Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

hotfixes #157

Closed
wants to merge 946 commits into from
Closed

hotfixes #157

wants to merge 946 commits into from

Conversation

boegel
Copy link
Member

@boegel boegel commented Aug 25, 2012

Fix bugs introduced in #106 and #87.

Toon Willems and others added 30 commits August 10, 2012 14:55
Conflicts:
	easybuild/easyconfigs/b/BLACS/BLACS-1.1-GCC-4.6.3-MVAPICH2-1.7.eb
…naming

rename easyconfig files according to standard
…ify,

remove Python as direct dependency for PETSc
…dependencies Docutils, Jinja2 and setuptools
…, FIAT, Instant, Jinja2, ScientificPython, UFL, Viper
…ed-modules"

This reverts commit 6a50b80, reversing
changes made to da296a2.
…check

Revert "Merge pull request easybuilders#73 from nudded/346-check-loaded-modules"
boegel and others added 27 commits August 22, 2012 16:43
…sions;

both when a group is specified (no access for others), and without (remove write permissions for group/others);
add stub config parameter for specifying that install dir should be made read-only after installation, and make that changes if the EasyBuild config dictates so
Conflicts:
	easybuild/easyblocks/o/openfoam.py
	easybuild/tools/filetools.py
…ce everything is in the easybuild.easyblocks namespace now
 We will just try to import the easyblock when none is defined, if this fails, fall back to application.
 Since we can't know where the easyblock is actually located, it could be anywhere in __path__
 So let python figure this out.
put easyblocks in easybuild.easyblocks namespace
…d into 145_OpenFoam_permissions

Conflicts:
	easybuild/framework/application.py
…icc, EasyBuild was exiting when no easyblock was found instead of falling back to Application class as a default
@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Aug 25, 2012

argh, wrong branch, should be develop

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants