Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(binding-netconf): use ts strict checking #1071

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 6, 2023

Conversation

relu91
Copy link
Member

@relu91 relu91 commented Sep 5, 2023

Another down.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 5, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 43.90% and project coverage change: -0.09% ⚠️

Comparison is base (949a7e1) 75.28% compared to head (d70b130) 75.20%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1071      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   75.28%   75.20%   -0.09%     
==========================================
  Files          80       80              
  Lines       15455    15472      +17     
  Branches     1481     1484       +3     
==========================================
  Hits        11636    11636              
- Misses       3783     3800      +17     
  Partials       36       36              
Files Changed Coverage Δ
...ckages/binding-netconf/src/codecs/netconf-codec.ts 19.68% <0.00%> (ø)
packages/binding-netconf/src/async-node-netconf.ts 54.85% <29.16%> (-4.64%) ⬇️
packages/binding-netconf/src/netconf-client.ts 65.38% <33.33%> (ø)
packages/binding-netconf/src/xpath2json.ts 63.05% <80.00%> (-0.24%) ⬇️
packages/binding-netconf/src/netconf.ts 94.87% <100.00%> (-5.13%) ⬇️

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@relu91 relu91 merged commit ecddb7f into eclipse-thingweb:master Sep 6, 2023
@relu91 relu91 mentioned this pull request Sep 6, 2023
14 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants