Add D110 Default Input Dataset

[AdrianoDee]

This PR proposes the addition of a default dataset for D110 geometry. To be used, also, for the standard MinBias input and the inputs for the bot tests (to be introduced after this PR).

[cmsbuild]

cms-bot internal usage

[AdrianoDee]

test parameters:

• workflows=29634.0,29834.0,29834.402

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-44965/40238

• This PR adds an extra 60KB to repository

• There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:

  • File Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/relval_steps.py modified in PR(s): Fix relval embedding workflows #44928, change input siPixelClusters collection for 1040.0 wf step2 #44932, Introducing DIGInoHLT + HLTOnly Steps #44964

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @AdrianoDee for master.

It involves the following packages:

• Configuration/PyReleaseValidation (upgrade, pdmv)

@cmsbuild, @sunilUIET, @AdrianoDee, @miquork, @srimanob, @subirsarkar can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald, @makortel, @slomeo, @missirol, @fabiocos this is something you requested to watch as well.
@sextonkennedy, @rappoccio, @antoniovilela you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[AdrianoDee]

please test

[cmsbuild]

-1

Failed Tests: RelVals
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-4d8522/39363/summary.html
COMMIT: 13e3b39
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_1_X_2024-05-13-1100/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/44965/39363/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

RelVals

ValueError: Undefined workflows: 29834.402, 29834.0

[AdrianoDee]

test parameters:

• workflows=29634.0,29834.0,29834.402
• workflow_opts = -w upgrade

[AdrianoDee]

please test

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-44965/40247

• This PR adds an extra 60KB to repository

• There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:

  • File Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/relval_steps.py modified in PR(s): Fix relval embedding workflows #44928, Introducing DIGInoHLT + HLTOnly Steps #44964

[AdrianoDee]

The failure is related specifically to *.402 with D110 so technically not related to this PR for the inputs. I would decouple the two and investigate it in another context.

[AdrianoDee]

unhold

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-4d8522/39541/summary.html
COMMIT: 684c390
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_1_X_2024-05-27-1100/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/44965/39541/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

• DAS Queries: The DAS query tests failed, see the summary page for details.

Comparison Summary

There are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline:
29834.0 step 2
The results for the comparisons for these workflows could be incomplete
This means most likely that the IB is having errors in the relvals.The error does NOT come from this pull request

Summary:

• You potentially added 41 lines to the logs
• Reco comparison results: 10 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3436810
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 6
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3436784
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 20
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 48 files compared)
• Checked 209 log files, 170 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[AdrianoDee]

+pdmv
(workflows with D110 inputs successful)

[srimanob]

+Upgrade

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy, @antoniovilela (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[rappoccio]

+1