Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

adding David Lange's comments built on rebase of ValidationDoubleCountin... #8850

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

adding David Lange's comments built on rebase of ValidationDoubleCountin... #8850

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

inugent
Copy link
Contributor

@inugent inugent commented Apr 23, 2015

...gFix fixing missing files
Replaces pull 8676

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @inugent for CMSSW_7_5_X.

adding David Lange's comments built on rebase of ValidationDoubleCountin...

It involves the following packages:

Validation/EventGenerator

@vciulli, @covarell, @deguio, @danduggan, @thuer, @cmsbuild, @nclopezo, @bendavid can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@nclopezo you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@inugent
Copy link
Contributor Author

inugent commented Apr 23, 2015

Note: missing files refers to files missing by git add when setting up this branch (they were in the original pull request 8676).

@deguio
Copy link
Contributor

deguio commented Apr 23, 2015

in general there is no need to open a new PR. pushing to the same branch updates the existing one.

DQMHelper dqm(&i); i.setCurrentFolder("Generator/BPhysics");
Nobj = dqm.book1dHisto("N"+name, "N"+name, 1, 0., 1,"bin","Number of "+name);
particle.Configure(i);
for(unsigned int j=0;j<daughters.size();j++){std::cout << j << std::endl; daughters[j].Configure(i);}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please remove the cout

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #8850 was updated. @vciulli, @covarell, @deguio, @danduggan, @thuer, @cmsbuild, @nclopezo, @bendavid can you please check and sign again.

@deguio
Copy link
Contributor

deguio commented Apr 23, 2015

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8850/3400/summary.html

The workflows 140.53 have different files in step1_dasquery.log than the ones found in the baseline. You may want to check and retrigger the tests if necessary. You can check it in the "files" directory in the results of the comparisons

@bendavid
Copy link
Contributor

-1
This can be closed in favour of the 76x version
#9765

@inugent
Copy link
Contributor Author

inugent commented Jun 25, 2015

replaced by #9765

@inugent inugent closed this Jun 25, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants