Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[13_0_X] Addition of 2023 WFs and Fixing NANO step #42089

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jul 4, 2023

Conversation

sunilUIET
Copy link
Contributor

@sunilUIET sunilUIET commented Jun 26, 2023

Add 2023 WFs and fix the reco step to store Nano output.
This is a partial backport of #42069 and #42047

There is a change in the HLT step as well to have the correct era/conditions for 2022 WFs starting from 139.001

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 26, 2023

A new Pull Request was created by @sunilUIET (sunil bansal) for CMSSW_13_0_X.

It involves the following packages:

  • Configuration/PyReleaseValidation (pdmv, upgrade)

@cmsbuild, @bbilin, @srimanob, @sunilUIET, @AdrianoDee can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @kpedro88, @Martin-Grunewald, @missirol, @fabiocos, @slomeo this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@sunilUIET
Copy link
Contributor Author

est parameters:

relvals_opt= -w standard
workflows = 141.001,141.002,141.003,141.004,141.005,141.006,141.007,141.008,141.009,141.010,141.011,141.012,141.013,141.031,141.032,141.033,141.034,141.035,141.036,141.037,141.038

@sunilUIET
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-aa5c1d/33387/summary.html
COMMIT: 744e2cb
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_0_X_2023-06-26-1100/el8_amd64_gcc11
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/42089/33387/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially removed 15 lines from the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3317136
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 3
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3317111
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 48 files compared)
  • Checked 213 log files, 164 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #42089 was updated. @cmsbuild, @bbilin, @srimanob, @sunilUIET, @AdrianoDee can you please check and sign again.

1 similar comment
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #42089 was updated. @cmsbuild, @bbilin, @srimanob, @sunilUIET, @AdrianoDee can you please check and sign again.

@sunilUIET
Copy link
Contributor Author

test parameters:

relvals_opt= -w standard
workflows = 141.001,141.002,141.003,141.004,141.005,141.006,141.007,141.008,141.009,141.010,141.011,141.012,141.013,141.031,141.032,141.033,141.034,141.035,141.036,141.037,141.038

@sunilUIET
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-aa5c1d/33398/summary.html
COMMIT: 781fa71
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_0_X_2023-06-26-1100/el8_amd64_gcc11
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/42089/33398/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-aa5c1d/33398/git-recent-commits.json
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-aa5c1d/33398/git-merge-result

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially removed 259 lines from the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 1428 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3317136
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 2558
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3314556
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 48 files compared)
  • Checked 213 log files, 164 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: found differences in 1 / 47 workflows

@sunilUIET
Copy link
Contributor Author

+pdmv

@sunilUIET
Copy link
Contributor Author

@srimanob do see the issue now.

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

@sunilUIET when you are ready with this backport please don't forget to prepare also the PR to backport in 13_1_X

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

@srimanob do see the issue now.

Is this PR ready to go, or you need to fix?

@sunilUIET
Copy link
Contributor Author

@srimanob I fixed it. I was wondering if you still see the issue you mentioned earlier. Sorry I could not check it from the logs

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

I think if you summarize on 139.001 then we should be good to go. @sunilUIET

@sunilUIET
Copy link
Contributor Author

+pdmv

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

srimanob commented Jul 3, 2023

Sorry @sunilUIET
Do you get a clear answer on 139.001? If yes, could you please update the PR description, then this PR is good to go. Thanks.

@sunilUIET
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sorry @sunilUIET Do you get a clear answer on 139.001? If yes, could you please update the PR description, then this PR is good to go. Thanks.

@srimanob it is done

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Jul 4, 2023

backport of #42069
(partial backport; it also includes previous #41629 and the bug fixes in #42047)

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

srimanob commented Jul 4, 2023

+Upgrade

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 4, 2023

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_13_0_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_13_2_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Jul 4, 2023

@sunilUIET this still misses the backport to 13_1_X: let wait for it being at least submitted before merging this PR in the older 13_0_X cycle

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Jul 4, 2023

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit d94217b into cms-sw:CMSSW_13_0_X Jul 4, 2023
@sunilUIET
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @perrotta I am not fully available this week. I will work on the backport next week.

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Jul 5, 2023

@sunilUIET all newly added worklows are failing in the CMSSW_13_0_X_2023-07-04-2300 IB
I am going to revert this PR in 13_0_X so that we can build 13_0_10, see #42187

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

srimanob commented Jul 5, 2023

There was a typo MINIAOOD, which should be MINIAOD.
I clone this PR and fix the typo in #42191

steps['RECONANORUN3_reHLT']=merge([{'-s':'RAW2DIGI,L1Reco,RECO,PAT,NANO,DQM:@standardDQM+@miniAODDQM+@nanoAODDQM'},steps['RECODR3_reHLT']])
steps['RECONANORUN3_ZB_reHLT']=merge([{'-s':'RAW2DIGI,L1Reco,RECO,PAT,NANO,DQM:@rerecoZeroBias+@miniAODDQM+@nanoAODDQM'},steps['RECODR3_reHLT']])
steps['RECOCOSMRUN3_reHLT']=merge([{'--scenario':'cosmics','-s':'RAW2DIGI,L1Reco,RECO,DQM','--datatier':'RECO,DQMIO','--eventcontent':'RECO,DQM'},steps['RECONANORUN3_reHLT']])
steps['RECONANORUN3_reHLT']=merge([{'-s':'RAW2DIGI,L1Reco,RECO,PAT,NANO,DQM:@standardDQMFakeHLT+@miniAODDQM+@nanoAODDQM','--datatier':'RECO,MINIAOD,NANOAOD,DQMIO','--eventcontent':'RECO,MINIAOOD,NANOEDMAOD,DQM'},steps['RECODR3_reHLT']])
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Typo here MINIAOOD

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants