Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Attach timestamps to genes #1164

Open
dondi opened this issue Jan 22, 2025 · 2 comments
Open

Attach timestamps to genes #1164

dondi opened this issue Jan 22, 2025 · 2 comments

Comments

@dondi
Copy link
Owner

dondi commented Jan 22, 2025

Emerging from the discussion of #1120, we have resolved that the gene table should itself have a timestamp. Even if a high percentage of genes will be the same from year to year, producing nearly the same records, we also don’t want to include genes that didn’t exist at a particular time with the interactions from that time

@ntran18 ntran18 self-assigned this Feb 9, 2025
ntran18 added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 9, 2025
… protein interactions to have timestamp and for gene and protein tables and annotation type for physical interactions table
@dondi
Copy link
Owner Author

dondi commented Feb 26, 2025

@ceciliazaragoza reported that initial queries that include the timestamp now run without errors, but for ZAP1, which regulates itself, the updated query does not return the expected self-regulation adjacency item

@kdahlquist checked the 2025 data and confirmed that ZAP1 does still regulate itself, so @ceciliazaragoza will investigate the query further. @ntran18 can investigate the latest loaded data to see if the issue resides in the database scripts instead

@ntran18
Copy link
Collaborator

ntran18 commented Feb 26, 2025

The issue with ZAP1 is not from the database queries but from the scripts that getting data from AllianceMine. I checked the script, and we don't get data that have ZAP1 self-regulated. I have to investigate the queries more.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants