Migrate Validation/Geometry to D92

[srimanob]

PR description:

This PR provided fix of unit test after #38702 was merged. Discussion is in #38594 (comment)

PR validation:

None. To be tested with #39571 and #39572

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

Not a backport and no need of backport.

[srimanob]

Full test is done in #39571 (comment)

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39590/32389

• This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @srimanob (Phat Srimanobhas) for master.

It involves the following packages:

• Validation/Geometry (geometry, dqm)

@civanch, @Dr15Jones, @makortel, @emanueleusai, @ianna, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @bsunanda, @jfernan2, @mdhildreth, @syuvivida, @pmandrik, @micsucmed, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@youyingli, @vargasa, @rovere, @fabiocos, @apsallid, @lecriste, @missirol, @rishabhCMS, @ebrondol, @rbartek this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[srimanob]

@cmsbuild please test

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-dc3c29/27976/summary.html
COMMIT: 969b56e
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_6_X_2022-10-03-2300/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/39590/27976/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

• /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-dc3c29/41834.0_TTbar_14TeV+2026D94+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSimHLBeamSpot14+DigiTrigger+RecoGlobal+HARVESTGlobal

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 9 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3432650
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 9
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3432619
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 48 files compared)
• Checked 204 log files, 49 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[perrotta]

@cms-sw/geometry-l2 @cms-sw/dqm-l2 with this (simple) fix the unit test materialBudgetHGCalPlot now succeed, instead of failing as in the IBs. Would you agree signing, so that this fix can be included already in pre3?

[civanch]

+1

fixes are obvious

[perrotta]

+1

• I agree with @civanch that these fixes are obvious: let me superseed the @cms-sw/dqm-l2 signature here, then, so that we can try to recover a few red buttons in the IB test pages

[perrotta]

merge

[emanueleusai]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will be automatically merged.