Parallel lifecycle script execution proposal #89
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Should I update the schemas in this PR or do that separately? |
chrmarti
approved these changes
Sep 8, 2022
|
@joshaber Either works, thanks! |
joshaber
force-pushed
the
joshaber/parallel-execution-proposal
branch
from
7f29ba0 to
362c8f1
Compare
|
As per our conversation earlier today I'm going to go ahead and land this proposal and then follow up with the implementation and finally the schema/docs updates. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Coming out of discussions on #83.
Propose supporting parallel lifecycle script execution when scripts are provided as objects.