Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

SwipeRefreshLayout position is under stickerheader #83

Closed
mdtuyen opened this issue May 16, 2016 · 1 comment
Closed

SwipeRefreshLayout position is under stickerheader #83

mdtuyen opened this issue May 16, 2016 · 1 comment
Labels
bug resolved

Comments

@mdtuyen
Copy link

mdtuyen commented May 16, 2016

When I enable swipe to refresh SwipeRefreshLayout showed but It is under StickerHeader. It should be front of StickerHeader.
davideas added a commit that referenced this issue May 16, 2016
@davideas
Fix for SwipeRefreshLayout to be displayed on the top of StickyHeader…
83139f6 
…s Layout #83
@mdtuyen mdtuyen closed this as completed May 17, 2016
@davideas davideas mentioned this issue May 29, 2016
Closed
@davideas
Copy link
Owner

davideas commented Jun 4, 2016 •
edited
Loading

This has a drawback on dragging, they are not compatible!!! Dragging down, it starts the refresh...

I added a comment, in the layout, that imported Layout for StickyHeader cannot be inserted in the SwipeToRefresh if ALSO user wants dragging feature.

@davideas davideas mentioned this issue Jun 6, 2016
Closed
davideas added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 6, 2016
@davideas
Added new base interface OnActionStateListener for OnItemMoveListener…
71b2d56 
… and OnItemSwipeListener to overcome the drag issue with the SwipeRefreshLayout, issues #104 and #83.
@davideas davideas mentioned this issue Jul 15, 2016
Closed
@davideas davideas mentioned this issue Nov 29, 2016
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug resolved
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@mdtuyen @davideas