-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Print the labels of ConditionalTask modules that are not consumed in any of the associated Paths #43296
Print the labels of ConditionalTask modules that are not consumed in any of the associated Paths #43296
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-43296/37720
|
A new Pull Request was created by @makortel (Matti Kortelainen) for master. It involves the following packages:
@Dr15Jones, @cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @makortel can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild, please test |
@Dr15Jones Could you review? |
FYI @rovere |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-7f44fa/35864/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
e5c6296
to
d8111aa
Compare
Addressed Chris' comments |
…any of the associated Paths The original goal was to delete such modules from the job (similarly to non-consumed unscheduled modules), but that turned out to be complicated (as there could be modules that should be treated like this that _are_ consumed by some other module). Printing out the labels should suffice the remaining HLT needs for ConditionalTask.
d8111aa
to
725f03d
Compare
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-43296/37787
|
Pull request #43296 was updated. @cmsbuild, @makortel, @smuzaffar, @Dr15Jones can you please check and sign again. |
@cmsbuild, please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-7f44fa/35966/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+core |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @antoniovilela, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
The original goal was to delete such modules from the job (similarly to non-consumed unscheduled modules), but that turned out to be complicated (as there could be modules that should be treated like this that are consumed by some other module). Printing out the labels should suffice the remaining HLT needs for ConditionalTask.
Resolves cms-sw/framework-team#712
PR validation:
Framework unit tests run.