[Feat] update relationship between module and member #8558
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant changes to the organization project module structure, including the creation of a new Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
☁️ Nx Cloud ReportCI is running/has finished running commands for commit 70d19bf. As they complete they will appear below. Click to see the status, the terminal output, and the build insights. 📂 See all runs for this CI Pipeline Execution ✅ Successfully ran 1 targetSent with 💌 from NxCloud. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
packages/core/src/organization-project-module/organization-project-module-employee.entity.ts (1)
70-70: EnsureemployeeIdreflects the required relationshipThe
employeeIdproperty is marked as optional (employeeId?: ID;), but it's associated with a mandatory relationship toEmployee(employee!: IEmployee;). IfemployeeIdis required, remove the optional modifier to reflect its necessity.Apply this diff to update the property:
- employeeId?: ID; + employeeId: ID;packages/core/src/organization-project-module/organization-project-module.service.ts (4)
Line range hint
88-116: Update theupdatemethod to handle members and managersThe
updatemethod currently does not processmemberIdsormanagerIds, which are handled in thecreatemethod. To ensure consistency and proper management of module members during updates, consider incorporating logic to handle updates tomembersandmanagers.
Line range hint
109-109: Remove console log statement used for debuggingThe
console.logstatement on line 109 is used for debugging and may expose sensitive SQL queries in logs. It is advisable to remove this statement or replace it with a proper logging mechanism with appropriate log levels.Apply this diff to remove the debugging statement:
- console.log('Get Employees modules', query.getSql()); // Query logs for debugging
Line range hint
196-196: Remove console log statement used for debuggingThe
console.logstatement on line 196 may leak sensitive information and should be removed or replaced with a secure logging mechanism.Apply this diff to remove the debugging statement:
- console.log('Get Team modules', query.getSql()); // Query logs for debugging
Line range hint
117-118: Avoid exposing entire error objects in exceptionsThrowing exceptions with the entire error object can inadvertently expose sensitive information. Consider only passing the error message or a generic message to prevent information leakage.
Apply this diff to modify exception handling:
- throw new BadRequestException(error); + throw new BadRequestException(error.message); ... - throw new HttpException( - `Error while retrieving employee project modules: ${error.message}`, - HttpStatus.BAD_REQUEST - ); + throw new BadRequestException('Error while retrieving employee project modules.');Also applies to: 208-210
packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project/project-module/add-project-module-dialog/add-project-module-dialog.component.html (1)
108-113: Consider adding a tooltip for manager selection.The switch to multi-select for managers is a significant UX change. Consider adding a tooltip to inform users that they can now select multiple managers.
<ga-employee-multi-select [selectedEmployeeIds]="selectedManagerIds" [allEmployees]="employees" class="employees" + nbTooltip="You can now select multiple managers" (selectedChange)="onManagersSelected($event)" ></ga-employee-multi-select>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
packages/contracts/src/organization-project-module.model.ts(3 hunks)packages/core/src/core/entities/index.ts(2 hunks)packages/core/src/core/entities/internal.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/database/migrations/1733140380074-UpdateModuleToMemberRelationship.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/employee/employee.entity.ts(2 hunks)packages/core/src/organization-project-module/organization-project-module-employee.entity.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/organization-project-module/organization-project-module.entity.ts(3 hunks)packages/core/src/organization-project-module/organization-project-module.module.ts(2 hunks)packages/core/src/organization-project-module/organization-project-module.service.ts(3 hunks)packages/core/src/organization-project-module/repository/mikro-orm-organization-project-module-employee.repository.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/organization-project-module/repository/type-orm-organization-project-module-employee.repository.ts(1 hunks)packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project/project-module/add-project-module-dialog/add-project-module-dialog.component.html(2 hunks)packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project/project-module/add-project-module-dialog/add-project-module-dialog.component.ts(7 hunks)packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project/project-module/module-table/project-module-table.component.ts(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project/project-module/module-table/project-module-table.component.ts
🔇 Additional comments (15)
packages/core/src/database/migrations/1733140380074-UpdateModuleToMemberRelationship.ts (1)
1-647: Migration script appears correct
The migration script properly updates the database schema to reflect the new relationships between modules and employees across different database types. The SQL queries and foreign key constraints are appropriately handled.
packages/core/src/organization-project-module/organization-project-module.module.ts (3)
12-15: LGTM: New imports are properly structured
The new imports for Role, Employee modules, and the new OrganizationProjectModuleEmployee entity/repository are correctly organized and aligned with the module's enhanced functionality.
25-26: LGTM: ORM configurations properly updated
The TypeORM and MikroORM configurations are correctly updated to include the new OrganizationProjectModuleEmployee entity, and the required Role and Employee modules are properly imported.
Also applies to: 29-30
34-45: LGTM: Provider and export configurations are complete
The new TypeOrmOrganizationProjectModuleEmployeeRepository is properly registered as a provider and exported, maintaining consistency with the module's architecture.
packages/contracts/src/organization-project-module.model.ts (3)
30-30: LGTM: Updated member relationship type
The members property is correctly updated to use IOrganizationProjectModuleEmployee[], reflecting the new many-to-many relationship structure.
36-44: LGTM: Well-structured employee-module relationship interface
The new IOrganizationProjectModuleEmployee interface properly extends the required base interfaces and includes all necessary properties for managing the relationship between employees and project modules.
61-63: LGTM: Input interfaces properly updated
The create and update input interfaces are correctly modified to support member management through IMemberEntityBased extension.
Also applies to: 65-65
packages/core/src/core/entities/index.ts (1)
87-87: LGTM: Entity properly registered
The OrganizationProjectModuleEmployee entity is correctly added to both the imports and coreEntities array, maintaining alphabetical order and consistency.
Also applies to: 239-239
packages/core/src/core/entities/internal.ts (1)
90-90: LGTM: Export statement correctly added
The new export statement for the organization-project-module-employee entity is properly placed and follows the established pattern.
packages/core/src/employee/employee.entity.ts (1)
538-542: LGTM: Relationship properly defined
The one-to-many relationship between Employee and OrganizationProjectModuleEmployee is correctly implemented with appropriate cascade settings. This change aligns with the PR objective of updating the module-member relationship.
Let's verify the relationship is consistently implemented on both sides:
✅ Verification successful
Relationship verification complete - Properly implemented on both sides
The bidirectional relationship between Employee and OrganizationProjectModuleEmployee is correctly implemented:
-
In OrganizationProjectModuleEmployee entity:
@MultiORMManyToOne(() => Employee, (it) => it.modules, { onDelete: 'CASCADE' }) employee!: IEmployee;
-
In Employee entity:
@MultiORMOneToMany(() => OrganizationProjectModuleEmployee, (it) => it.employee, { cascade: true }) modules?: IOrganizationProjectModule[];
The relationship is properly defined with matching property names and correct cascade settings on both sides.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the bidirectional relationship implementation
# Check if the inverse side of the relationship is properly defined
ast-grep --pattern 'class OrganizationProjectModuleEmployee {
$$$
@$_(() => Employee)
employee: $_
$$$
}'
# Check for any remaining old relationship patterns that should have been removed
rg -l "ManyToMany.*OrganizationProjectModule.*employee"
Length of output: 173
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify the relationship
# First, let's find the OrganizationProjectModuleEmployee entity file
fd -e ts "OrganizationProjectModuleEmployee.entity"
# Then let's check the content of the file to verify the relationship
rg -A 5 -B 5 "@.*Employee" --type ts
# Also check for any ManyToOne relationships to Employee
rg -A 5 -B 5 "@ManyToOne.*Employee" --type ts
# And check for any remaining ManyToMany relationships that should have been migrated
rg -A 5 -B 5 "@ManyToMany.*OrganizationProjectModule" --type ts
Length of output: 67181
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's find the OrganizationProjectModuleEmployee entity file and check its relationship definitions
# Search for the entity file
fd -t f "OrganizationProjectModuleEmployee.entity.ts"
# Check the content of the file if found
rg -A 10 -B 10 "class OrganizationProjectModuleEmployee" --type ts
# Also check for any ManyToOne relationship with Employee in this specific entity
rg -A 5 -B 5 "@.*ManyToOne.*Employee.*OrganizationProjectModuleEmployee" --type ts
# And check for the inverse side relationship in the Employee entity
rg -A 5 -B 5 "@.*OneToMany.*OrganizationProjectModuleEmployee" --type ts
Length of output: 5436
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the ManyToOne relationship in OrganizationProjectModuleEmployee entity
# Search for the employee relationship in the OrganizationProjectModuleEmployee entity
rg -A 10 -B 10 "@.*ManyToOne.*Employee.*employee" packages/core/src/organization-project-module/organization-project-module-employee.entity.ts
# Also check for the organizationProjectModule relationship
rg -A 10 -B 10 "@.*ManyToOne.*OrganizationProjectModule.*organizationProjectModule" packages/core/src/organization-project-module/organization-project-module-employee.entity.ts
Length of output: 323
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the relationships in the OrganizationProjectModuleEmployee entity
# Get the entire content of the entity file to examine all relationships
cat packages/core/src/organization-project-module/organization-project-module-employee.entity.ts
# Also check for any references to this entity in imports
rg "from.*organization-project-module-employee" --type ts
Length of output: 4840
packages/core/src/organization-project-module/organization-project-module.entity.ts (2)
19-21: LGTM! Import changes align with the new relationship structure.
The addition of ID and IOrganizationProjectModuleEmployee imports supports the new relationship model.
236-240: Verify cascade behavior in deletion scenarios.
The change from many-to-many to one-to-many with cascade enabled is architecturally sound. However, ensure that cascading deletions won't cause unintended data loss.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide a final response regarding the cascade behavior in deletion scenarios:
Cascade deletion behavior is properly configured and safe to use.
The cascade configuration is well-structured with appropriate safeguards:
- The
OrganizationProjectModuleEmployeeentity hasonDelete: 'CASCADE'set on its relationships, ensuring clean removal of member records when a module is deleted - The parent
OrganizationProjectModuleentity has cascade enabled only for the members relationship, which is the correct scope - The deletion cascade chain is contained within the module's own scope and won't propagate to core entities like Employee or Role
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for delete operations in the service layer to ensure proper handling of cascaded deletes
# Search for delete operations in service files
rg -A 5 "delete.*OrganizationProjectModule" --type ts
# Check for any cleanup or removal logic
ast-grep --pattern 'async delete$_($_) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 107
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for deletion-related patterns in the codebase
# Search for delete operations in service and repository files
rg -A 10 "delete.*Organization.*Project.*Module" --type ts
# Search for remove operations
rg -A 10 "remove.*Organization.*Project.*Module" --type ts
# Search for any cascade options in related entities
rg "cascade.*true" --type ts
# Look for the service implementation
fd "organization-project-module.service" --type f --exec cat {}
Length of output: 20938
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the OrganizationProjectModuleEmployee entity and its relationships
# Look for the OrganizationProjectModuleEmployee entity definition
fd "organization-project-module-employee.entity" --type f --exec cat {}
# Search for any delete/remove operations specifically related to OrganizationProjectModuleEmployee
rg -A 10 "delete.*OrganizationProjectModuleEmployee" --type ts
rg -A 10 "remove.*OrganizationProjectModuleEmployee" --type ts
# Check for any onDelete configurations in the relationships
rg "onDelete" --type ts
Length of output: 46047
packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project/project-module/add-project-module-dialog/add-project-module-dialog.component.html (1)
44-47: LGTM! Employee multi-select implementation is correct.
The binding to selectedEmployeeIds and event handling for selection changes are properly implemented.
packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project/project-module/add-project-module-dialog/add-project-module-dialog.component.ts (2)
41-44: LGTM! Clear property declarations for ID management.
The properties are well-defined and their purposes are clear from their names.
319-326: LGTM! Event handlers are properly implemented.
The onManagersSelected and onMembersSelected methods are well-documented and correctly handle the ID arrays.
Also applies to: 339-346
packages/core/src/organization-project-module/organization-project-module-employee.entity.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/core/src/organization-project-module/organization-project-module-employee.entity.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...ation-project-module/repository/mikro-orm-organization-project-module-employee.repository.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...zation-project-module/repository/type-orm-organization-project-module-employee.repository.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
.../lib/project/project-module/add-project-module-dialog/add-project-module-dialog.component.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
.../lib/project/project-module/add-project-module-dialog/add-project-module-dialog.component.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...ui-core/shared/src/lib/project/project-module/module-table/project-module-table.component.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
.../lib/project/project-module/add-project-module-dialog/add-project-module-dialog.component.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/core/src/organization-project-module/organization-project-module.service.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| `CREATE INDEX "IDX_e6b6555e5fc6c5120110a0195c" ON "organization_project_module" ("managerId") ` | ||
| ); | ||
| await queryRunner.query( | ||
| `ALTER TABLE "employee_job_preset" ADD CONSTRAINT "FK_7ae5b4d4bdec77971dab319f2e2" FOREIGN KEY ("jobPresetId") REFERENCES "job_preset"("id") ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@samuelmbabhazi employee_job_preset this is unnecessary changes. Please ask help from @GloireMutaliko21
packages/core/src/organization-project-module/organization-project-module-employee.entity.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/core/src/organization-project-module/organization-project-module.module.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
packages/core/src/employee/employee.entity.ts(2 hunks)packages/core/src/organization-project-module/organization-project-module-employee.entity.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/organization-project-module/repository/mikro-orm-organization-project-module-employee.repository.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/organization-project-module/repository/type-orm-organization-project-module-employee.repository.ts(1 hunks)packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project/project-module/add-project-module-dialog/add-project-module-dialog.component.ts(8 hunks)packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project/project-module/module-table/project-module-table.component.ts(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project/project-module/module-table/project-module-table.component.ts
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- packages/core/src/organization-project-module/repository/mikro-orm-organization-project-module-employee.repository.ts
- packages/core/src/organization-project-module/repository/type-orm-organization-project-module-employee.repository.ts
- packages/ui-core/shared/src/lib/project/project-module/add-project-module-dialog/add-project-module-dialog.component.ts
🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/core/src/organization-project-module/organization-project-module-employee.entity.ts (1)
25-27: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use @IsDate() instead of @IsDateString() for assignedAt
The assignedAt property is of type Date but is decorated with @IsDateString(), which validates string representations of dates. Consider using @IsDate() to properly validate Date objects.
Apply this diff to update the validation decorator:
- @IsDateString()
+ @IsDate()
packages/core/src/organization-project-module/organization-project-module-employee.entity.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
packages/core/src/organization-project-module/organization-project-module-employee.entity.ts (1)
22-30: Reduce code duplication by creating a base relation classThe declarations for
employee,organizationProjectModule, androlerelations have similar patterns and decorators. Consider creating a base class or utilizing a utility function to define these relations to reduce duplication and improve maintainability.Example:
function createRelation<T>( relationType: () => T, options: any = {}, isOptional: boolean = false ) { return function (target: any, propertyKey: string) { MultiORMManyToOne(relationType, options)(target, propertyKey); ApiPropertyOptional({ type: () => String })(target, propertyKey + 'Id'); IsOptional()(target, propertyKey + 'Id'); IsUUID()(target, propertyKey + 'Id'); RelationId((it: any) => it[propertyKey])(target, propertyKey + 'Id'); ColumnIndex()(target, propertyKey + 'Id'); MultiORMColumn({ nullable: isOptional, relationId: true })(target, propertyKey + 'Id'); }; }And then use it in your class:
@createRelation(() => Employee) employee!: IEmployee; employeeId: ID; @createRelation(() => OrganizationProjectModule) organizationProjectModule!: OrganizationProjectModule; organizationProjectModuleId: ID; @createRelation(() => Role, { nullable: true }, true) role?: IRole; roleId?: ID;Also applies to: 62-70, 82-90
packages/core/src/organization-project-module/organization-project-module.service.ts (4)
Line range hint
88-107: Ensure proper error handling and transaction managementWhile the try-catch block handles errors, consider wrapping the database operations within a transaction to ensure consistency, especially if multiple operations depend on each other.
Example using a transaction (assuming TypeORM is used):
await this.typeOrmRepository.manager.transaction(async (manager) => { const projectModule = await manager.save(OrganizationProjectModule, { ...input, members, creatorId }); // Generate the activity log await this.activityLogService.logActivity<OrganizationProjectModule>( BaseEntityEnum.OrganizationProjectModule, ActionTypeEnum.Created, ActorTypeEnum.User, projectModule.id, projectModule.name, projectModule, organizationId, tenantId ); return projectModule; });Ensure that any services called within the transaction are aware of the transaction context.
Line range hint
112-154: Refactor theupdatemethod to handle members and managersThe
updatemethod currently does not handle updatingmembersandmanagerssimilar to thecreatemethod. This could lead to inconsistencies if members or managers need to be updated.Consider refactoring the
updatemethod to include logic for updating members and managers, similar to thecreatemethod.Example:
async update( id: ID, entity: IOrganizationProjectModuleUpdateInput ): Promise<IOrganizationProjectModule | UpdateResult> { const tenantId = RequestContext.currentTenantId() || entity.tenantId; const { memberIds = [], managerIds = [], ...input } = entity; // Similar logic as in create method to handle members and managers // ... // Proceed with update operation // ... }
Line range hint
161-245: Improve query performance and readability ingetEmployeeProjectModulesThe method
getEmployeeProjectModulescontains complex query logic with nested subqueries and conditions. Consider refactoring for better performance and maintainability.Suggestions:
- Use query builder methods to construct queries instead of raw SQL strings.
- Optimize subqueries to minimize performance overhead.
- Add indexes to frequently queried columns like
organizationId,tenantId, andemployeeId.
Line range hint
361-416: Add unit tests for critical service methodsThe service contains several complex methods such as
getEmployeeProjectModulesandfindTeamProjectModules. Adding unit tests would help ensure their correctness.Would you like assistance in setting up unit tests for these methods?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
packages/core/src/organization-project-module/organization-project-module-employee.entity.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/organization-project-module/organization-project-module.module.ts(2 hunks)packages/core/src/organization-project-module/organization-project-module.service.ts(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
packages/core/src/organization-project-module/organization-project-module-employee.entity.ts (4)
17-22: Inconsistent nullability between isManager property and its validation decorators
The isManager property is declared as optional (isManager?: boolean;), and its ORM column is set to nullable: true. However, the @IsOptional() decorator is used, which is appropriate. This is consistent.
62-70: Ensure consistency in nullability between employee and employeeId properties
The employee property is declared as non-nullable (employee!: IEmployee;), indicating it must always be present. However, the employeeId property, which serves as the foreign key relation ID, is also declared as non-nullable (employeeId: ID;). This is consistent.
75-83: Verify the nullability of the role property
The role property is declared as optional (role?: IRole;), and the ORM relation is marked with nullable: true, which is consistent. Ensure that this property can indeed be nullable in your application's logic.
25-29: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using @IsDate() instead of @IsDateString() for assignedAt
The assignedAt property is of type Date but is decorated with @IsDateString(), which validates ISO8601 date strings. Since the property is a Date object, using @IsDate() would be more appropriate to validate Date instances.
Apply this diff to update the validation decorator:
@ApiPropertyOptional({ type: () => Date })
@IsOptional()
- @IsDateString()
+ @IsDate()
@ColumnIndex()
@MultiORMColumn({ nullable: true })
assignedAt?: Date;Likely invalid or redundant comment.
packages/core/src/organization-project-module/organization-project-module.module.ts (4)
25-26: Ensure consistency in ORM module imports
Both TypeOrmModule.forFeature and MikroOrmModule.forFeature include OrganizationProjectModule and OrganizationProjectModuleEmployee, which is correct.
36-38: Verify that the new repository providers are properly registered
The TypeOrmOrganizationProjectModuleEmployeeRepository is added to the providers array. Ensure that this repository is correctly implemented and that there are no naming conflicts.
40-45: Export necessary modules and providers
Make sure that all necessary modules and providers are exported for use in other parts of the application. The additions to the exports array appear appropriate.
13-13:
Fix incorrect import path for EmployeeModule
The import statement for EmployeeModule is incorrect and may cause build failures, especially in Docker environments.
Apply this diff to fix the import path:
import { RoleModule } from '../role/role.module';
-import { EmployeeModule } from 'employee';
+import { EmployeeModule } from '../employee/employee.module';
import { OrganizationProjectModuleEmployee } from './organization-project-module-employee.entity';Likely invalid or redundant comment.
packages/core/src/organization-project-module/organization-project-module.service.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/core/src/organization-project-module/organization-project-module.service.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/core/src/organization-project-module/organization-project-module.service.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
packages/core/src/organization-project-module/organization-project-module.module.ts (1)
34-45: Consider organizing providers and exports alphabetically.The providers and exports are correctly configured but could benefit from alphabetical ordering for better maintainability.
Apply this diff to organize the arrays:
providers: [ + ...CommandHandlers, OrganizationProjectModuleService, TypeOrmOrganizationProjectModuleRepository, - TypeOrmOrganizationProjectModuleEmployeeRepository, - ...CommandHandlers + TypeOrmOrganizationProjectModuleEmployeeRepository ], exports: [ + OrganizationProjectModuleService, TypeOrmModule, - OrganizationProjectModuleService, TypeOrmOrganizationProjectModuleRepository, TypeOrmOrganizationProjectModuleEmployeeRepository ]packages/core/src/organization-project-module/organization-project-module.service.ts (1)
89-90: Consider validating members array.Add validation to ensure the members array is not empty when creating a project module.
Apply this diff before creating the project module:
+if (!members.length) { + throw new BadRequestException('At least one member is required'); +} + const projectModule = await super.create({ ...input, members, creatorId });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
packages/core/src/organization-project-module/organization-project-module.module.ts(2 hunks)packages/core/src/organization-project-module/organization-project-module.service.ts(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
packages/core/src/organization-project-module/organization-project-module.module.ts (3)
12-15: LGTM! Import statements are properly organized.
The new imports for RoleModule, EmployeeModule, and OrganizationProjectModuleEmployee related classes are correctly added and align with the module's enhanced functionality.
25-26: LGTM! Entity registration in ORM modules.
The OrganizationProjectModuleEmployee entity is properly registered in both TypeOrmModule and MikroOrmModule, ensuring consistent database access across different ORM implementations.
29-30: LGTM! Required module dependencies.
RoleModule and EmployeeModule are correctly imported to support the new employee-role relationship functionality.
packages/core/src/organization-project-module/organization-project-module.service.ts (3)
14-15: LGTM! Service dependencies are properly configured.
The new imports and constructor dependencies for RoleService and EmployeeService are correctly added to support the enhanced member management functionality.
Also applies to: 26-28, 35-37
70-85: LGTM! Efficient member creation with role assignment.
The implementation efficiently handles member creation and role assignment:
- Uses Set for O(1) manager lookup
- Properly handles organization and tenant context
- Correctly assigns manager role when applicable
52-69:
Handle potential null manager role.
The manager role retrieval needs error handling to prevent potential null reference issues.
Apply this diff to add error handling:
// Find the manager role
const managerRole = await this._roleService.findOneByWhereOptions({
name: RolesEnum.MANAGER
});
+
+if (!managerRole) {
+ throw new BadRequestException('Manager role not found');
+}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
| await queryRunner.query( | ||
| `ALTER TABLE "organization_project_module" DROP CONSTRAINT "FK_e6b6555e5fc6c5120110a0195cd"` | ||
| ); | ||
| await queryRunner.query(`ALTER TABLE "employee_job_preset" DROP CONSTRAINT "FK_7ae5b4d4bdec77971dab319f2e2"`); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@samuelmbabhazi We don't need employee_job_preset changes in this migration. Please remove it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
packages/core/src/database/migrations/1733140380074-UpdateModuleToMemberRelationship.ts (2)
159-322: Refactor repetitive SQLite migration codeThe
sqliteUpQueryRunnerandsqliteDownQueryRunnermethods contain lengthy and repetitive code blocks, especially with index creation and dropping temporary tables. Consider abstracting common operations into helper functions to improve readability and maintainability.
61-112: Optimize PostgreSQL migration queriesThe SQL queries in the
postgresUpQueryRunnermethod could be formatted for better readability. Also, consider using parameterized queries to prevent potential SQL injection, even though migration files generally run in a controlled environment.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
packages/core/src/core/entities/index.ts(2 hunks)packages/core/src/core/entities/internal.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/database/migrations/1733140380074-UpdateModuleToMemberRelationship.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/employee/employee.entity.ts(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- packages/core/src/core/entities/index.ts
- packages/core/src/core/entities/internal.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
packages/core/src/employee/employee.entity.ts (1)
Learnt from: samuelmbabhazi
PR: ever-co/ever-gauzy#8558
File: packages/core/src/employee/employee.entity.ts:538-542
Timestamp: 2024-12-03T07:45:30.195Z
Learning: In `packages/core/src/employee/employee.entity.ts`, the `modules` property in the `Employee` entity represents the relationship between `Employee` and `OrganizationProjectModule`, and it should be typed as `IOrganizationProjectModule[]`.
🔇 Additional comments (3)
packages/core/src/database/migrations/1733140380074-UpdateModuleToMemberRelationship.ts (1)
15-31: Migration structure is well-handled for multiple databases
The migration file correctly implements the up and down methods, handling different database types (sqlite, postgres, mysql) with appropriate fallbacks and error handling for unsupported types.
packages/core/src/employee/employee.entity.ts (2)
95-95: Import path is correct and follows conventions
The import statement for OrganizationProjectModuleEmployee is correctly specified with the relative path, ensuring proper module resolution.
538-541: Relationship mapping aligns with the data model
The one-to-many relationship between Employee and OrganizationProjectModuleEmployee is appropriately defined. The modules property correctly represents the relationship to IOrganizationProjectModule[], as intended.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
packages/core/src/database/migrations/1733304689932-UpdateMembersRelationToProjectModule.ts (2)
114-185: Consider refactoring repeated SQL statements in SQLite migrationThe
sqliteUpQueryRunnermethod contains repetitive SQL operations, particularly in creating and dropping temporary tables and indexes. Consider refactoring this code to improve readability and maintainability. Utilizing helper functions or parameterized queries could reduce duplication.
271-281: Check for consistency in MySQL migration index namesIn the
mysqlUpQueryRunnermethod, verify that the index names comply with the naming conventions used elsewhere in the project. Consistent naming aids in maintainability and reduces confusion during future migrations or debugging.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
packages/core/src/database/migrations/1733304689932-UpdateMembersRelationToProjectModule.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
packages/core/src/database/migrations/1733304689932-UpdateMembersRelationToProjectModule.ts (2)
16-32: Efficient handling of database-specific migrations
The switch statement in the up method correctly delegates the migration logic to the appropriate database-specific methods based on the connection type. This ensures that the migration handles different database systems effectively.
62-80: Verify SQL statements for compatibility and syntax errors
The SQL queries in postgresUpQueryRunner involve complex operations such as altering tables, dropping constraints, and creating indexes. Please verify that these queries are free of syntax errors and compatible with the target PostgreSQL versions.
Run the following script to check for syntax errors in the PostgreSQL migration queries:
Ensure to replace your_username and your_database with your actual PostgreSQL username and database name.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the analysis of the SQL statements and related migrations, I can now provide a final response:
SQL statements are valid and follow established patterns in the codebase
The migration's SQL statements are well-structured and consistent with the codebase's patterns:
- All table and constraint names follow the established naming convention
- Foreign key relationships are properly defined with appropriate ON DELETE/UPDATE actions
- The migration handles both PostgreSQL and SQLite/MySQL syntax variations
- Index creation follows the same pattern as other migrations
- The table structure matches similar employee relation tables in the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check SQL syntax for PostgreSQL migration queries
# Extract SQL queries from the migration file
grep -E 'queryRunner\.query\(`.*`\);' packages/core/src/database/migrations/1733304689932-UpdateMembersRelationToProjectModule.ts | sed -E 's/.*queryRunner\.query\(`(.*)`\);/\1/' > postgres_queries.sql
# Use PostgreSQL's 'psql' with '--dry-run' option to check syntax (Assuming local PostgreSQL installation)
psql --username=your_username --dbname=your_database --no-commands --file=postgres_queries.sql
Length of output: 372
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's analyze the SQL statements by checking:
# 1. If similar table structures exist in other migrations
# 2. If the referenced tables and constraints exist
# 3. If similar patterns are used in other migrations
# Check for similar table structures and patterns
fd -e ts -e sql . packages/core/src/database/migrations/ -x grep -l "organization_project_module"
# Look for referenced tables
fd -e ts -e sql . packages/core/src/database/migrations/ -x grep -l "tenant\|organization\|employee\|role"
# Check for similar migration patterns
rg "DROP CONSTRAINT.*DROP INDEX.*CREATE TABLE" packages/core/src/database/migrations/
Length of output: 16509
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's analyze the specific migration file and related ones to verify SQL patterns
# Check the specific migration file content
rg -A 2 "queryRunner\.query" packages/core/src/database/migrations/1733304689932-UpdateMembersRelationToProjectModule.ts
# Check the original table creation migration
rg -A 5 "organization_project_module" packages/core/src/database/migrations/1724929664505-CreateProjectModuleTable.ts
# Look for similar table relationship migrations for validation
rg "CREATE TABLE.*employee.*CONSTRAINT.*FOREIGN KEY.*REFERENCES" packages/core/src/database/migrations/
Length of output: 80241
| await queryRunner.query(`ALTER TABLE "organization_project_module_employee" DROP CONSTRAINT "FK_5f4b71530d53181987bea86a938"`); | ||
| await queryRunner.query(`ALTER TABLE "organization_project_module_employee" DROP CONSTRAINT "FK_230366f71696f7752afac3f53cd"`); | ||
| await queryRunner.query(`ALTER TABLE "organization_project_module_employee" DROP CONSTRAINT "FK_5c6124c57cf06b62e6c5d4ae2c6"`); | ||
| await queryRunner.query(`ALTER TABLE "organization_project_module_employee" DROP CONSTRAINT "FK_c0f24a425e294a86c977ccafed6"`); | ||
| await queryRunner.query(`ALTER TABLE "organization_project_module_employee" DROP CONSTRAINT "FK_0b50ed382a8698a973b6201895a"`); | ||
| await queryRunner.query(`ALTER TABLE "organization_project_module" ADD "managerId" uuid`); | ||
| await queryRunner.query(`DROP INDEX "public"."IDX_5f4b71530d53181987bea86a93"`); | ||
| await queryRunner.query(`DROP INDEX "public"."IDX_230366f71696f7752afac3f53c"`); | ||
| await queryRunner.query(`DROP INDEX "public"."IDX_5c6124c57cf06b62e6c5d4ae2c"`); | ||
| await queryRunner.query(`DROP INDEX "public"."IDX_fa8fbbaa9d358aff5afb6492d3"`); | ||
| await queryRunner.query(`DROP INDEX "public"."IDX_4ee53d5870dcd9668536d617f0"`); | ||
| await queryRunner.query(`DROP INDEX "public"."IDX_c0f24a425e294a86c977ccafed"`); | ||
| await queryRunner.query(`DROP INDEX "public"."IDX_0b50ed382a8698a973b6201895"`); | ||
| await queryRunner.query(`DROP INDEX "public"."IDX_5851128af6de9c905f0e2be1e6"`); | ||
| await queryRunner.query(`DROP INDEX "public"."IDX_84e91db708746a20040843c887"`); | ||
| await queryRunner.query(`DROP TABLE "organization_project_module_employee"`); | ||
| await queryRunner.query(`CREATE INDEX "IDX_e6b6555e5fc6c5120110a0195c" ON "organization_project_module" ("managerId") `); | ||
| await queryRunner.query(`ALTER TABLE "organization_project_module" ADD CONSTRAINT "FK_e6b6555e5fc6c5120110a0195cd" FOREIGN KEY ("managerId") REFERENCES "user"("id") ON DELETE CASCADE ON UPDATE NO ACTION`); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure foreign key constraints are correctly re-established in down migrations
In the postgresDownQueryRunner method, after dropping the organization_project_module_employee table, make sure that all foreign key constraints and indexes on the organization_project_module table are properly restored. This is crucial to maintain database integrity when rolling back migrations.
PR
Please note: we will close your PR without comment if you do not check the boxes above and provide ALL requested information.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores
These enhancements aim to improve user experience and project management efficiency within the application.