Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Shanghai tracking issue #25820

Closed
MariusVanDerWijden opened this issue Sep 19, 2022 · 5 comments
Closed

Shanghai tracking issue #25820

MariusVanDerWijden opened this issue Sep 19, 2022 · 5 comments

Comments

@MariusVanDerWijden
Copy link
Member

MariusVanDerWijden commented Sep 19, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Shanghai is not fully specified yet, but it is good to track all ongoing efforts for shanghai:

EIP PR Merged
EIP-3540: EVM Object Format (EOF) v1 #22958
EIP-3651: Warm COINBASE #25819
EIP-3670: EOF - Code Validation #24090
EIP-3855: PUSH0 instruction #24039 y
EIP-3860: Limit and meter initcode #23847
EIP-4895: Beacon chain push withdrawals as operations
EIP-4758: Deactivate SELFDESTRUCT #25871 #24389
@ruozia
Copy link

ruozia commented Sep 22, 2022

The first time I knew

@holiman
Copy link
Contributor

holiman commented Sep 26, 2022

https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+eip+label%3A%22maybe+shanghai%22

@gumb0
Copy link
Member

gumb0 commented Sep 28, 2022

https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+eip+label%3A%22maybe+shanghai%22

#23847 is missing the label

@tynes tynes mentioned this issue Oct 17, 2022
Merged
@tynes
Copy link
Contributor

tynes commented Oct 17, 2022

Can we get a maybe-shanghai label on #26003 please?

@s1na
Copy link
Contributor

s1na commented May 24, 2023

Version v.11.5 enabled Shanghai for mainnet nodes. Closing the issue.

@s1na s1na closed this as completed May 24, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
6 participants
@holiman @s1na @gumb0 @tynes @MariusVanDerWijden @ruozia