Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Drop support for Java bindings #706

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 1, 2024
Merged

Drop support for Java bindings #706

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 1, 2024

Conversation

chfast
Copy link
Member

@chfast chfast commented Feb 29, 2024

There are some EVM features not implemented for Java (e.g. transient storage). The bindings probably never worked and there is no interest in using or maintaining these.

There are some EVM features not implemented for Java (e.g. transient
storage). The bindings probably never worked and there is no
interest in using or maintaining these.
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 29, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.49%. Comparing base (b576474) to head (6c3723f).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #706   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.49%   93.49%           
=======================================
  Files          25       25           
  Lines        3857     3857           
  Branches      396      396           
=======================================
  Hits         3606     3606           
  Misses        139      139           
  Partials      112      112           

@chfast chfast merged commit f130132 into master Mar 1, 2024
19 checks passed
@chfast chfast deleted the drop_java branch March 1, 2024 12:31
@atoulme
Copy link
Collaborator

atoulme commented Mar 1, 2024

Approved!

@jrhea
Copy link
Collaborator

jrhea commented Mar 17, 2024

🥲

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants