Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert change to IIncrementalAnalyzer interface #12074

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 17, 2016

Conversation

drognanar
Copy link
Contributor

Reverts PR #11275

@drognanar
Copy link
Contributor Author

FYI @dotnet/roslyn-interactive

<Name>Features</Name>
<ReferenceOutputAssembly>false</ReferenceOutputAssembly>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It feels odd that we're reverting this. Was it part of the original change?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks like it was a part of the original commit 1b6a83f although I'm not sure why VS updated this file since I did not modify this file manually

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually, I looked at the rest of this project, and we do this for many of the other references. My guess is we shouldn't have deleted this in the first place. We should just make sure we don't delete it again in features-testimpact.

@KevinH-MS
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM (except src/VisualStudio/CSharp/Test/CSharpVisualStudioTest.csproj change is suspicious)

@KevinH-MS KevinH-MS merged commit cf87973 into dotnet:master Jun 17, 2016
KevinH-MS added a commit to KevinH-MS/roslyn that referenced this pull request Jun 21, 2016
KevinH-MS added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 21, 2016
Revert "Merge pull request #12074 from drognanar/revertreasons"
@drognanar drognanar deleted the revertreasons branch May 17, 2017 07:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants