Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Run3-hcx335 Add protection to eta values for phase2 scenario in HCAL geometry #39920

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 31, 2022

Conversation

bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor

@bsunanda bsunanda commented Oct 29, 2022

PR description:

Add protection to eta values for phase2 scenario in HCAL geometry. Protect against use of the wrong PU file in phase2 scenario. This is a bug fix and a protection for wrong usage

PR validation:

Use the runTheMatrix test workflows

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

This needs to be back ported to 12_5_X and 12_4_X

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39920/32835

  • This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39920/32836

  • This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda (Sunanda Banerjee) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • CondFormats/GeometryObjects (db, alca)
  • Geometry/HcalCommonData (geometry)

@malbouis, @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @makortel, @saumyaphor4252, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @bsunanda, @yuanchao, @ggovi, @tvami, @ChrisMisan, @francescobrivio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@tocheng, @mmusich, @fabiocos, @seemasharmafnal this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild Please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39920/32841

  • This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tvami @ChrisMisan @srimanob I just squashed the commits. No other changes made. Can you sign this urgently?

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

+geometry

bsunanda pushed a commit to bsunanda/cmssw that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2022
…ens for wrong mixing of signal and PU SIM results

Some fix
@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Oct 31, 2022

+1

  • just squashed commits since last signature

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39920/32862

  • This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #39920 was updated. can you please check and sign again.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-df6969/28669/summary.html
COMMIT: 6fc8f83
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_6_X_2022-10-31-1100/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/39920/28669/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 12 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3416356
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 9
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3416325
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 47 files compared)
  • Checked 206 log files, 48 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@rappoccio
Copy link
Contributor

+1

  • Straightforward protection, comparisons look good.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants