Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add annotation_type to our database #1165

Open
dondi opened this issue Jan 22, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

Add annotation_type to our database #1165

dondi opened this issue Jan 22, 2025 · 1 comment
Assignees
@ceciliazaragoza @ntran18
Labels
code review database feature request priority 0.5

Comments

@dondi
Copy link
Owner

dondi commented Jan 22, 2025

From #1120, we have identified that we should capture the annotation_type field
@kdahlquist
Copy link
Collaborator

This should be for both PPI and GRN interactions. I can envision a feature where users can select whether they want to look at just manually curated, just high-throughput, or both types of interactions on GRNs and PPIs that are loaded from the database.

@ntran18 ntran18 self-assigned this Feb 9, 2025
ntran18 added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 9, 2025
@ntran18
#1164 #1165 Fixing the schema for gene regulatory network and protein…
8f856be 
… protein interactions to have timestamp and for gene and protein tables and annotation type for physical interactions table
ntran18 added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 10, 2025
@ntran18
#1165 #1165 #1158 Modify the namespace of gene_regulatory_network and…
2abe82e 
… protein_protein_interactions to include _new, and fixing the populate data scripts to add timestamp and source to the gene and protein tables, and adding annotation type for both GRN and PPI network and interactions table
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@ceciliazaragoza ceciliazaragoza

@ntran18 ntran18

Labels
code review database feature request priority 0.5
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@dondi @kdahlquist @ceciliazaragoza @ntran18