[Feat] Add @gauzy/plugin-integration-upwork-ui Package #8432
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a new project configuration for the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
New and removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎
🚮 Removed packages: npm/jasmine-spec-reporter@6.0.0, npm/karma-cli@2.0.0 |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 10
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (13)
packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/tsconfig.spec.json (2)
3-8: LGTM: Appropriate compiler options for testing environment.The compiler options are well-configured for a testing environment:
- Output directory is correctly set.
- CommonJS module system is suitable for Node.js where tests typically run.
- ES2016 target is appropriate for modern Node.js versions.
- Types for Jest and Node are correctly included.
Consider adding
"strict": trueto the compiler options to enable all strict type checking options, which can help catch more errors during development.
9-10: LGTM: Comprehensive inclusion of test files.The file inclusion configuration is well-structured:
- Explicit inclusion of "src/test-setup.ts" is good for global test setup.
- Patterns for including test files are comprehensive.
- Including "jest.config.ts" is necessary for TypeScript-based Jest configuration.
Consider separating the
filesandincludearrays for better readability:"files": ["src/test-setup.ts"], "include": [ "jest.config.ts", "src/**/*.test.ts", "src/**/*.spec.ts", "src/**/*.d.ts" ]This separation makes it clearer which files are explicitly included versus which patterns are used for inclusion.
packages/plugins/integration-hubstaff-ui/src/lib/integration-hubstaff.routes.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-31: Consider refactoring to follow Angular best practices for route configurationThe current file structure uses the
@NgModuledecorator, which is typically used for modules, not for simple route configurations. This approach, while functional, doesn't align with common Angular practices for organizing routes.Consider refactoring this file to use a more idiomatic approach:
- Define routes as a constant:
import { Routes } from '@angular/router'; import { HubstaffAuthorizeComponent } from './components/hubstaff-authorize/hubstaff-authorize.component'; import { HubstaffComponent } from './components/hubstaff/hubstaff.component'; export const INTEGRATION_HUBSTAFF_ROUTES: Routes = [ { path: '', component: HubstaffAuthorizeComponent, data: { state: true } }, { path: 'regenerate', component: HubstaffAuthorizeComponent, data: { state: false } }, { path: ':id', component: HubstaffComponent } ];
- Import this constant in your feature module and use it in
RouterModule.forChild().This approach separates route configuration from the module definition, making it easier to maintain and test. It also aligns better with Angular's style guide and common practices.
Would you like assistance in implementing this refactoring?
packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/.eslintrc.json (1)
27-31: HTML rules configuration is acceptable, but consider enhancements.The configuration for HTML files extends from the NX Angular template plugin, which provides a good set of default rules. However, no specific rules are defined.
Consider adding template-specific rules if there are any project-specific conventions or best practices you want to enforce in your HTML templates. For example, you might want to add rules for accessibility, template syntax preferences, or custom Angular practices.
packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/src/lib/components/reports/reports.component.html (1)
21-21: LGTM: Improved nb-rangepicker tag syntaxThe change from a separate closing tag to a self-closing tag for the nb-rangepicker is a good practice when no content is present between the tags. This improves code conciseness without affecting functionality.
For consistency, consider applying the same self-closing tag syntax to other similar elements in the template, such as the
<input>element on line 11-15. This would further enhance the overall code style consistency.packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/project.json (3)
9-24: LGTM: Build configuration is well-structured.The build target is correctly configured for an Angular library, with separate TypeScript configurations for production and development environments. This is a good practice for optimizing builds.
Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of the different TypeScript configurations, especially if there are significant differences between
tsconfig.lib.prod.jsonandtsconfig.lib.json.
25-38: LGTM: Test configuration is properly set up.The test target is well-configured, using Jest and including a CI-specific configuration with code coverage enabled.
Consider enabling code coverage for all test runs, not just in CI environments. This can be achieved by moving the
codeCoverageoption to the mainoptionsobject:"test": { "executor": "@nrwl/jest:jest", "outputs": ["{workspaceRoot}/coverage/{projectRoot}"], "options": { "jestConfig": "packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/jest.config.ts", - "passWithNoTests": true + "passWithNoTests": true, + "codeCoverage": true }, "configurations": { "ci": { - "ci": true, - "codeCoverage": true + "ci": true } } },This change would ensure that code coverage is generated for all test runs, providing more consistent feedback during development.
39-48: LGTM: Lint configuration is appropriately set up.The lint target is correctly configured to use ESLint for both TypeScript and HTML files, which is suitable for an Angular project.
Consider the following enhancements to improve the linting process:
- Add a specific ESLint configuration file for this project, if not already present:
"lint": { "executor": "@nrwl/linter:eslint", "outputs": ["{options.outputFile}"], "options": { + "eslintConfig": "packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/.eslintrc.json", "lintFilePatterns": [ "packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/**/*.ts", "packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/**/*.html" ] } }
- Include linting for any potential test files:
"lintFilePatterns": [ "packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/**/*.ts", - "packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/**/*.html" + "packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/**/*.html", + "packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/**/*.spec.ts" ]These changes would provide more granular control over linting rules and ensure that test files are also linted.
packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/src/lib/integration-upwork.routes.ts (1)
9-57: Well-structured routing configuration with room for enhancement.The routing module is well-organized and follows Angular best practices. The use of
RouterModule.forChild()for lazy loading is appropriate. The structure allows for flexible routing with dynamic:idparameters and child routes for different Upwork functionalities.Consider enhancing security and user experience by adding route guards. For example:
- Implement an
AuthGuardto protect routes that require authentication.- Add a
CanDeactivateguard for forms to prevent accidental navigation away from unsaved changes.Example implementation:
import { AuthGuard } from './auth.guard'; import { UnsavedChangesGuard } from './unsaved-changes.guard'; // In the route configuration { path: ':id', component: UpworkComponent, canActivate: [AuthGuard], children: [ // ... { path: 'contracts', component: ContractsComponent, canDeactivate: [UnsavedChangesGuard] } // ... ] }This would improve the security and user experience of your application.
packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/package.json (2)
1-29: LGTM! Package metadata is well-defined.The package metadata is comprehensive and follows best practices. The name, version, description, author information, license, and URLs are all properly specified. The keywords are relevant and will aid in package discoverability.
Consider adding a brief mention of the technologies used (e.g., Angular) in the description to provide more context:
- "description": "A UI plugin for integrating Upwork with the Gauzy platform, providing seamless management of freelance projects and payments.", + "description": "An Angular-based UI plugin for integrating Upwork with the Gauzy platform, providing seamless management of freelance projects and payments.",
40-51: Dependencies are well-defined, but some adjustments could be beneficial.The dependencies list includes appropriate packages for an Angular-based Upwork integration plugin. However, consider the following suggestions:
- Move
@angular/formsand@angular/routerto peerDependencies, as they are typically provided by the main application.- Consider moving
@ngx-translate/coreandngx-permissionsto peerDependencies if they are expected to be provided by the main application.- Evaluate if
angular2-smart-tablecould be a devDependency if it's only used for development or testing purposes.Here's a suggested refactor for the dependencies section:
"peerDependencies": { "@angular/common": "^16.2.12", - "@angular/core": "^16.2.12" + "@angular/core": "^16.2.12", + "@angular/forms": "^16.2.12", + "@angular/router": "^16.2.12", + "@ngx-translate/core": "^15.0.0", + "ngx-permissions": "^13.0.1" }, "dependencies": { - "@angular/forms": "^16.2.12", - "@angular/router": "^16.2.12", "@gauzy/contracts": "^0.1.0", "@nebular/theme": "^12.0.0", "@ngneat/until-destroy": "^9.2.0", - "@ngx-translate/core": "^15.0.0", - "angular2-smart-table": "^3.2.0", - "ngx-permissions": "^13.0.1", "rxjs": "^7.4.0", "tslib": "^2.6.2" }, "devDependencies": { "@types/jest": "^29.4.4", "@types/node": "^20.14.9", - "jest-preset-angular": "^13.1.4" + "jest-preset-angular": "^13.1.4", + "angular2-smart-table": "^3.2.0" },These changes will help ensure that the plugin integrates more smoothly with the main application and clarifies which dependencies are essential for runtime vs. development.
package.json (1)
166-167: LGTM! Consider adding these scripts to the build:package:plugins:pre scripts.The new scripts for building the "integration-upwork-ui" plugin look good and follow the established pattern for other plugin build scripts in this project. They correctly use cross-env for setting environment variables and increase the Node.js memory limit, which is consistent with other build scripts.
To ensure these new scripts are included in the overall build process, consider adding them to the
build:package:plugins:preandbuild:package:plugins:pre:prodscripts. This would involve updating those scripts as follows:"build:package:plugins:pre": "yarn run build:package:ui-config && yarn run build:package:ui-core && yarn run build:package:ui-auth && yarn run build:package:plugin:onboarding-ui && yarn run build:package:plugin:legal-ui && yarn run build:package:plugin:job-search-ui && yarn run build:package:plugin:job-matching-ui && yarn run build:package:plugin:job-employee-ui && yarn run build:package:plugin:job-proposal-ui && yarn run build:package:plugin:public-layout-ui && yarn run build:package:plugin:maintenance-ui && yarn run build:package:plugin:integration-ai-ui && yarn run build:package:plugin:integration-hubstaff-ui + && yarn run build:package:plugin:integration-upwork-ui", "build:package:plugins:pre:prod": "yarn run build:package:ui-config:prod && yarn run build:package:ui-core:prod && yarn run build:package:ui-auth && yarn run build:package:plugin:onboarding-ui:prod && yarn run build:package:plugin:legal-ui:prod && yarn run build:package:plugin:job-search-ui:prod && yarn run build:package:plugin:job-matching-ui:prod && yarn run build:package:plugin:job-employee-ui:prod && yarn run build:package:plugin:job-proposal-ui:prod && yarn run build:package:plugin:public-layout-ui:prod && yarn run build:package:plugin:maintenance-ui:prod && yarn run build:package:plugin:integration-ai-ui:prod && yarn run build:package:plugin:integration-hubstaff-ui:prod + && yarn run build:package:plugin:integration-upwork-ui:prod",This ensures that the new Upwork integration UI plugin is built along with other plugins during the pre-build phase.
angular.json (1)
Line range hint
1-1180: Consider refactoring angular.json for improved maintainability.While the new configuration is correct and consistent, the
angular.jsonfile has become quite large and contains many repeated configurations across different projects. To improve maintainability and reduce duplication, consider the following suggestions:
- Extract common configurations into shared configuration files or use Angular workspace libraries for shared settings.
- Utilize inheritance or composition patterns to reuse common configuration blocks.
- Consider splitting the configuration into smaller, more manageable files for each project or group of related projects.
- Use environment-specific configuration files to manage different settings for development, production, and other environments.
These changes could significantly reduce the file size, improve readability, and make it easier to maintain and update configurations across multiple projects.
Would you like assistance in creating a plan to refactor the
angular.jsonfile?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (27)
- angular.json (1 hunks)
- apps/gauzy/src/app/pages/integrations/integrations.module.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/gauzy/src/app/pages/upwork/upwork-routing.module.ts (0 hunks)
- package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/plugins/integration-hubstaff-ui/src/lib/integration-hubstaff-ui.module.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/plugins/integration-hubstaff-ui/src/lib/integration-hubstaff.routes.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/.dockerignore (1 hunks)
- packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/.eslintrc.json (1 hunks)
- packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/.gitignore (1 hunks)
- packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/.npmignore (1 hunks)
- packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/README.md (1 hunks)
- packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/jest.config.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/ng-package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/project.json (1 hunks)
- packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/src/lib/components/contracts/contracts.component.ts (3 hunks)
- packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/src/lib/components/reports/reports.component.html (2 hunks)
- packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/src/lib/components/reports/reports.component.ts (7 hunks)
- packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/src/lib/integration-upwork-ui.module.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/src/lib/integration-upwork.routes.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/src/test-setup.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
- packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/tsconfig.lib.json (1 hunks)
- packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/tsconfig.lib.prod.json (1 hunks)
- packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/tsconfig.spec.json (1 hunks)
- tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- apps/gauzy/src/app/pages/upwork/upwork-routing.module.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (8)
- packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/.dockerignore
- packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/.gitignore
- packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/.npmignore
- packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/README.md
- packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/ng-package.json
- packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/src/test-setup.ts
- packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/tsconfig.json
- packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/tsconfig.lib.prod.json
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (44)
packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/tsconfig.spec.json (2)
1-2: LGTM: Proper extension of base configuration.Extending the base
tsconfig.jsonis a good practice for maintaining consistency across different build configurations while allowing for specific overrides for testing purposes.
1-11: Overall, the tsconfig.spec.json is well-configured for testing purposes.The configuration extends the base tsconfig.json, sets appropriate compiler options for a testing environment, and includes necessary files and patterns for tests. The suggestions provided are minor improvements that can enhance the configuration's robustness and readability.
packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/tsconfig.lib.json (5)
2-2: LGTM: Proper extension of base configuration.Extending the base
tsconfig.jsonis a good practice for maintaining consistency across related configurations.
10-10: LGTM: Appropriate exclusion of test-related files.The
excludearray properly omits test files and configurations from the library build, which is a standard practice.
11-11: LGTM: Correct inclusion of source files.The
includearray properly specifies all TypeScript files within thesrcdirectory for compilation, which is appropriate for a library project.
1-12: Overall, the tsconfig.lib.json is well-configured for a library project.The configuration extends a base tsconfig, sets appropriate compiler options for a library, and correctly specifies files to include and exclude. This setup should work well within a monorepo structure.
Just ensure that the
outDirpath is consistent with other packages in the project.
3-9: LGTM: Compiler options are well-configured for a library project.The compiler options are appropriately set for a library:
- Declarations and source maps are enabled, which is crucial for consumers of the library.
- Inline sources are enabled, aiding in debugging.
However, please verify that the
outDirpath "../../../dist/out-tsc" is correct and consistent with the project structure.To ensure the
outDirpath is consistent with other packages, run:✅ Verification successful
Verified:
outDirpath is consistent across packages.The
outDirpath "../../../dist/out-tsc" aligns with other packages, ensuring consistency in the project structure.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if other packages use the same outDir path # Test: Search for outDir in other tsconfig files rg --type json '"outDir":' packages/ | grep -v 'integration-upwork-ui'Length of output: 5963
packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/src/index.ts (8)
1-1: LGTM: Main module export.The export of the main Upwork UI integration module follows Angular best practices and is essential for the package's functionality.
2-2: LGTM: Upwork component export.The export of the main Upwork component follows a logical file structure and naming convention.
3-3: LGTM: Upwork authorization component export.The export of the Upwork authorization component is well-named and follows the established file structure.
4-4: LGTM: Transactions component export.The export of the transactions component maintains consistency with the file structure and naming conventions.
5-5: LGTM: Contracts component export.The export of the contracts component is consistent with the established file structure and naming conventions.
6-6: LGTM: Reports component export.The export of the reports component adheres to the consistent file structure and naming conventions.
7-7: LGTM: Sync data selection component export.The export of the sync data selection component follows the established naming conventions and file structure.
1-7: Well-structured barrel file for Upwork UI integration.This index.ts file serves as a well-organized barrel file for the Upwork UI integration package. It follows Angular best practices by:
- Providing a single point of export for all components and the main module.
- Using consistent naming conventions and file structure.
- Implementing the barrel pattern, which simplifies imports in other parts of the application.
The exports cover all necessary aspects of the Upwork integration, including authorization, transactions, contracts, reports, and data synchronization. This structure will make it easier for developers to use and maintain the Upwork integration features.
packages/plugins/integration-hubstaff-ui/src/lib/integration-hubstaff.routes.ts (1)
31-31: Verify the impact of renaming IntegrationHubstaffRoutingModuleThe class has been renamed from
IntegrationHubstaffRoutingModuletoIntegrationHubstaffRoutes. While this change might be part of a larger refactoring effort, it could potentially break imports in other parts of the application if not updated consistently.To ensure this change doesn't introduce breaking changes, please run the following script:
If the script returns any results, those files will need to be updated to use the new class name.
✅ Verification successful
Renaming of IntegrationHubstaffRoutingModule Verified
The renaming from
IntegrationHubstaffRoutingModuletoIntegrationHubstaffRouteshas been successfully propagated across the codebase with no lingering references to the old class name.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining references to IntegrationHubstaffRoutingModule rg "IntegrationHubstaffRoutingModule" --type tsLength of output: 47
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for import statements referencing IntegrationHubstaffRoutingModule rg "from .*IntegrationHubstaffRoutingModule" --type ts # Search for any usage of IntegrationHubstaffRoutes to ensure it's properly integrated rg "IntegrationHubstaffRoutes" --type tsLength of output: 489
packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/jest.config.ts (5)
1-6: LGTM: Basic Jest configuration looks good.The basic setup for the Jest configuration is well-structured and follows best practices:
- The
displayNamematches the package name, aiding in test report identification.- Using a shared Jest preset (
../../../jest.preset.js) ensures consistency across packages.- The
setupFilesAfterEnvcorrectly points to the test setup file.- The
coverageDirectoryis appropriately set for coverage reports.
7-15: LGTM: Transform configuration is properly set up.The transform configuration is correctly set up for an Angular project:
- It uses
jest-preset-angularto handle TypeScript, JavaScript, and HTML files.- The TypeScript configuration file is correctly specified (
<rootDir>/tsconfig.spec.json).- The
stringifyContentPathRegexis properly set to handle HTML and SVG files.
16-16: LGTM: Transform ignore pattern is correctly configured.The
transformIgnorePatternsconfiguration is properly set to allow transformation of.mjsfiles withinnode_modules. This is crucial for ensuring compatibility with modern JavaScript modules.
17-21: LGTM: Snapshot serializers are correctly configured.The
snapshotSerializersconfiguration is properly set up:
- It includes the necessary serializers from
jest-preset-angular.- This configuration ensures that Angular components are correctly serialized for snapshot testing.
1-22: Excellent Jest configuration for the plugin-integration-upwork-ui package.This Jest configuration file is well-structured and follows best practices for testing Angular applications. It includes all necessary components:
- Proper display name and preset configuration
- Correct setup for file transformations
- Appropriate ignore patterns for node_modules
- Essential snapshot serializers for Angular components
The use of shared presets and configurations promotes consistency across the project. Overall, this configuration provides a solid foundation for testing the plugin-integration-upwork-ui package.
packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/.eslintrc.json (3)
1-3: Verify the ignore pattern configuration.The configuration correctly extends from the root
.eslintrc.json, which is good for maintaining consistency. However, theignorePatternssetting doesn't ignore any files, which is unusual.Please verify if this is intentional. If you want to lint all files, you can remove the
ignorePatternsline. If you meant to ignore some files, update the pattern accordingly.
6-25: TypeScript rules configuration looks good.The configuration for TypeScript files is well-structured:
- It enforces consistent naming conventions for Angular directives and components.
- The use of the "gauzy" prefix aligns with the project's naming convention.
- Extending from Angular and NX ESLint plugins provides a solid foundation of rules.
1-33: Overall, the ESLint configuration is well-structured.The configuration extends from appropriate base configs, sets up rules for Angular components and directives, and includes settings for both TypeScript and HTML files. This provides a solid foundation for maintaining code quality and consistency in the
integration-upwork-uipackage.To further improve:
- Verify the
ignorePatternssetting (line 3).- Consider adding specific rules for HTML templates if needed.
These enhancements will ensure that the linting process is optimized for your project's specific needs.
packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/src/lib/components/reports/reports.component.html (2)
12-12: LGTM: Improved readability of placeholder attributeThe simplification of the placeholder attribute from a multi-line string to a single-line expression enhances code readability without altering functionality. This change is a good practice for maintaining clean and concise templates.
Line range hint
1-40: Overall assessment: Good improvements to template readabilityThe changes made to this template file enhance readability and follow good HTML practices without altering the component's functionality. The simplification of the placeholder attribute and the use of a self-closing tag for the nb-rangepicker are both positive improvements.
To further enhance the code, consider applying consistent self-closing tag syntax throughout the template where appropriate. This will contribute to a more uniform and maintainable codebase.
packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/project.json (2)
1-7: LGTM: Project metadata is well-defined.The project metadata is correctly set up for a plugin integration. The use of a schema (
$schema) is a good practice for maintaining consistency and enabling validation.
1-50: Overall, the project configuration is well-structured and appropriate for an Angular library.The
project.jsonfile for theplugin-integration-upwork-uiproject is correctly set up with all necessary configurations for building, testing, and linting. The suggestions provided in the review comments aim to further enhance the configuration by:
- Adding explanatory comments for TypeScript configurations
- Enabling code coverage for all test runs
- Enhancing the lint configuration with project-specific ESLint rules and including test files
These improvements will contribute to better maintainability and consistency in the development process.
packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/src/lib/integration-upwork.routes.ts (2)
1-8: Imports look good and are properly utilized.The necessary Angular modules and custom components are correctly imported. All imports are used in the routing configuration, indicating good code organization and no unnecessary imports.
58-58: Module export is correct.The
IntegrationUpworkRoutesclass is properly exported as a module. This empty class serving as a container for the routing configuration is a common and accepted pattern in Angular routing modules.packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/package.json (3)
31-35: LGTM! Build scripts are well-defined.The scripts section includes appropriate commands for building the library in development and production configurations, as well as a watch command for live development. This setup follows best practices for Angular library development.
52-56: LGTM! Development dependencies are appropriate.The devDependencies section includes necessary packages for TypeScript development and Jest testing, which is suitable for an Angular-based plugin. The versions used are relatively recent, which is good for maintaining compatibility with modern development practices.
36-39: LGTM! Peer dependencies are correctly specified.The peer dependencies for @angular/common and @angular/core are appropriately defined for an Angular-based plugin.
Consider updating to the latest stable version of Angular if possible. Let's verify the latest version:
If a newer stable version is available, you may want to update the peer dependencies to ensure compatibility with the latest Angular features and improvements.
✅ Verification successful
LGTM! Peer dependencies are correctly specified.
The peer dependencies for
@angular/commonand@angular/coreare appropriately defined for an Angular-based plugin.Please manually verify the latest stable version of Angular and consider updating the peer dependencies to ensure compatibility with the newest features and improvements.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the latest stable version of Angular npm view @angular/core versions --json | jq -r '.[-1]'Length of output: 127
tsconfig.json (1)
14-14: LGTM! Verify the path accuracy.The addition of the path mapping for "@gauzy/plugin-integration-upwork-ui" is correct and follows the existing convention for plugin imports. This change will allow TypeScript to properly resolve imports for the new Upwork UI integration package.
To ensure the path is accurate, please run the following verification script:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Path mapping is accurate
The path mapping for
@gauzy/plugin-integration-upwork-uicorrectly points to./packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/src/index.ts, and the necessary package files are present. This ensures that TypeScript will resolve imports for the new Upwork UI integration package properly.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of the Upwork UI integration package index file # Test: Check if the index.ts file exists at the specified path if [ -f "./packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/src/index.ts" ]; then echo "File exists: ./packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/src/index.ts" else echo "Error: File not found: ./packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/src/index.ts" exit 1 fi # Test: Verify that the package is properly set up if [ -f "./packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/package.json" ]; then echo "Package.json exists for the Upwork UI integration plugin" else echo "Warning: package.json not found for the Upwork UI integration plugin" fiLength of output: 399
packages/plugins/integration-hubstaff-ui/src/lib/integration-hubstaff-ui.module.ts (5)
59-59: IntegrationHubstaffRoutes correctly added to imports.The addition of IntegrationHubstaffRoutes to the imports array is consistent with the earlier import statement change. This ensures that the defined routes are properly included in the module.
Line range hint
1-108: Overall, changes improve module structure and align with best practices.The modifications to this file enhance code organization and readability. The routing approach has been updated, module imports have been restructured, and the TranslateModule configuration has been centralized. These changes align well with Angular best practices.
As a final step, please run the application and navigate through the Hubstaff integration features to ensure that all functionality remains intact after these changes. Pay special attention to routing and internationalization aspects.
28-28: Routing approach updated. Verify implementation.The change from
IntegrationHubstaffRoutingModuletoIntegrationHubstaffRoutessuggests a shift to a more modern routing approach. This aligns well with current Angular best practices.Please ensure that the routing implementation in
integration-hubstaff.routes.tsis correct and all routes are properly defined. Run the following script to verify the routes file:
51-58: TranslateModule configuration centralized. Verify i18n setup.The TranslateModule configuration is now centralized within the @NgModule decorator, which improves code organization. Using
getBrowserLanguage()as the default language is a good practice for internationalization.Please ensure that the internationalization setup is working correctly across the application. Run the following script to verify the presence of translation files:
36-59: Module imports restructured for better clarity. Verify completeness.The restructuring of module imports improves code readability and maintainability by making dependencies explicit. This change aligns well with Angular best practices.
Please ensure that all necessary modules are included and that no required imports were accidentally omitted during this restructuring. Run the following script to compare the current imports with the previous version:
apps/gauzy/src/app/pages/integrations/integrations.module.ts (1)
24-30: Improved module import clarityThe change from using a
NB_MODULESconstant to individually importing Nebular modules enhances code readability and maintainability. While it increases verbosity, it provides better visibility of the exact modules being used in this component.This approach makes it easier to:
- Identify and remove unused modules in the future.
- Understand the component's dependencies at a glance.
- Potentially reduce bundle size by ensuring only necessary modules are imported.
packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/src/lib/components/contracts/contracts.component.ts (3)
3-4: LGTM: Import statements updated appropriatelyThe changes to the import statements look good. Adding
ActivatedRoutesuggests new routing functionality, which aligns with the query parameter handling inngOnInit. Consolidating RxJS imports is a good practice for cleaner and more maintainable code.
180-181: LGTM: Minor improvement in error handlingThe change from
errtoerrorin thecatchErroroperator is a small but positive improvement. It makes the code slightly more readable by using a more descriptive parameter name. This change doesn't affect functionality and aligns with good coding practices.
Line range hint
1-207: Overall changes enhance component functionality and maintainabilityThe changes in this file represent a positive evolution of the
ContractsComponent:
The addition of
ActivatedRouteand the new logic inngOnInitenhance the component's ability to react to URL query parameters. This improvement allows for more dynamic behavior based on the application's navigation state.The consolidation of RxJS imports and the minor improvements in error handling contribute to better code organization and slightly improved readability.
While the change to
anytype forsmartTableSettingsreduces type safety, it may have been necessary for flexibility. However, as suggested earlier, consider using a more specific type to balance flexibility and type safety.These changes collectively improve the component's functionality and maintainability without introducing significant risks or altering its core purpose.
angular.json (1)
362-396: New project configuration for plugin-integration-upwork-ui looks good.The configuration for the new
plugin-integration-upwork-uiproject follows the structure and best practices seen in other project configurations within this file. It includes:
- Correct project type as "library"
- Appropriate root and sourceRoot paths
- Standard Angular build configuration using
@angular-devkit/build-angular:ng-packagr- Test configuration using Karma
- Consistent use of TypeScript configurations for production and development builds
- Proper schematics configuration for components
This addition maintains consistency with other plugin configurations in the project.
packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/src/lib/components/contracts/contracts.component.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/src/lib/integration-upwork-ui.module.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/src/lib/integration-upwork-ui.module.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/src/lib/components/reports/reports.component.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/src/lib/components/reports/reports.component.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/src/lib/components/reports/reports.component.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/src/lib/components/reports/reports.component.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/src/lib/components/reports/reports.component.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
☁️ Nx Cloud ReportCI is running/has finished running commands for commit 3e51829. As they complete they will appear below. Click to see the status, the terminal output, and the build insights. 📂 See all runs for this CI Pipeline Execution
Sent with 💌 from NxCloud. |
PR
Please note: we will close your PR without comment if you do not check the boxes above and provide ALL requested information.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
plugin-integration-upwork-uilibrary for seamless integration with Upwork.Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores