[Fix] UI Core Circular Dependency #8612
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a comprehensive refactoring of the project module management system. It replaces the existing Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant User
participant ProjectListComponent
participant ProjectModuleMutationComponent
participant ProjectModuleService
User->>ProjectListComponent: Initiate Project Module Creation
ProjectListComponent->>ProjectModuleMutationComponent: Open Dialog
ProjectModuleMutationComponent->>User: Display Module Creation Form
User->>ProjectModuleMutationComponent: Fill Module Details
ProjectModuleMutationComponent->>ProjectModuleService: Save Module
ProjectModuleService-->>ProjectModuleMutationComponent: Confirmation
ProjectModuleMutationComponent->>ProjectListComponent: Close Dialog
ProjectListComponent->>User: Refresh Module List
Possibly related PRs
Suggested Reviewers
Poem
Tip CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (7)
packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project-module/project-module-table/project-module-table.component.spec.ts (1)
1-21: Expand testing scope.A basic test verifying the component’s creation is a good start. Consider adding tests for component data bindings, event emitters, and UI interactions to enhance coverage and confidence in any future refactoring.
apps/gauzy/src/app/pages/projects/projects.module.ts (1)
48-48: Double-check the order of imported modules.Positioning the ProjectModuleMutationModule towards the end of the imports array is fine as long as no circular dependencies arise. Consider grouping functionally related modules together for clarity.
packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project-module/project-module-table/project-module-table.component.ts (3)
9-9: Check usage of TranslationBaseComponent
The extension from TranslationBaseComponent suggests we rely on translation features. Ensure that all translation keys are correct and that this component is properly embedded in translation flows.
20-20: Lifecycle management with UntilDestroy
Using @UntilDestroy with { checkProperties: true } is a good way to prevent memory leaks. Validate that it’s used consistently across all components.
237-237: Comment updates
The updated docstring references “Module ID.” Ensure that doc comments remain in sync with the method signature and usage.packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project-module/project-module-mutation/project-module-mutation.component.ts (1)
22-22: distinctUntilChange
This operator prevents redundant triggers. Nice usage. Verify that no side-effects require a re-run if the data remains the same.packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project-module/project-module-table/project-module-table.component.html (1)
20-20: Action buttons for edit/delete modules introduced.
This template addition provides a clear and concise way to manage module actions. If not already implemented, consider adding a confirmation dialog or safety check before permanent deletions.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (16)
apps/gauzy/src/app/pages/projects/components/project-list/list.component.ts(2 hunks)apps/gauzy/src/app/pages/projects/projects.module.ts(2 hunks)packages/ui-core/shared/src/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project-module/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project-module/project-module-mutation/project-module-mutation.component.html(1 hunks)packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project-module/project-module-mutation/project-module-mutation.component.ts(3 hunks)packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project-module/project-module-mutation/project-module-mutation.module.ts(2 hunks)packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project-module/project-module-table/project-module-table.component.html(1 hunks)packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project-module/project-module-table/project-module-table.component.scss(1 hunks)packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project-module/project-module-table/project-module-table.component.spec.ts(1 hunks)packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project-module/project-module-table/project-module-table.component.ts(5 hunks)packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project-module/project-module-table/project-module-table.module.ts(1 hunks)packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project/index.ts(0 hunks)packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project/project-module/index.ts(0 hunks)packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project/project-mutation/project-mutation.component.ts(5 hunks)packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project/project-mutation/project-mutation.module.ts(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project/project-module/index.ts
- packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project/index.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project-module/project-module-table/project-module-table.component.scss
- packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project-module/index.ts
🔇 Additional comments (36)
packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project-module/project-module-table/project-module-table.module.ts (2)
1-3: Consolidate imports for clarity.
The import statements are concise and straightforward. Ensure that all imported modules are necessary and used within the module’s declarations or templates to keep the file lean.
[approve]
8-13: Module structure looks consistent.
Declaring and exporting the component in the same module is a good practice, and it aligns with Angular’s style guide. Well done!
packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project-module/project-module-mutation/project-module-mutation.module.ts (3)
19-23: Imports appear accurate.
Switching to more direct import paths (e.g., '../../tasks') is a good step for maintainability. Make sure the updated paths resolve properly across all references.
[approve]
50-51: Component declarations are consistent with naming.
Declaring the new ProjectModuleMutationComponent is consistent with the updated naming scheme. This clarity helps streamline your module’s purpose.
53-53: Exporting the module fosters reusability.
Exporting ProjectModuleMutationModule supports modular design and allows other parts of the application to reuse this mutation logic seamlessly.
apps/gauzy/src/app/pages/projects/projects.module.ts (2)
19-19: Use the new ProjectModuleMutationModule wherever AddProjectModuleDialogModule was referenced.
Ensure any references to the old AddProjectModuleDialogModule or AddProjectModuleDialogComponent have been replaced both here and in related files for a clean refactor.
✅ Verification successful
Let me search for any remaining references to the old module and component to verify if they have been completely replaced.
Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response:
The refactoring has been completed successfully
The search results show that:
- There are no remaining references to
AddProjectModuleDialogModuleorAddProjectModuleDialogComponentin the codebase - The new
ProjectModuleMutationModuleis properly integrated in:- apps/gauzy/src/app/pages/projects/projects.module.ts
- packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project-module/project-module-table/project-module-table.module.ts
- And used consistently across related components
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Error: No shell scripts found
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any references to the old module and component
rg -i "AddProjectModuleDialog(Module|Component)" -A 2
Length of output: 55
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for all imports and usages of ProjectModuleMutationModule
rg -i "ProjectModuleMutation(Module|Component)" -A 2
Length of output: 5681
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for any dialog-related files that might contain the old references
fd -e ts "project.*dialog|project.*module"
Length of output: 3446
40-40: Assess necessity of NgxPermissionsModule.forChild().
Confirm that child module permission checks remain necessary; otherwise, consider removing or shifting permission checks to a higher-level module to reduce complexity.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather information about the usage of NgxPermissionsModule in the codebase to assess its necessity.
Let me search for permission-related usage specifically in the projects module and its components.
Based on the findings, I can now generate the final response since we have sufficient evidence that permissions are actively used in the projects module through route guards and the module requires permission checks for various operations.
NgxPermissionsModule is necessary - keep it.
The module requires permission checks as evidenced by:
- Route guards (
PermissionsGuard) are used to protect project routes - Multiple routes have specific permission requirements defined in their route data
- Project creation, editing, and listing are all protected by permissions
The permission module is essential for enforcing access control in the projects feature and should be retained.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Error: No shell scripts found
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for NgxPermissionsModule usage in the codebase
rg "NgxPermissionsModule" -B 2 -A 2
# Search for permission-related directives or guards
rg "ngxPermissions" -B 2 -A 2
# Look for permission checks in the projects module
fd "projects" --type f --exec rg "permission" -B 2 -A 2 {}
Length of output: 65827
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for permission-related code in projects module files
fd "projects" --type f --exec rg -l "permission|Permission" {} \;
# Search for permission checks in projects components
ast-grep --pattern 'ngxPermissions' apps/gauzy/src/app/pages/projects/
# Look for permission guards in projects routing
rg "canActivate|PermissionGuard" apps/gauzy/src/app/pages/projects/ -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 1788
packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project/project-mutation/project-mutation.module.ts (3)
26-26: Looks Good: New import of ProjectModuleTableModule
This import seamlessly integrates the ProjectModuleTable features into the ProjectMutationModule. No issues spotted.
59-60: Good addition of SmartDataViewLayoutModule and ProjectModuleTableModule
By adding these modules, you ensure that relevant layout directives, components, and table functionalities are available for the ProjectMutationModule without duplicating code.
32-32: Check if all needed declarations are present
You’ve removed declarations for any table components from this module. Confirm that those components (e.g., ProjectModuleTableComponent) are now correctly declared in ProjectModuleTableModule. If they are, then there’s no issue.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather information about the declarations in both modules to verify this concern.
Let me try a different approach using ripgrep to search for these components and modules.
Table component is correctly declared in its own module
Based on the search results, I can confirm that the ProjectModuleTableComponent is properly declared in its own module (ProjectModuleTableModule). The component is both declared and exported in packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project-module/project-module-table/project-module-table.module.ts, and this module is correctly imported in the ProjectMutationModule. Therefore, the removal of table component declarations from ProjectMutationModule is valid.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Error: No shell scripts found
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for ProjectModuleTableComponent declarations in both modules
ast-grep --pattern 'declarations: [$$$]'
# Also search for the component class definition to ensure it exists
ast-grep --pattern 'class ProjectModuleTableComponent'
# Search for any file containing ProjectModuleTableModule
fd "ProjectModuleTableModule"
Length of output: 129
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for ProjectModuleTableComponent in the codebase
rg "ProjectModuleTableComponent" -A 2 -B 2
# Search for ProjectModuleTableModule in the codebase
rg "ProjectModuleTableModule" -A 2 -B 2
# Look for any module files containing table-related declarations
rg "declarations.*Table" -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 9318
packages/ui-core/shared/src/index.ts (1)
50-50: Exporting project-module subdirectory
Exporting “project-module” publicly allows broader usage of the newly refactored modules and components. Make sure this does not inadvertently expose anything internal that you may want to keep private.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather information about the project-module exports and its contents to verify the exposure concerns.
This will help us understand:
- What files exist in the project-module directory
- What exactly is being exported
- If there are any explicitly marked internal/private components
Let me check the index file and any potential barrel files to fully understand what's being exposed.
This will help us understand:
- The exact exports from the main index file
- Any type definitions that might be exposed
- The presence of additional barrel files that might affect the exposure
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
Project module exports appear to be appropriately scoped
The exports are limited to four well-defined Angular components and modules that appear to be intentionally designed for public consumption:
- ProjectModuleMutationComponent and its module
- ProjectModuleTableComponent and its module
All internal implementation details remain properly encapsulated through TypeScript's private modifiers, and no sensitive interfaces or internal types are being exposed. The exports align with typical Angular architectural patterns for feature modules.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Error: No shell scripts found
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the contents of project-module directory
fd project-module -t f
# Look for exports in project-module
rg "export" packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project-module -A 2
# Check if there are any internal or private markers in the code
rg -i "internal|private" packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project-module
Length of output: 8457
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the main index file content
cat packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project-module/index.ts
# Check for any interfaces or types being exported
rg "interface|type" packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project-module
# Look for any barrel files that might be re-exporting
fd index.ts -p packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project-module
Length of output: 2393
packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project-module/project-module-table/project-module-table.component.ts (11)
17-18: DeleteConfirmationComponent & ProjectModuleMutationComponent imports
These imports reflect expected functionality: deletion dialogs and project module mutation. No issues found.
27-32: Public variables for UI interactions
Exposing these variables as public fields is standard. Just confirm they’re only manipulated by the template or the class itself.
38-42: Input setter approach
The setter for projectId properly triggers loadModules(). This is a neat pattern. Confirm that changes in loadModules are properly handled if projectId flips back and forth.
58-60: Simplified onInit
The approach of calling _applyTranslationOnSmartTable and _loadSmartTableSettings inside ngOnInit is concise. Ensure no logic or side-effect was dropped from the earlier approach.
105-105: Renamed method: _loadSmartTableSettings
Renaming from “loadSmartTable” to “_loadSmartTableSettings” clarifies that it’s an internal method. Good practice. No issues spotted.
252-261: Translation subscription approach
plyYou are subscribing to onLangChange and calling _loadSmartTableSettings each time. This ensures dynamic i18n. Good job keeping the subscription unsubscribed automatically via untilDestroyed.
216-216: Edit dialog with ProjectModuleMutationComponent
Replacing AddProjectModuleDialogComponent with ProjectModuleMutationComponent aligns with the rename. Check for references to the old component in tests or usage.
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate shell scripts to verify the component rename and check for any remaining references to the old component name.
Component rename verification completed - no remaining references found
The search results confirm that there are no remaining references to AddProjectModuleDialogComponent in the codebase, including test files. The new ProjectModuleMutationComponent is properly referenced in relevant files. The rename appears to have been implemented consistently.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Error: No shell scripts found
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to AddProjectModuleDialogComponent
rg "AddProjectModuleDialogComponent" -l
# Search for all references to ProjectModuleMutationComponent to verify the rename
rg "ProjectModuleMutationComponent" -l
# Search for test files that might reference the old component name
fd "\.spec\.ts$" --exec rg "AddProjectModuleDialogComponent" {}
Length of output: 622
11-16: Table-components import
Importing multiple custom cell components (StatusViewComponent, ToggleSwitcherComponent, etc.) is fine. Confirm that the newly introduced references match their declared modules.
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the imports by checking the table-components directory and the component declarations.
Based on the index.ts content from the table-components directory, I can verify that all the imported components are correctly exported from their respective paths:
- StatusViewComponent from './status-view/status-view.component'
- ToggleSwitcherComponent from './toggle-switcher/toggle-switcher.component'
- DateViewComponent from './date-view/date-view.component'
- EmployeesMergedTeamsComponent from './employees-merged-teams/employees-merged-teams.component'
- EmployeeWithLinksComponent from './employee-with-links/employee-with-links.component'
Import references are correctly declared
All the components being imported are properly exported through the table-components barrel file, confirming that the import statement is valid and matches the declared modules.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Error: No shell scripts found
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# First, let's check if these components exist in the table-components directory
fd -e ts "StatusViewComponent|ToggleSwitcherComponent|DateViewComponent|EmployeesMergedTeamsComponent|EmployeeWithLinksComponent" packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/table-components
# Let's also check the actual content of the table-components index or barrel file
fd -g "*index.ts" packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/table-components -x cat {}
# As a backup, let's search for these component declarations in the entire codebase
ast-grep --pattern 'export class $_(Component) { $$$ }'
Length of output: 3228
2-3: Validate the newly introduced imports
The addition of “first, firstValueFrom, tap” from 'rxjs' and “NbDialogService” from '@nebular/theme' looks appropriate for the usage. Confirm these imports aren’t duplicating any existing functionality.
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the imports by checking their usage in the codebase.
Let me check the actual usage of these imports in the component to validate they're not duplicates.
Imports are correctly used and not duplicated
The verification shows that all newly added imports are actively used in the component:
firstValueFromis used multiple times for converting observables to promises in async operationsfirstoperator is used with dialog's onClose observabletapoperator is used with translateService's onLangChangeNbDialogServiceis properly injected in constructor and used for opening dialogs
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Error: No shell scripts found
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for existing imports of these operators/services in the same file
rg -A 3 "import.*\{.*(?:first|firstValueFrom|tap).*\}.*from 'rxjs'" "packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project-module/project-module-table/project-module-table.component.ts"
# Check for existing NbDialogService imports in the same file
rg "import.*NbDialogService.*from '@nebular/theme'" "packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project-module/project-module-table/project-module-table.component.ts"
# Check usage of these operators and service in the component
ast-grep --pattern 'class ProjectModuleTableComponent {
$$$
constructor($$$) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 728
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for usage of firstValueFrom, first, tap operators
rg -B 2 -A 2 "(?:first\(|firstValueFrom|tap\()" "packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project-module/project-module-table/project-module-table.component.ts"
# Check for NbDialogService usage in constructor and methods
rg -B 2 -A 2 "private.*dialogService|this\.dialogService" "packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project-module/project-module-table/project-module-table.component.ts"
Length of output: 2085
24-24: styleUrl -> styleUrls
Ensure the property name is “styleUrls” (plural) if you intend to specify multiple or an array. If that was a rename from “stylesUrls,” confirm the template references.
50-53: Dependency injection
All dependencies (DialogService, ToastrService, OrganizationProjectModuleService) look correct for the new functionality. Make sure no leftover references remain for the removed components.
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify if there are any leftover references to removed components by analyzing the codebase.
Let me analyze the usage of these dependencies in the file to verify if there are any leftover references.
Let me try a different pattern to check the usage of these services.
Based on the search results, I can now verify the usage of these dependencies in the file. The code shows that all three services are actively used:
-
dialogServiceis used for opening dialogs:- Delete confirmation dialog
- Project module mutation dialog
-
toastrServiceis used for displaying notifications:- Success messages for module updates
- Error messages when something goes wrong
-
organizationProjectModuleServiceis used for:- Fetching modules
- Deleting modules
- Updating modules
All these services are properly used in the component's methods and there are no unused references. Therefore, I can generate the final response:
Dependencies are correctly used and no leftover references found
All injected services (DialogService, ToastrService, OrganizationProjectModuleService) are actively used in the component's functionality with no unused or leftover references.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Error: No shell scripts found
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# First, let's check the entire file content to understand the context and usage
fd "project-module-table.component.ts" --exec cat {}
# Then, let's look for any potential unused imports or references in this file
rg -l "DialogService|ToastrService|OrganizationProjectModuleService" --type ts
# Let's also check for any potential dead code or unused references
ast-grep --pattern 'import { $$$ } from "$_"'
Length of output: 65867
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any unused imports in the file
ast-grep --pattern 'import { $$$, DialogService, ToastrService, OrganizationProjectModuleService, $$$ } from "$_"'
# Let's check for actual usage of these services in the file
ast-grep --pattern '$$$DialogService$$$'
ast-grep --pattern '$$$ToastrService$$$'
ast-grep --pattern '$$$OrganizationProjectModuleService$$$'
Length of output: 202
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for actual usage of the services in the component methods
rg "dialogService\." --type ts
rg "toastrService\." --type ts
rg "organizationProjectModuleService\." --type ts
# Check the specific file for these service usages
rg "dialogService|toastrService|organizationProjectModuleService" packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project-module/project-module-table/project-module-table.component.ts
Length of output: 67876
packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project-module/project-module-mutation/project-module-mutation.component.ts (4)
32-33: TranslationBaseComponent & richTextCKEditorConfig
The logic for pulling in a custom CKEditor config is consistent with the product approach. Looks good.
Line range hint 50-53: Constructor changes
Updating the NbDialogRef to reference ProjectModuleMutationComponent is correct. Does not appear to break existing logic.
94-94: Injecting updated dependencies
No issues spotted with the constructor injection. Keep an eye out for references to the old dialog.
✅ Verification successful
Let me search for any references to the old dialog to verify this properly.
Let me check specifically for any references to old dialog types in the project-module-mutation component and its related files.
No migration issues with dialog injection
The component correctly uses NbDialogRef from @nebular/theme and there are no references to any old dialog implementations. The injection in the constructor is properly typed and matches the import statement.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Error: No shell scripts found
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for dialog-related imports and usages in the project
rg -l "NbDialogRef|MatDialogRef" --type ts
# Search for dialog service imports and usages
rg -l "NbDialogService|MatDialog" --type ts
Length of output: 19892
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the specific component file for dialog references
rg "DialogRef|Dialog" packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project-module/project-module-mutation/project-module-mutation.component.ts -A 2 -B 2
# Check for any imports in the component
rg "^import.*Dialog" packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project-module/project-module-mutation/project-module-mutation.component.ts
Length of output: 758
41-41: Class rename
Renaming from AddProjectModuleDialogComponent to ProjectModuleMutationComponent. Ensure references throughout the code are updated.
✅ Verification successful
Let me search for references to both the old and new class names to verify if all references have been properly updated.
Let me check the actual content of these files to verify how the component is being referenced and ensure all usages have been updated correctly.
Class rename has been properly implemented across the codebase
The search results show that the old class name AddProjectModuleDialogComponent is not referenced anywhere in the codebase, while the new name ProjectModuleMutationComponent is properly used in all relevant files:
- Imported and used in dialog openings in table and project components
- Properly declared and exported in its module
- Referenced correctly in component selectors
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Error: No shell scripts found
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for old class name references
echo "=== Searching for AddProjectModuleDialogComponent ==="
rg "AddProjectModuleDialogComponent" -l
echo -e "\n=== Searching for ProjectModuleMutationComponent ==="
rg "ProjectModuleMutationComponent" -l
# Search for potential component selectors or template references
echo -e "\n=== Searching for kebab-case variations ==="
rg "add-project-module-dialog" -l
rg "project-module-mutation" -l
Length of output: 1520
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check content of files that reference ProjectModuleMutationComponent
echo "=== Checking project-module-table.component.ts ==="
rg -A 3 -B 3 "ProjectModuleMutationComponent" "packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project-module/project-module-table/project-module-table.component.ts"
echo -e "\n=== Checking project-mutation.component.ts ==="
rg -A 3 -B 3 "ProjectModuleMutationComponent" "packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project/project-mutation/project-mutation.component.ts"
echo -e "\n=== Checking list.component.ts ==="
rg -A 3 -B 3 "ProjectModuleMutationComponent" "apps/gauzy/src/app/pages/projects/components/project-list/list.component.ts"
echo -e "\n=== Checking project-module-mutation.module.ts ==="
rg -A 3 -B 3 "ProjectModuleMutationComponent" "packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project-module/project-module-mutation/project-module-mutation.module.ts"
Length of output: 3221
apps/gauzy/src/app/pages/projects/components/project-list/list.component.ts (2)
38-38: Ensure module import alignment with NgModule declarations.
The newly introduced "ProjectModuleMutationComponent" import looks correct. Please verify that the corresponding NgModule imports are updated to ensure the component is declared or exported in the relevant modules, preventing potential runtime injection errors.
✅ Verification successful
Component is properly declared and exported in its module
The ProjectModuleMutationComponent is correctly declared and exported in the ProjectModuleMutationModule. The module configuration follows Angular best practices with the component being both declared in the declarations array and exposed through the exports array, making it available for use in other modules that import ProjectModuleMutationModule.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify that ProjectModuleMutationComponent is properly declared or exported in a matching NgModule
rg -A 6 'ProjectModuleMutationComponent' | grep -i 'NgModule'
Length of output: 176
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the module declaration details
cat packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project-module/project-module-mutation/project-module-mutation.module.ts
Length of output: 1680
623-623: Check for legacy references to the old dialog component.
Switching from "AddProjectModuleDialogComponent" to "ProjectModuleMutationComponent" is consistent with the new refactoring. Please confirm that all references to the old component are removed throughout the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
No legacy references to AddProjectModuleDialogComponent found
The verification shows that:
- The old
AddProjectModuleDialogComponentis completely removed from the codebase with no remaining references - The new
ProjectModuleMutationComponentis properly integrated in multiple locations:- Main component in
packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project-module/project-module-mutation/ - Used in project list component (the file under review)
- Used in project mutation component
- Used in project module table component
- Main component in
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Searching for any leftover references to the old AddProjectModuleDialogComponent
rg -A 5 'AddProjectModuleDialogComponent'
Length of output: 41
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for both components to understand the transition
echo "=== Searching for ProjectModuleMutationComponent ==="
rg -A 2 "ProjectModuleMutationComponent"
echo -e "\n=== Searching for any imports of AddProjectModuleDialogComponent ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'import { $$$ AddProjectModuleDialogComponent $$$ } from $path'
echo -e "\n=== Searching for any class declarations of AddProjectModuleDialogComponent ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'class AddProjectModuleDialogComponent $$$'
Length of output: 4897
packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project/project-mutation/project-mutation.component.ts (6)
5-5: New NbDialogService import recognized.
This import ensures that dialog services can be injected properly into the component. No issues found.
50-50: ProjectModuleMutationComponent import aligned with the new design.
Importing ProjectModuleMutationComponent here matches the recent refactoring away from AddProjectModuleDialogComponent. Looks good.
310-310: Safe check for undefined project members.
Using "project.members || []" avoids potential null or undefined errors when accessing members, improving robustness.
317-317: Consistent null-safe approach for manager IDs.
This mirrors the logic for employees to ensure that member data is handled safely, preventing runtime errors. Good job.
345-345: Null-safe handling of teams.
Applying "(this.project.teams || [])" is consistent with your handling of project.members. This helps prevent undefined reference errors.
724-724: Ensuring uniform usage of the new project module dialog.
Opening "ProjectModuleMutationComponent" aligns with the updated approach. Confirm there are no further references to the old AddProjectModuleDialogComponent in this or other files.
✅ Verification successful
ProjectModuleMutationComponent is consistently used across the codebase
The search results confirm that ProjectModuleMutationComponent is the only dialog component being used for project module operations throughout the codebase. There are no references to the old AddProjectModuleDialogComponent, and all instances of project module dialog usage consistently use ProjectModuleMutationComponent. The implementation is uniform across:
- Project list component
- Project module table component
- Project mutation component
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Double-checking for occurrences of the old AddProjectModuleDialogComponent
rg -A 5 'AddProjectModuleDialogComponent'
Length of output: 41
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more comprehensive search for any dialog components related to project modules
rg -i "project.*module.*dialog|module.*dialog.*component"
# Also search for any imports containing similar patterns
rg -i "import.*project.*module.*dialog|import.*module.*dialog.*component"
# Let's also check the specific component being opened
ast-grep --pattern 'ProjectModuleMutationComponent'
Length of output: 2644
packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project-module/project-module-table/project-module-table.component.html (1)
16-16: No issues found with table layout update.
The smart-table closing tag rearrangement is purely structural. No functional concerns identified.
packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project-module/project-module-mutation/project-module-mutation.component.html (1)
102-102: Managers and organization sprints selection are well integrated.
The new multi-select for managers and sprints aligns nicely with existing patterns. Be sure to handle empty or null arrays gracefully when binding data in the component logic.
...e/shared/src/lib/project-module/project-module-mutation/project-module-mutation.component.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit a513a21.
☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at |
PR
Please note: we will close your PR without comment if you do not check the boxes above and provide ALL requested information.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Tests