Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make test_reconnect async #6000

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Mar 31, 2022
Merged

Make test_reconnect async #6000

merged 6 commits into from
Mar 31, 2022

Conversation

mrocklin
Copy link
Member

@mrocklin mrocklin commented Mar 25, 2022

This was flakey due to cleaning up resources.

My experience is that making things async helps with this in general.
I don't have strong confidence that this will fix the issue, but I do
have mild confidence, and strong confidence that it won't hurt.

  • Closes #xxxx
  • Tests added / passed
  • Passes pre-commit run --all-files

This was flakey due to cleaning up resources.

My experience is that making things async helps with this in general.
I don't have strong confidence that this will fix the issue, but I do
have mild confidence, and strong confidence that it won't hurt.
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 26, 2022

Unit Test Results

       18 files  +       6         18 suites  +6   9h 45m 12s ⏱️ + 3h 46m 11s
  2 703 tests +     33    2 619 ✔️ +     31       82 💤 ±    0  2 +2 
24 163 runs  +8 239  22 876 ✔️ +7 811  1 285 💤 +426  2 +2 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit aa8c7d9. ± Comparison against base commit 2fbf9eb.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@mrocklin
Copy link
Member Author

Planning to merge when CI finishes

@mrocklin
Copy link
Member Author

Nope, this still fails

@mrocklin
Copy link
Member Author

Merging when CI finishes

@mrocklin mrocklin merged commit bb091d5 into dask:main Mar 31, 2022
@mrocklin mrocklin deleted the test-reconect-async branch March 31, 2022 12:54
mrocklin added a commit to mrocklin/distributed that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2022
This was flakey due to cleaning up resources.

My experience is that making things async helps with this in general.
I don't have strong confidence that this will fix the issue, but I do
have mild confidence, and strong confidence that it won't hurt.
@graingert graingert mentioned this pull request Apr 8, 2022
3 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants