Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add PbPbHighPtJets skim for 2024 PbPb #46499

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 31, 2024

Conversation

cfmcginn
Copy link
Contributor

@cfmcginn cfmcginn commented Oct 23, 2024

PR description:

This PR adds a new skim for high-pT jets (pT > 300, |eta| < 2.4) saving RAW-RECO in PbPb. Should correspond to no greater than 100k events (estimate from 2018 data puts it at ~20k). To be applied to the hadronic physics PDs (i.e. not HIForward/UPCs).

@mandrenguyen

PR validation:

Tested in CMSSW_14_2_X_2024-10-20-0000, compiles and appears to run when tested w/ runTheMatrix.py -l 142.0 -n -e, modifying step 3 to include the newly defined PbPbHighPtJets skim as:

-s RAW2DIGI,L1Reco,RECO,SKIM:PbPbHighPtJets,PAT

The output appears correctly sensitive to specified trigger path and threshold cuts.

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

To be backported to 14_1_X. EDIT: Backport is now up here #46514

Updated for eta cut, switched selector

Updates to simplify the output content commands
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 23, 2024

cms-bot internal usage

@mandrenguyen
Copy link
Contributor

youyingli This is the last PR needed for PbPb data taking this year (well, it's backport). As you suggested let's follow up with @cms-sw/pdmv-l2 how to do test these.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-46499/42350

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @cfmcginn for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • Configuration/Skimming (pdmv)

@AdrianoDee, @cmsbuild, @kskovpen, @miquork, @sunilUIET can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald, @fabiocos, @missirol, @youyingli this is something you requested to watch as well.
@antoniovilela, @mandrenguyen, @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@mandrenguyen
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Size: This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a3655e/42382/summary.html
COMMIT: 3258df0
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_2_X_2024-10-24-1100/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/46499/42382/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially added 4 lines to the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 11 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 46
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3566343
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 425
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3565898
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 20
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 45 files compared)
  • Checked 201 log files, 171 edm output root files, 46 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@mandrenguyen
Copy link
Contributor

cfmcginn please proceed with a 14_1_X backport

@stahlleiton
Copy link
Contributor

Should this skim be also included in the autoSkim file?

@youyingli
Copy link
Contributor

Should this skim be also included in the autoSkim file?

Yes, it should be added. However, #46447 also modified this line which could conflict.

@cfmcginn
Copy link
Contributor Author

I will setup the backport. For the autoSkim line, perhaps it makes sense for me to update after #46447 is merged?

@mandrenguyen
Copy link
Contributor

I will setup the backport. For the autoSkim line, perhaps it makes sense for me to update after #46447 is merged?

I think it's best to just update everything now, and we handle the merge conflicts as they arise.

@cfmcginn
Copy link
Contributor Author

I will setup the backport. For the autoSkim line, perhaps it makes sense for me to update after #46447 is merged?

I think it's best to just update everything now, and we handle the merge conflicts as they arise.

Understood, will do

@mandrenguyen
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

@cfmcginn , this PR now has conflicts, can you please resolve it?

@cfmcginn
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cfmcginn , this PR now has conflicts, can you please resolve it?

I believe the conflict is resolved

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-46499/42443

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #46499 was updated. @cmsbuild can you please check and sign again.

@mandrenguyen
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Failed Tests: RelVals-INPUT
Size: This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a3655e/42490/summary.html
COMMIT: b880056
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_2_X_2024-10-30-1100/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/46499/42490/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a3655e/42490/git-recent-commits.json
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a3655e/42490/git-merge-result

  • DAS Queries: The DAS query tests failed, see the summary page for details.

RelVals-INPUT

  • 2024.0000012024.000001_RunJetMET02024D_10k/step1_dasquery.log
  • 2024.0010012024.001001_RunZeroBias2024D_10k/step1_dasquery.log
  • 2024.1000012024.100001_RunJetMET02024C_10k/step1_dasquery.log
Expand to see more relval errors ...
  • 2024.101001
  • 2024.000001
  • 2024.001001
  • 2024.100001
  • 2024.101001

Comparison Summary

Summary:

@AdrianoDee
Copy link
Contributor

+pdmv
Failures relates to #46555

@AdrianoDee
Copy link
Contributor

please test with #46559

@mandrenguyen
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@mandrenguyen
Copy link
Contributor

merge
Tests are passed, just comparisons are just slow

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 77e87d3 into cms-sw:master Oct 31, 2024
10 of 11 checks passed
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Size: This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a3655e/42494/summary.html
COMMIT: b880056
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_2_X_2024-10-30-2300/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/46499/42494/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a3655e/42494/git-recent-commits.json
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a3655e/42494/git-merge-result

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially added 1 lines to the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 6 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 46
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3569372
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 374
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3568978
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 20
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 45 files compared)
  • Checked 201 log files, 171 edm output root files, 46 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants