Scope global input styles #1042
Conversation
|
@NiallJoeMaher is attempting to deploy a commit to the Codú Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
WalkthroughThe changes involve modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
styles/globals.css (1)
22-35: LGTM! Scoped input styles as intended.The introduction of the
.old-inputclass prefix effectively scopes the global input styles, aligning with the PR objectives. This change should prevent interference with new components while maintaining backwards compatibility for existing ones.A minor suggestion for improvement:
Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of the
.old-inputclass and the exclusion of#article-titleand#article-content. This will help other developers understand the reasoning behind these changes in the future./* .old-input class scopes styles for legacy components, excluding new article editor elements */app/(app)/settings/_client.tsx (1)
131-131: Approved: Addition ofold-inputclass aligns with PR objectivesThe addition of the
old-inputclass to the main container<div>aligns with the PR objective of scoping global input styles. This change should help prevent interference with new components by applying legacy styles to inputs within this component.Consider applying the
old-inputclass directly to individual input elements instead of the container<div>. This would provide more granular control over which inputs receive the legacy styles. For example:-<div className="old-input py-8"> +<div className="py-8"> {/* ... */} - <input type="text" {...register("name")} id="name" autoComplete="given-name" /> + <input type="text" {...register("name")} id="name" autoComplete="given-name" className="old-input" /> {/* Apply similar changes to other input elements */}This approach would make it easier to transition individual inputs to new styles in the future if needed.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- app/(app)/create/[[...paramsArr]]/_client.tsx (4 hunks)
- app/(app)/settings/_client.tsx (2 hunks)
- styles/globals.css (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- app/(app)/create/[[...paramsArr]]/_client.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (3)
styles/globals.css (2)
39-44: Consistent scoping for anchor and label styles.The scoping of anchor and label styles under the
.old-inputclass is consistent with the approach used for input elements. This change further supports the PR objective of preventing interference with new components.
Line range hint
1-524: Summary: Effective scoping of global input stylesThe changes in this file successfully scope the global input styles as intended, addressing the PR objectives. The introduction of the
.old-inputclass prefix allows for a gradual migration to new styles while maintaining backwards compatibility. This approach should effectively prevent interference with new components in the settings page and editor.Key points:
- Input styles are now scoped and more targeted.
- Specific exclusions for
#article-titleand#article-contentsuggest custom styling for these elements.- Anchor and label styles are consistently scoped.
- No breaking changes were introduced, aligning with the PR description.
To ensure that these changes don't unintentionally affect other parts of the application, it would be beneficial to verify the usage of these styles. Run the following script to check for any potential conflicts:
This script will help identify any potential conflicts or inconsistencies in the usage of the new
.old-inputclass and the excluded elements.app/(app)/settings/_client.tsx (1)
105-105: Verify the impact of removing theconfigparameter fromgetUploadUrlThe
configparameter containing{ kind: "uploads", userId: "me" }has been removed from thegetUploadUrlmutation call. This change might affect how the upload URL is generated on the server-side.Please confirm if this change is intentional and doesn't break the upload functionality. You may need to check the server-side implementation of
getUploadUrlto ensure it can handle the absence of these parameters.To verify the impact, you can run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Removal of
configparameter fromgetUploadUrlis consistent across the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other occurrences of getUploadUrl to see if this change is consistent rg "getUploadUrl" --type typescript # Check the server-side implementation of getUploadUrl rg "getUploadUrl.*=.*" --type typescriptLength of output: 148
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other occurrences of getUploadUrl to see if this change is consistent rg "getUploadUrl" --type ts # Check the server-side implementation of getUploadUrl rg "getUploadUrl.*=.*" --type tsLength of output: 1710
✨ Codu Pull Request 💻
Pull Request details
Any Breaking changes