (1)

29-29: Prefer using NestJS Logger over console.error.

Currently, you're mixing console.error with the NestJS Logger, which can lead to inconsistent log formatting and potential confusion. Switching to this.logger.error(...) would keep logging consistent with the rest of the NestJS application.

- console.error(chalk.yellow('Jitsu Analytics initialization failed at JitsuEventsSubscriber: Missing host or writeKey.'));
+ this.logger.error('Jitsu Analytics initialization failed at JitsuEventsSubscriber: Missing host or writeKey.');
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a8aa2d7 and 9684b7e.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • packages/plugins/jitsu-analytics/src/lib/jitsu-analytics.service.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/plugins/jitsu-analytics/src/lib/jitsu-events.subscriber.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/plugins/jitsu-analytics/src/lib/jitsu-helper.ts (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • packages/plugins/jitsu-analytics/src/lib/jitsu-helper.ts
🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/plugins/jitsu-analytics/src/lib/jitsu-analytics.service.ts (1)

21-21: Consider verifying external references and usage.

You introduced the class name in the warning message at line 21. This is helpful for more precise error tracking, but ensure all references to this initialization process in dependent modules or services are consistently updated or verified so that logging remains accurate and not duplicated elsewhere.

@evereq evereq merged commit 602479e into develop Dec 28, 2024
15 of 17 checks passed
@evereq evereq deleted the fix/server-api-running-timeout branch December 28, 2024 14:39
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jan 8, 2025
2 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants