fix: update e2e tests for newer changes in site

[pkspyder007]

✨ Codu Pull Request 💻

Fixes #(issue)
Not an issue-issue just updating the existing e2e for passing the current implementaion

Pull Request details

• Just updated e2e tests and adds a npm script to open playwright ui

Any Breaking changes

• NO

Associated Screenshots

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
codu	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Oct 8, 2024 8:20am

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes involve modifications to two end-to-end test files: e2e/home.spec.ts and e2e/login.spec.ts. In home.spec.ts, a test case that checked the visibility of the "Recommended topics" element based on device type was removed. In login.spec.ts, the button name in two test cases was updated from "Login with GitHub" to "Continue with GitHub," reflecting a semantic change without altering the test structure or functionality.

Changes

File	Change Summary
e2e/home.spec.ts	Removed test case: "Different devices" checking visibility of "Recommended topics" element.
e2e/login.spec.ts	Updated button name from "Login with GitHub" to "Continue with GitHub" in two test cases.

Suggested reviewers

• NiallJoeMaher
• John-Paul-Larkin

🐰 In the meadow where bunnies hop,
Changes made, we won't stop!
"Continue with GitHub," we say,
As we test the night and day.
The topics gone, but fear not,
For our tests are still quite hot! 🐇✨

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[github-actions]

Uh oh! @pkspyder007, the image you shared is missing helpful alt text. Check your pull request body.

Alt text is an invisible description that helps screen readers describe images to blind or low-vision users. If you are using markdown to display images, add your alt text inside the brackets of the markdown image.

Learn more about alt text at Basic writing and formatting syntax: images on GitHub Docs.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)

e2e/login.spec.ts (2)

26-26: LGTM! Consider extracting button name to a constant.

The button name update is consistent with the previous change, which is excellent for maintaining test integrity.

To improve test maintainability, consider extracting the button name to a constant at the top of the file:

import { test, expect } from "playwright/test";

+const GITHUB_BUTTON_NAME = "Continue with GitHub";

// ... rest of the file ...

test("should display the login button", async ({ page }) => {
  const loginButton = page.getByRole("button", {
-    name: "Continue with GitHub",
+    name: GITHUB_BUTTON_NAME,
  });
  expect(loginButton).toBeTruthy();
});

// ... and update the other occurrence similarly ...

This change would make future updates easier and ensure consistency across the test file.

---

Line range hint 1-38: Consider enhancing test coverage and error handling.

The current test suite provides good basic coverage for the login functionality. To further improve the robustness of these tests, consider the following suggestions:

1. Add negative test cases:

   • Test behavior when GitHub authentication fails.
   • Verify error messages for invalid inputs.

2. Improve error handling:

   • Add timeout handling for the waitForURL call.
   • Implement retry logic for potentially flaky network requests.

3. Enhance accessibility testing:

   • Add checks for ARIA attributes on the login button.
   • Verify keyboard navigation for the login process.

4. Consider adding visual regression tests:

   • Capture and compare screenshots of the login page to detect unexpected UI changes.

These enhancements would provide more comprehensive coverage and improve the overall quality of the test suite.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0cadee6 and 8c62d9c.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• package.json is excluded by !**/*.json

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• e2e/home.spec.ts (0 hunks)
• e2e/login.spec.ts (2 hunks)

💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)

• e2e/home.spec.ts

🧰 Additional context used

🔇 Additional comments (1)

e2e/login.spec.ts (1)

17-17: LGTM! Verify UI consistency.

The button name update from "Login with GitHub" to "Continue with GitHub" looks good. This change aligns with modern UX trends, potentially improving user understanding of the action.

To ensure consistency, please verify that this change matches the actual UI update in the application. Run the following command to check for any remaining instances of "Login with GitHub" in the codebase: