-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Run3 promptData JetID #43195
Add Run3 promptData JetID #43195
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-43195/37514
|
A new Pull Request was created by @etzia (Eirini Tziaferi) for master. It involves the following packages:
@jfernan2, @mandrenguyen, @vlimant, @cmsbuild, @simonepigazzini can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
Milestone for this pull request has been moved to CMSSW_14_0_X.Please open a backport if it should also go in to CMSSW_13_3_X. |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-58eb2b/35644/summary.html Found compilation warnings Comparison SummarySummary:
|
@etzia there are compilation warnings https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-58eb2b/35644/summary.html |
enable nano |
please test |
please test |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals RelVals-INPUT RelVals-NANO RelVals
Expand to see more relval errors ...RelVals-INPUT
Expand to see more relval errors ...
RelVals-NANO |
failures independent of the PR. something else is broken apparently |
please test |
The failure was due to this: cms-data/RecoEgamma-ElectronIdentification#28 (comment) |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-58eb2b/36878/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
NANO Comparison SummarySummary:
Nano size comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @rappoccio, @antoniovilela (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
@laurenhay @rkogler
The JetID criteria for the prompt reco 2022 and 2023 data have been implemented.
The criteria can be found in
https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMS/JetID13p6TeV
PR validation:
I have run successfully the following checks:
scram b code-checks
scram b code-format