Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Rule Tuning] Remote Execution via File Shares #4448

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 5, 2025
Merged

[Rule Tuning] Remote Execution via File Shares #4448

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 5, 2025

Conversation

w0rk3r
Copy link
Contributor

@w0rk3r w0rk3r commented Feb 5, 2025

Issues

Resolves #4424

Summary

Excluding noisy patterns

@w0rk3r w0rk3r added Rule: Tuning tweaking or tuning an existing rule OS: Windows windows related rules Domain: Endpoint backport: auto labels Feb 5, 2025
@w0rk3r w0rk3r self-assigned this Feb 5, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 5, 2025

Rule: Tuning - Guidelines

These guidelines serve as a reminder set of considerations when tuning an existing rule.

Documentation and Context

  • Detailed description of the suggested changes.
  • Provide example JSON data or screenshots.
  • Provide evidence of reducing benign events mistakenly identified as threats (False Positives).
  • Provide evidence of enhancing detection of true threats that were previously missed (False Negatives).
  • Provide evidence of optimizing resource consumption and execution time of detection rules (Performance).
  • Provide evidence of specific environment factors influencing customized rule tuning (Contextual Tuning).
  • Provide evidence of improvements made by modifying sensitivity by changing alert triggering thresholds (Threshold Adjustments).
  • Provide evidence of refining rules to better detect deviations from typical behavior (Behavioral Tuning).
  • Provide evidence of improvements of adjusting rules based on time-based patterns (Temporal Tuning).
  • Provide reasoning of adjusting priority or severity levels of alerts (Severity Tuning).
  • Provide evidence of improving quality integrity of our data used by detection rules (Data Quality).
  • Ensure the tuning includes necessary updates to the release documentation and versioning.

Rule Metadata Checks

  • updated_date matches the date of tuning PR merged.
  • min_stack_version should support the widest stack versions.
  • name and description should be descriptive and not include typos.
  • query should be inclusive, not overly exclusive. Review to ensure the original intent of the rule is maintained.

Testing and Validation

  • Validate that the tuned rule's performance is satisfactory and does not negatively impact the stack.
  • Ensure that the tuned rule has a low false positive rate.

@w0rk3r w0rk3r merged commit 3e0ba33 into main Feb 5, 2025
9 checks passed
@w0rk3r w0rk3r deleted the crwd_exe_rt branch February 5, 2025 17:51
r0ot added a commit to VigilantSec/detection-rules that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2025
* [Rule Tuning] Port Scan Rules (elastic#4443)

* [New Hunt] General Kernel Manipulation (elastic#4403)

* [New Hunt] General Kernel Manipulation

* Update index.yml

* [New Hunt] Persistence via PolicyKit (elastic#4406)

* [New Hunt] Persistence via PolicyKit

* ++

* [New Hunt] Persistence via Desktop Bus (D-Bus) (elastic#4407)

* [Rule Tuning] Remote Execution via File Shares (elastic#4448)

* [Rule Tuning] Tighten Up Elastic Defend Indexes - MacOS (elastic#4447)

* tags (#4)

Co-authored-by: peterydzynski <peter.rydzynski1@gmail.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Ruben Groenewoud <78494512+Aegrah@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jonhnathan <26856693+w0rk3r@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: peterydzynski <peter.rydzynski1@gmail.com>
@r0ot r0ot mentioned this pull request Feb 5, 2025
5 tasks
r0ot added a commit to VigilantSec/detection-rules that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2025
* [Rule Tuning] Port Scan Rules (elastic#4443)

* [New Hunt] General Kernel Manipulation (elastic#4403)

* [New Hunt] General Kernel Manipulation

* Update index.yml

* [New Hunt] Persistence via PolicyKit (elastic#4406)

* [New Hunt] Persistence via PolicyKit

* ++

* [New Hunt] Persistence via Desktop Bus (D-Bus) (elastic#4407)

* [Rule Tuning] Remote Execution via File Shares (elastic#4448)

* [Rule Tuning] Tighten Up Elastic Defend Indexes - MacOS (elastic#4447)

* tags (#4)



---------

Co-authored-by: Ruben Groenewoud <78494512+Aegrah@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jonhnathan <26856693+w0rk3r@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: peterydzynski <peter.rydzynski1@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport: auto community Domain: Endpoint OS: Windows windows related rules Rule: Tuning tweaking or tuning an existing rule
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Rule Tuning] Remote Execution via File Shares - False positive for CrowdStrike updates
3 participants