-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update EIP-4844: Sync MAX_VERSIONED_HASHES_LIST_SIZE
to 2**12
#6503
Conversation
Align `MAX_VERSIONED_HASHES_LIST_SIZE` with `LIMIT_BLOBS_PER_TX` and `MAX_TX_WRAP_KZG_COMMITMENTS` changes from ethereum#6500. ```python assert len(versioned_hashes) == len(commitments) == len(blobs) ```
File
|
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ Compared to full data sharding, this EIP has a reduced cap on the number of thes | |||
| `TARGET_DATA_GAS_PER_BLOCK` | `2**18` | | |||
| `MIN_DATA_GASPRICE` | `1` | | |||
| `DATA_GASPRICE_UPDATE_FRACTION` | `2225652` | | |||
| `MAX_VERSIONED_HASHES_LIST_SIZE` | `2**24` | | |||
| `MAX_VERSIONED_HASHES_LIST_SIZE` | `2**12` | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
| `MAX_VERSIONED_HASHES_LIST_SIZE` | `2**12` | | |
| `MAX_TX_VERSIONED_HASHES_LIST_SIZE` | `2**12` | |
should we also add _TX_
to sort of correspond with other limits?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, I think aligning the values and renaming them should be separate discussions / PRs.
I think an approval is required from one of the authors |
closing this as we are no longer pursuing SSZ in 4844 |
Align
MAX_VERSIONED_HASHES_LIST_SIZE
withLIMIT_BLOBS_PER_TX
andMAX_TX_WRAP_KZG_COMMITMENTS
changes from #6500.