TeV jet RAW-RECO skim

[lathomas]

PR description:

This PR introduces a new skim selecting events based on the presence of a TeV AK4 PF jet. The main purpose is to be able to quickly react to any anomaly observed with TeV jets (recent example: prefiring, but the scope is larger)
The skim passing rate is found to be 0.1%, i.e an order of magnitude lower than the existing EXOHighMET skim
The proposal is presented in these slides shown at a PPD meeting.

PR validation:

The following command runs locally

 cmsDriver.py SKIM --filein /store/data/Run2023D/JetMET1/RAW/v1/000/370/340/00000/e82d9e40-ebb8-4311-a083-0a248a220d87.root --fileout file:SKIM_TeVJet.root --nThreads 8 --no_exec --number 100 --python_filename SKIM_TeVJet.py --scenario pp --step RAW2DIGI,L1Reco,RECO,SKIM:TeVJet --data --conditions auto:run3_data_prompt --era Run3

However, given the low passing rate of the skim, no event is passing. Running on crab on /JetMET0/Run2023C-v1/RAW works and give passing events with the passing rate quoted above.
The output dataset can be found here

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

Not a backport

[cmsbuild]

cms-bot internal usage

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-43581/38228

• This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @lathomas for master.

It involves the following packages:

• DPGAnalysis/Skims (pdmv)

@AdrianoDee, @miquork, @cmsbuild, @sunilUIET can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@youyingli, @AnnikaStein this is something you requested to watch as well.
@rappoccio, @sextonkennedy, @antoniovilela you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy, @antoniovilela (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[miquork]

please test

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-b6be99/36522/summary.html
COMMIT: 7dac0f2
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_0_X_2023-12-15-1100/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/43581/36522/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• You potentially removed 89 lines from the logs
• Reco comparison results: 1 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 50
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3429858
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3429836
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 49 files compared)
• Checked 214 log files, 167 edm output root files, 50 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[youyingli]

Hi @lathomas , just make sure if the skim follows the below PDs:

• 2022 : JetHT, MET, JetMET
• 2023 : JetMET

[lathomas]

Hi @youyingli somehow I missed your post. Yes, the list of datasets is correct (in 2023, JetMET is splitted in JetMET0 and JetMET1 though).

[youyingli]

Hi @AdrianoDee, could you sign this PR?

[youyingli]

Hi @AdrianoDee, could you sign this PR?

@AdrianoDee , please sign this PR

[sunilUIET]

+pdmv

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @rappoccio, @antoniovilela (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[rappoccio]

+1