Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 5, 2020. It is now read-only.

azure: put masters and workers into AvailabilitySets and ScaleSets #93

Closed
philips opened this issue Mar 21, 2017 · 5 comments
Closed

azure: put masters and workers into AvailabilitySets and ScaleSets #93

philips opened this issue Mar 21, 2017 · 5 comments

Comments

@philips
Copy link
Contributor

philips commented Mar 21, 2017

ScaleSets currently cannot attach different disks to different virtual machines. This means that Kubernetes persistent volumes will not work with our setup for multi-machine.

To fix this we need to offer the ability to spin-up via AvailabilitySets instead. Should we create a separate module if someone wants to use AvailabilitySets vs ScaleSets similar to how you do with AWS?

cc @alexsomesan

@alexsomesan
Copy link
Contributor

alexsomesan commented Mar 22, 2017 via email

@philips
Copy link
Contributor Author

philips commented Mar 22, 2017

@alexsomesan thank you. Yes, I was unaware as well. Something we just learned about the product.

@alekssaul
Copy link
Contributor

alekssaul commented Apr 3, 2017

Also mentioned in : #168

@s-urbaniak
Copy link
Contributor

upstream limitation of cloud-provider integration: kubernetes/kubernetes#40913

@discordianfish
Copy link
Contributor

So I'm trying this right now, but not sure that the cloud-provider integration even works with availability sets. Let's see.

discordianfish added a commit to discordianfish/tectonic-installer that referenced this issue Jun 9, 2017
Instances in a Scale Set are not supported by the kubernetes
cloud-provider integration.

This closes coreos#93
discordianfish added a commit to discordianfish/tectonic-installer that referenced this issue Jun 9, 2017
Instances in a Scale Set are not supported by the kubernetes
cloud-provider integration.

This closes coreos#93
discordianfish added a commit to discordianfish/tectonic-installer that referenced this issue Jun 9, 2017
Instances in a Scale Set are not supported by the kubernetes
cloud-provider integration.

This closes coreos#93
discordianfish added a commit to discordianfish/tectonic-installer that referenced this issue Jun 9, 2017
Instances in a Scale Set are not supported by the kubernetes
cloud-provider integration.

This closes coreos#93
discordianfish added a commit to discordianfish/tectonic-installer that referenced this issue Jun 9, 2017
Instances in a Scale Set are not supported by the kubernetes
cloud-provider integration.

This closes coreos#93
discordianfish added a commit to discordianfish/tectonic-installer that referenced this issue Jun 9, 2017
Instances in a Scale Set are not supported by the kubernetes
cloud-provider integration.

This closes coreos#93
discordianfish added a commit to discordianfish/tectonic-installer that referenced this issue Jun 9, 2017
Instances in a Scale Set are not supported by the kubernetes
cloud-provider integration.

This closes coreos#93
discordianfish added a commit to discordianfish/tectonic-installer that referenced this issue Jun 9, 2017
Instances in a Scale Set are not supported by the kubernetes
cloud-provider integration.

This closes coreos#93
discordianfish added a commit to discordianfish/tectonic-installer that referenced this issue Jun 9, 2017
Instances in a Scale Set are not supported by the kubernetes
cloud-provider integration.

This closes coreos#93
discordianfish added a commit to discordianfish/tectonic-installer that referenced this issue Jun 9, 2017
Instances in a Scale Set are not supported by the kubernetes
cloud-provider integration.

This closes coreos#93
discordianfish added a commit to discordianfish/tectonic-installer that referenced this issue Jun 9, 2017
Instances in a Scale Set are not supported by the kubernetes
cloud-provider integration.

This closes coreos#93
alexsomesan pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 9, 2017
Instances in a Scale Set are not supported by the kubernetes
cloud-provider integration.

This closes #93
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants