Upgrade dependencies and fix prettier (DO NOT MERGE) #1052
Conversation
|
@NiallJoeMaher is attempting to deploy a commit to the Codú Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
|
Important Review skippedReview was skipped due to path filters ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
CodeRabbit blocks several paths by default. You can override this behavior by explicitly including those paths in the path filters. For example, including You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThe pull request updates the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (19)
instrumentation.ts (1)
1-26: Overall, good implementation with room for improvement.The
instrumentation.tsfile successfully sets up Sentry for both Node.js and Edge runtimes in a Next.js application. The implementation is functional, but there are opportunities for improvement:
- Refactor the
registerfunction to reduce code duplication.- Use an environment variable for
tracesSampleRateto make it easily configurable.- Consider using a TypeScript type for the Sentry configuration object to ensure type safety.
These changes will enhance maintainability, flexibility, and type safety of the Sentry initialization code.
sentry.client.config.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-28: Consider environment-specific configurations for sampling rates.While the current configuration is functional, there are a few suggestions to improve it:
The
tracesSampleRateis set to 1 (100%), which might be too high for production. Consider using a lower value or implementing atracesSamplerfunction for more granular control.The
replaysOnErrorSampleRateis set to 1.0 (100%), which might generate a lot of data in production. Consider adjusting this based on your specific needs and error frequency.The
replaysSessionSampleRateis correctly set to 0.1 (10%), but the comment suggests it might be 100% in development. Consider implementing environment-specific configurations to automatically adjust these rates based on the environment.Here's a suggested improvement to make the configuration more environment-aware:
const SENTRY_DSN = process.env.SENTRY_DSN || process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_SENTRY_DSN; const SENTRY_ENVIRONMENT = process.env.SENTRY_ENVIRONMENT; if (SENTRY_DSN && SENTRY_ENVIRONMENT) { const isDevelopment = SENTRY_ENVIRONMENT === 'development'; Sentry.init({ dsn: SENTRY_DSN, environment: SENTRY_ENVIRONMENT, tracesSampleRate: isDevelopment ? 1.0 : 0.1, // 100% in dev, 10% in production replaysOnErrorSampleRate: isDevelopment ? 1.0 : 0.5, // 100% in dev, 50% in production replaysSessionSampleRate: isDevelopment ? 1.0 : 0.1, // 100% in dev, 10% in production integrations: [ Sentry.replayIntegration({ maskAllText: true, blockAllMedia: true, }), ], }); }This configuration automatically adjusts the sampling rates based on the environment, providing more comprehensive data in development while being more conservative in production.
next.config.js (1)
Line range hint
1-56: Overall assessment of next.config.js changesThe changes in this file align with the PR objective of upgrading dependencies, particularly with respect to Sentry integration. The configuration has been consolidated, which improves readability and maintainability.
However, there are a couple of points that require further clarification:
- The purpose and impact of the new experimental feature
instrumentationHook.- The reasoning behind specific Sentry configuration options.
These clarifications will ensure that the changes are well-understood and maintainable in the long term.
Note: No Prettier-related changes were observed in this file, despite being mentioned in the PR objectives. Ensure that Prettier changes are addressed in other files if necessary.
Consider creating a separate configuration file for Sentry options if they become more complex in the future. This would help in managing Sentry-specific settings more effectively.
components/PopularTags/PopularTagsLoading.tsx (2)
Line range hint
16-16: Fix typo in className attributeThe className attribute contains "my-2x", which appears to be a typo. It should likely be "my-2" for consistent vertical margin styling.
Please apply the following change:
- <div className="my-2x flex h-10"> + <div className="my-2 flex h-10">
Line range hint
26-26: Fix another instance of typo in className attributeSimilar to the previous comment, there's another instance of "my-2x" in the className attribute, which should be corrected to "my-2".
Please apply the following change:
- <div className="my-2x flex h-10"> + <div className="my-2 flex h-10">components/ArticlePreview/ArticlePreview.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-226: Consider addressing the following minor issues:
Inconsistent string quotes: The file uses a mix of single and double quotes for strings. Consider using a consistent style throughout the file.
Long lines: Some lines (e.g., the
classNameprop of theBookmarkIcon) are quite long. Consider breaking them into multiple lines for better readability.Unused import: The file imports Sentry but doesn't seem to use it directly in this component. Consider removing unused imports to keep the bundle size minimal.
Would you like me to propose specific changes for any of these issues?
app/(app)/notifications/_client.tsx (3)
Line range hint
149-156: Improved user interaction with clickable avatar.The addition of the Link component around the user's avatar image enhances user experience by providing a clickable link to the user's profile. This change aligns with best practices for improving navigation and interactivity in web applications.
Consider adding an aria-label to the Link for improved accessibility, e.g.:
- <Link className="flex" href={`/${username}`}> + <Link className="flex" href={`/${username}`} aria-label={`${name}'s profile`}>
188-188: Improved button styling with dark mode support.The changes to the button's className enhance its appearance in both light and dark modes, improving overall user experience and accessibility. The hover effect provides good visual feedback to users.
For consistency with the dark mode styling, consider adding a dark mode hover state:
- className="h-8 w-8 fill-neutral-600 hover:fill-neutral-500 dark:text-white" + className="h-8 w-8 fill-neutral-600 hover:fill-neutral-500 dark:text-white dark:hover:text-neutral-300"
Line range hint
1-224: Summary: Minor enhancements improve UX and accessibility.The changes in this file, while minimal, contribute positively to the user experience and accessibility of the Notifications component. The addition of a clickable avatar and improved button styling with dark mode support are in line with modern web development practices.
These modifications align well with the PR objectives of fixing Prettier issues and upgrading dependencies, as they likely resulted from code formatting improvements and potentially leveraging new features or best practices from updated dependencies.
To further improve the component's performance and maintainability, consider:
- Memoizing the
Placeholdercomponent if it's used frequently.- Extracting the notification item rendering logic into a separate component to reduce the complexity of the main
Notificationscomponent.app/(app)/articles/_client.tsx (1)
Line range hint
65-91: Improved onChange handler, but consider URL encoding and default filter handlingThe simplified onChange handler is more concise and easier to read. However, consider the following improvements:
Encode the tag value to handle special characters:
`${tag ? `&tag=${encodeURIComponent(tag)}` : ""}`Omit the filter parameter when it's set to the default value:
router.push( `/articles${e.target.value !== "newest" ? `?filter=${e.target.value}` : ""}${ tag ? `${e.target.value !== "newest" ? "&" : "?"}tag=${encodeURIComponent(tag)}` : "" }` );These changes will make the URL construction more robust and cleaner for the default case.
components/EventForm/EventForm.tsx (2)
218-223: LGTM: Improved image container stylingThe changes to the className attributes enhance the responsiveness and consistency of the image container. The addition of the aspect ratio class is a good practice for maintaining a consistent image shape.
Consider using Tailwind's
aspect-videoclass instead ofaspect-[16/9]for better readability and maintainability, if you're using Tailwind CSS in this project.
259-264: LGTM: Consistent image styling across different statesThese changes maintain consistency with the earlier image-related modifications, improving the styling and responsiveness of the image display in both error/loading states and normal display.
For consistency, consider using the same border width (
border-2) for both the div and img elements, as it's used in the mobile version above.components/ui/Search.tsx (1)
536-536: LGTM: Removed extra space in className.This change improves code cleanliness by removing an unnecessary space in the className string. It's a minor but good adjustment.
Consider running Prettier across the entire codebase to catch and fix similar formatting issues in other components. You can use the following command:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Run Prettier on all TypeScript and TypeScript React files # Expected: Prettier should format all files and report any issues npx prettier --check "**/*.{ts,tsx}"components/Comments/CommentsArea.tsx (6)
Line range hint
89-96: Enhance error handling inlikeCommentfunctionIn the
likeCommentfunction, when an error occurs during the like operation, you display a generic error message to the user. Consider logging the error details to help with debugging and provide more specific feedback. Ensure sensitive information is not exposed to the user.Apply this diff to log the error:
const likeComment = async (commentId: number) => { if (!session) return signIn(); if (likeStatus === "loading") return; try { await like({ commentId }); } catch (err) { + console.error("Error liking comment:", err); toast.error("Something went wrong, try again."); } };
Line range hint
117-169: Aggregate Markdoc validation errors for better user experienceWhen validating Markdoc syntax in the
onSubmitfunction, you loop througherrorsand display each error usingtoast.error(). This may overwhelm users with multiple error toasts if there are several issues. Consider aggregating the errors into a single message or displaying them in a user-friendly format.Apply this diff to aggregate errors:
- errors.forEach((err) => { - toast.error(err.error.message); - }); + const errorMessages = errors.map((err) => err.error.message).join('\n'); + toast.error(errorMessages);
Line range hint
163-172: Improve error handling inonSubmitfunctionIn the
onSubmitfunction's catch blocks, you provide a generic error message to the user. Consider logging the actual error to aid in debugging while ensuring no sensitive information is exposed.Apply this diff to log errors:
} catch (err) { if (err instanceof ZodError) { return toast.error(err.issues[0].message); } + console.error("Error editing comment:", err); toast.error("Something went wrong editing your comment."); }and
} catch (err) { if (err instanceof ZodError) { return toast.error(err.issues[0].message); } + console.error("Error saving comment:", err); toast.error("Something went wrong saving your comment."); }
Line range hint
139-140: Clarify check foreditCommentBoxIdvalidityThe current check
typeof editCommentBoxId !== "number"might not accurately validateeditCommentBoxIdsincenullis of typeobjectin JavaScript. Consider checking fornullorundefineddirectly for better accuracy.Apply this diff to improve the validation:
if (typeof editCommentBoxId !== "number") throw new Error("Invalid edit.");Change to:
if (editCommentBoxId == null) throw new Error("Invalid edit.");
Line range hint
278-287: Make maximum comment depth configurableIn the
generateCommentsfunction, replies are limited to a depth of 6. To enhance flexibility and maintainability, consider defining a constant or making the maximum depth configurable.Apply this diff to define a constant for maximum depth:
+ const MAX_COMMENT_DEPTH = 6; const generateComments = ( commentsArr: Comments | Children | undefined, depth = 0, ) => { if (!commentsArr) return null; return commentsArr.map((...) => { // ... {depth < 6 && ( <buttonChange
depth < 6to:- {depth < 6 && ( + {depth < MAX_COMMENT_DEPTH && (
Line range hint
271-310: Disable form inputs during loading inCommentAreaIn the
CommentAreacomponent, whenloadingistrue, the loading spinner overlays the form, but the input fields remain enabled. This can lead to unintended user interactions. Consider disabling the form fields while loading to prevent this.Apply this diff to disable inputs when loading:
<TextareaAutosize {...register(name)} id={name} minLength={1} className="mb-2 w-full rounded bg-neutral-300 p-2 dark:bg-black" placeholder="What do you think?" minRows={3} + disabled={loading} />
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json,!**/*.jsonpackage.jsonis excluded by!**/*.jsontsconfig.jsonis excluded by!**/*.json
📒 Files selected for processing (43)
- .prettierignore (1 hunks)
- app/(app)/[username]/_usernameClient.tsx (1 hunks)
- app/(app)/alpha/additional-details/_client.tsx (10 hunks)
- app/(app)/alpha/new/[[...postIdArr]]/_client.tsx (3 hunks)
- app/(app)/alpha/settings/_client.tsx (4 hunks)
- app/(app)/alpha/sponsorship/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- app/(app)/articles/_client.tsx (1 hunks)
- app/(app)/code-of-conduct/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- app/(app)/create/[[...paramsArr]]/_client.tsx (5 hunks)
- app/(app)/error.tsx (1 hunks)
- app/(app)/get-started/_client.tsx (2 hunks)
- app/(app)/my-posts/_client.tsx (1 hunks)
- app/(app)/notifications/_client.tsx (2 hunks)
- app/(app)/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- app/(app)/settings/_client.tsx (4 hunks)
- app/(app)/sponsorship/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- components/ArticleMenu/ArticleMenu.tsx (3 hunks)
- components/ArticlePreview/ArticlePreview.tsx (1 hunks)
- components/Comments/CommentsArea.tsx (1 hunks)
- components/CommunityForm/CommunityForm.tsx (4 hunks)
- components/Course/CircularProgressBar.tsx (1 hunks)
- components/EventForm/EventForm.tsx (4 hunks)
- components/Hero/Hero.tsx (1 hunks)
- components/Nav/AnimatedHamburger.tsx (2 hunks)
- components/Nav/MobileNav.tsx (1 hunks)
- components/Nav/Nav.tsx (2 hunks)
- components/PopularTags/PopularTagsLoading.tsx (1 hunks)
- components/PromptService/PromptDialog.tsx (1 hunks)
- components/ReportModal/ReportModal.tsx (1 hunks)
- components/SideBar/SideBarSavedArticlePreview.tsx (1 hunks)
- components/SideBar/SideBarSavedPosts.tsx (1 hunks)
- components/Switch/Switch.tsx (1 hunks)
- components/markdocNodes/Code/Code.tsx (1 hunks)
- components/ui/Search.tsx (3 hunks)
- containers/communities.tsx (1 hunks)
- containers/events.tsx (1 hunks)
- instrumentation.ts (1 hunks)
- next-env.d.ts (1 hunks)
- next.config.js (1 hunks)
- sentry.client.config.ts (1 hunks)
- sentry.edge.config.ts (0 hunks)
- sentry.server.config.ts (0 hunks)
- styles/globals.css (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- sentry.edge.config.ts
- sentry.server.config.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (29)
- .prettierignore
- app/(app)/[username]/_usernameClient.tsx
- app/(app)/alpha/additional-details/_client.tsx
- app/(app)/alpha/new/[[...postIdArr]]/_client.tsx
- app/(app)/alpha/settings/_client.tsx
- app/(app)/alpha/sponsorship/page.tsx
- app/(app)/code-of-conduct/page.tsx
- app/(app)/create/[[...paramsArr]]/_client.tsx
- app/(app)/error.tsx
- app/(app)/my-posts/_client.tsx
- app/(app)/page.tsx
- app/(app)/settings/_client.tsx
- app/(app)/sponsorship/page.tsx
- components/ArticleMenu/ArticleMenu.tsx
- components/CommunityForm/CommunityForm.tsx
- components/Course/CircularProgressBar.tsx
- components/Hero/Hero.tsx
- components/Nav/AnimatedHamburger.tsx
- components/Nav/MobileNav.tsx
- components/Nav/Nav.tsx
- components/PromptService/PromptDialog.tsx
- components/ReportModal/ReportModal.tsx
- components/SideBar/SideBarSavedArticlePreview.tsx
- components/Switch/Switch.tsx
- components/markdocNodes/Code/Code.tsx
- containers/communities.tsx
- containers/events.tsx
- next-env.d.ts
- styles/globals.css
🔇 Additional comments (23)
instrumentation.ts (2)
1-4: LGTM: Imports and constant declarations are well-structured.The import statement and constant declarations are correctly implemented. Good use of environment variables for configuration, and the fallback for SENTRY_DSN is a nice touch for handling different environments.
18-25: Duplicate Sentry initialization for Edge runtime.The Sentry initialization for Edge runtime is identical to the Node.js runtime initialization, including the comment about adjusting
tracesSampleRate.This duplication further supports the refactoring suggestion made earlier. By extracting the common initialization logic, we can ensure consistent configuration across both runtimes and reduce the likelihood of divergence in the future.
sentry.client.config.ts (1)
Line range hint
22-26: Sentry integration method updated correctly.The change from
new Sentry.Replay({...})toSentry.replayIntegration({...})appears to be correct and in line with Sentry's latest integration method for the Replay feature. This update likely reflects changes in Sentry's API as part of the dependency upgrade mentioned in the PR objectives.To ensure this change is consistent with Sentry's current documentation and to check for any additional required changes, please run the following script:
This script will help us ensure that:
- There are no remaining instances of the old integration method.
- Other Sentry-related configurations are consistent with this update.
- Sentry import statements are up-to-date and consistent across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Action Required: Update and Re-run Verification Scripts
Please run the following updated script to verify the Sentry integration and related configurations:
This updated script uses the correct
--type tsflag for TypeScript files. Running these will help ensure that:
- There are no remaining instances of the old
Sentry.Replayintegration method.- Other Sentry-related configurations are consistent with the recent update.
- All Sentry import statements are up-to-date across the codebase.
Sentry Integration Update Verified Successfully
The change from
new Sentry.Replay({...})toSentry.replayIntegration({...})has been correctly implemented. No remaining instances of the old integration method were found, and all Sentry configurations and import statements are consistent and up-to-date.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify Sentry integration method and check for any additional required changes # Test 1: Check if there are any remaining instances of the old integration method echo "Checking for old integration method..." rg --type typescript 'new Sentry\.Replay\(' # Test 2: Verify if there are any other Sentry-related configurations that might need updating echo "Checking for other Sentry configurations..." rg --type typescript 'Sentry\.(init|configureScope|captureException|captureEvent)' # Test 3: Look for any Sentry import statements that might need updating echo "Checking Sentry import statements..." rg --type typescript 'import .* from .*@sentry/'Length of output: 553
Script:
# #!/bin/bash # Description: Verify Sentry integration method and check for any additional required changes # Test 1: Check if there are any remaining instances of the old integration method echo "Checking for old integration method..." rg --type ts 'new Sentry\.Replay\(' # Test 2: Verify if there are any other Sentry-related configurations that might need updating echo "Checking for other Sentry configurations..." rg --type ts 'Sentry\.(init|configureScope|captureException|captureEvent)' # Test 3: Look for any Sentry import statements that might need updating echo "Checking Sentry import statements..." rg --type ts 'import .* from .*@sentry/'Length of output: 2720
next.config.js (2)
51-56: Approve configuration consolidation, but clarify Sentry optionsThe consolidation of the configuration wrapping improves code readability and maintainability. Good job on this refactoring!
However, there are a couple of points that need clarification:
The
silent: trueoption might suppress important logs. Is this intentional? If so, what's the reasoning behind this choice?The
hideSourceMaps: trueoption could potentially affect debugging capabilities. Can you explain why this option is necessary?Consider adding comments to explain these configuration choices, especially if they differ from Sentry's default recommendations.
Let's verify if these Sentry options are consistently applied across the project:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other Sentry configurations in the project rg --type js --type ts "withSentryConfig" -A 10
42-44: Provide context for the new experimental featureThe addition of the
instrumentationHookexperimental feature is noted. However, it's important to understand the reasoning behind this change.
- Could you explain the purpose of enabling this feature?
- Are there any potential impacts or risks associated with it?
- Have you tested the application thoroughly with this feature enabled?
Additionally, consider adding a comment in the code or updating the project documentation to explain why this experimental feature is necessary. This will help future maintainers understand the decision-making process.
To ensure this feature is used correctly, let's check for any usage of this hook in the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Experimental Feature Usage Verified
The
instrumentationHookexperimental feature is only used withinnext.config.js. No other parts of the codebase reference this hook, minimizing potential risks associated with its introduction.Consider documenting the purpose and expected impact of
instrumentationHookwithin the configuration file or the project documentation to aid future maintenance and understanding.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for files that might be using the instrumentationHook rg --type js --type ts "instrumentation" -lLength of output: 450
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for files that might be using the instrumentationHook rg --type js --type ts "instrumentationHook" -lLength of output: 62
components/PopularTags/PopularTagsLoading.tsx (2)
5-5: LGTM: Whitespace removal in classNameThe unnecessary leading whitespace in the className attribute has been removed. This improves code cleanliness without affecting functionality.
Line range hint
1-35: Overall assessment of PopularTagsLoading componentThe changes in this file primarily involve minor adjustments to className attributes. While these don't affect the overall functionality, addressing the typos will ensure consistent styling. The component structure remains sound, providing a good loading skeleton for popular tags.
components/SideBar/SideBarSavedPosts.tsx (2)
79-79: LGTM: Improved code formattingThe removal of the unnecessary newline character after the opening
<div>tag improves code formatting consistency. This change aligns well with the PR objective of fixing Prettier-related issues across the codebase.
Line range hint
1-93: Verify Prettier configuration and consistent formattingWhile this file shows a minor formatting improvement, it's important to ensure that Prettier is correctly configured and similar formatting improvements have been applied consistently across the entire codebase.
To verify the Prettier configuration and formatting consistency, you can run the following script:
This script will help ensure that the Prettier configuration is in place and that formatting is consistent across all relevant files in the project.
components/ArticlePreview/ArticlePreview.tsx (2)
160-161: LGTM: Minor formatting improvementThe removal of the extra space in the
classNameprop of theBookmarkIconcomponent is a good cleanup. It improves code readability without affecting functionality.
Line range hint
1-226: Overall, the ArticlePreview component looks goodThe component is well-structured and implements its functionality effectively. It handles bookmarking, date formatting, and conditional rendering appropriately. The use of headless UI components enhances accessibility.
The changes made in this PR are minimal and don't introduce any issues. The component remains robust and maintainable.
app/(app)/get-started/_client.tsx (3)
51-51: LGTM: Styling improvements for input fieldThe changes to the input field's class attribute appear to be styling improvements. These modifications align with the PR's objective of addressing Prettier-related issues and enhancing the overall appearance of the component.
80-83: LGTM: Improved formatting for "Or" dividerThe changes to the "Or" divider structure and styling are minor improvements that enhance the overall formatting of the component. These modifications are in line with the PR's goal of addressing Prettier-related issues.
Line range hint
1-183: Summary: Changes align with PR objectivesThe modifications in this file are primarily related to styling and formatting improvements. These changes are consistent with the PR's objectives of upgrading dependencies and fixing Prettier issues. The overall functionality and structure of the
GetStartedcomponent remain intact, with no breaking changes introduced.Key points:
- Input field styling has been enhanced.
- The "Or" divider formatting has been improved.
- No functional changes or new dependencies have been added.
These changes contribute to better code consistency and improved visual presentation without altering the component's behavior.
app/(app)/articles/_client.tsx (2)
65-65: LGTM: Improved formattingThe removal of the unnecessary space before the closing tag of the
h1element improves code cleanliness.
Line range hint
1-236: Overall assessment: Minor improvements with no breaking changesThe changes in this file are minimal and focus on improving code clarity and maintainability. The main modifications include:
- Removing an unnecessary space in the h1 element's closing tag.
- Simplifying the onChange handler for the filter select element.
These changes align with the PR objectives of fixing Prettier-related issues and do not introduce any breaking changes. The component's overall functionality remains intact.
To further improve the code, consider implementing the suggested URL encoding and default filter handling in the onChange handler.
components/EventForm/EventForm.tsx (4)
122-122: LGTM: Styling adjustmentThis padding adjustment improves the visual consistency of the form. It aligns with the PR's objective of addressing Prettier-related issues.
228-231: LGTM: Consistent image styling improvementsThese changes to the img element's className are consistent with the earlier modifications to the image container. They enhance the styling and maintain consistency in the image display throughout the form.
274-274: LGTM: Improved label stylingThe adjustment to the text size of the "Change Photo" label enhances its visual appearance and is consistent with the overall styling improvements in this PR.
Line range hint
1-338: Summary: Styling and layout improvementsThe changes in this file primarily focus on enhancing the styling and layout of the EventForm component. These modifications align well with the PR objectives of upgrading dependencies and fixing Prettier issues. The improvements contribute to better consistency and responsiveness of the form, particularly in the image upload section.
Key points:
- Consistent styling for image containers and elements across different states and screen sizes.
- Minor adjustments to padding and text sizes for improved visual appearance.
- No functional changes or breaking changes were introduced.
Overall, these changes improve the user experience without introducing any security issues or major concerns.
components/ui/Search.tsx (2)
Line range hint
1-551: Overall assessment: Minor improvements, no functional changes.The changes in this file are minimal and align with the PR objectives. They improve code quality without affecting functionality. The search component remains intact with its Algolia integration.
To ensure the search functionality still works as expected after these changes, consider adding or updating integration tests for this component.
22-22: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly.The change from a default import to a named import with an alias is a good practice. It potentially allows for more precise imports and better tree-shaking.
To ensure this change aligns with the latest algoliasearch library version, please run the following command:
components/Comments/CommentsArea.tsx (1)
320-324: LGTM!The conditional class assignment correctly updates the icon's fill color based on the
youLikedThisstate, ensuring the UI reflects the user's like status.
| export function register() { | ||
| if (process.env.NEXT_RUNTIME === "nodejs") { | ||
| // this is your Sentry.init call from `sentry.server.config.js|ts` | ||
| Sentry.init({ | ||
| dsn: SENTRY_DSN, | ||
| // Adjust this value in production, or use tracesSampler for greater control | ||
| tracesSampleRate: 1, | ||
| environment: SENTRY_ENVIRONMENT, | ||
| }); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // This is your Sentry.init call from `sentry.edge.config.js|ts` | ||
| if (process.env.NEXT_RUNTIME === "edge") { | ||
| Sentry.init({ | ||
| dsn: SENTRY_DSN, | ||
| // Adjust this value in production, or use tracesSampler for greater control | ||
| tracesSampleRate: 1, | ||
| environment: SENTRY_ENVIRONMENT, | ||
| }); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider refactoring to reduce code duplication.
The register function correctly handles different runtimes, but there's duplication in the Sentry initialization code. Consider extracting the common initialization logic into a separate function to improve maintainability.
Here's a suggested refactor:
function initSentry() {
Sentry.init({
dsn: SENTRY_DSN,
tracesSampleRate: 1,
environment: SENTRY_ENVIRONMENT,
});
}
export function register() {
if (process.env.NEXT_RUNTIME === "nodejs" || process.env.NEXT_RUNTIME === "edge") {
initSentry();
}
}This refactor reduces duplication and makes it easier to maintain the Sentry configuration in one place.
| if (process.env.NEXT_RUNTIME === "nodejs") { | ||
| // this is your Sentry.init call from `sentry.server.config.js|ts` | ||
| Sentry.init({ | ||
| dsn: SENTRY_DSN, | ||
| // Adjust this value in production, or use tracesSampler for greater control | ||
| tracesSampleRate: 1, | ||
| environment: SENTRY_ENVIRONMENT, | ||
| }); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using an environment variable for tracesSampleRate.
The Sentry initialization for Node.js runtime is correct. However, the tracesSampleRate is set to 1, which might not be suitable for production as mentioned in the comment.
Consider using an environment variable for tracesSampleRate to make it configurable across different environments:
const SENTRY_TRACES_SAMPLE_RATE = parseFloat(process.env.SENTRY_TRACES_SAMPLE_RATE || '1');
// In the Sentry.init call:
tracesSampleRate: SENTRY_TRACES_SAMPLE_RATE,This allows you to easily adjust the sample rate for different environments without changing the code.
NiallJoeMaher
changed the title
✨ Codu Pull Request 💻
Pull Request details
Any Breaking changes