Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix I2s async-tx #1833

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jul 23, 2024
Merged

Fix I2s async-tx #1833

merged 5 commits into from
Jul 23, 2024

Conversation

bjoernQ
Copy link
Contributor

@bjoernQ bjoernQ commented Jul 18, 2024

Thank you for your contribution!

We appreciate the time and effort you've put into this pull request.
To help us review it efficiently, please ensure you've gone through the following checklist:

Submission Checklist 📝

  • I have updated existing examples or added new ones (if applicable).
  • I have used cargo xtask fmt-packages command to ensure that all changed code is formatted correctly.
  • My changes were added to the CHANGELOG.md in the proper section.
  • My changes are in accordance to the esp-rs API guidelines

Extra:

Pull Request Details 📖

Description

Fixes #1832

Testing

Check with cargo xtask run-example examples esp32c6 embassy_i2s_sound

@MabezDev
Copy link
Member

Could we add an async i2s test while we're here?

@bjoernQ bjoernQ force-pushed the fix/i2s-async-tx branch from 0f323c1 to fa84550 Compare July 18, 2024 15:15
@bjoernQ
Copy link
Contributor Author

bjoernQ commented Jul 18, 2024

Could we add an async i2s test while we're here?

Wow that was harder than it should - but it's there now

Copy link
Contributor

@JurajSadel JurajSadel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

@bjoernQ bjoernQ mentioned this pull request Jul 19, 2024
5 tasks
hil-test/tests/i2s_async.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@MabezDev MabezDev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! Thanks for adding the test case ❤️

@MabezDev MabezDev added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 19, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Jul 19, 2024
@MabezDev MabezDev added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 19, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Jul 19, 2024
@bjoernQ bjoernQ added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 22, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Jul 22, 2024
@MabezDev MabezDev added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 23, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Jul 23, 2024
@MabezDev MabezDev added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 23, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Jul 23, 2024
@MabezDev
Copy link
Member

Could you rebase on main to pull in the latest CI changes?

@jessebraham
Copy link
Member

jessebraham commented Jul 23, 2024

Could you rebase on main to pull in the latest CI changes?

The merge queue should squash and rebase this on main already, shouldn't it?

EDIT: Well, easy enough way to find out I guess... 😁

@jessebraham jessebraham added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 23, 2024
Merged via the queue into esp-rs:main with commit d5bff95 Jul 23, 2024
31 checks passed
@bjoernQ bjoernQ deleted the fix/i2s-async-tx branch November 26, 2024 08:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

I2S write broken
4 participants