Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add tracking efficiencies w.r.t. offline to HLT monitoring client #38959

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 10, 2022

Conversation

kjpena
Copy link
Contributor

@kjpena kjpena commented Aug 3, 2022

PR description:

This PR adds the sequence producing HLT tracking efficiencies and fake rates w.r.t. offline tracks to the HLT monitoring client

PR validation:

Efficiency and fake rate plots are now produced when running the harvesting step with @HLTMon

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

A backport to 12_4_X will be needed

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 3, 2022

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-38959/31405

  • This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 3, 2022

A new Pull Request was created by @kjpena for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • DQMOffline/Configuration (dqm)

@emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @pmandrik, @micsucmed, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@threus, @rociovilar this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@
DQMMessageLoggerClientSeq )


HLTMonitoringClient = cms.Sequence(trackingMonitorClientHLT * trackingForDisplacedJetMonitorClientHLT)
HLTMonitoringClient = cms.Sequence(trackingMonitorClientHLT * trackEfficiencyMonitoringClientHLT * trackingForDisplacedJetMonitorClientHLT)
HLTMonitoringClientPA= cms.Sequence(trackingMonitorClientHLT * PAtrackingMonitorClientHLT)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would it make sense to update HLTMonitoringClientPA in the same way?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It could be useful but, since that's the client used in the Heavy-Ions scenario, I would let @FHead comment

Copy link
Contributor

@missirol missirol Aug 3, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@FHead , there is a question on a HLT-DQM sequence for HIon. Do you know who could provide feedback to @kjpena ?

(cross-posted..)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let me tag relevant HI tracking and HLT people @abaty @CesarBernardes @denerslemos to see if they have inputs

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@abaty @CesarBernardes @denerslemos

Do you have any inputs?

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry for the delay. Since pA is similar to pp, I think would be good to include trackEfficiencyMonitoringClientHLT in HLTMonitoringClientPA. Thanks

Copy link
Contributor Author

@kjpena kjpena Aug 5, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the input @denerslemos I will go ahead and update the HLTMonitoringClientPA

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@denerslemos, please note that HI sequences will not be updated in this PR, as discussed below. If needed, we can follow up with a separate PR

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@kjpena, ok, thank you so much for the efforts. I think it's a great idea to follow up using a separate PR.

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Aug 3, 2022

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 3, 2022

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6d9eb9/26625/summary.html
COMMIT: 48c09da
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_5_X_2022-08-03-1100/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/38959/26625/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 2 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 51
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3691510
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 8
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3691480
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 50 files compared)
  • Checked 212 log files, 49 edm output root files, 51 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Aug 5, 2022

Thanks @kjpena, would you mind preparing a backport for 12.4.x for this PR (that would be ~ urgent)?
I think the discussion about HI sequences that unfortunately landed here #38959 (comment)
won't become relevant until several months.
Thanks!

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 5, 2022

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-38959/31429

  • This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 5, 2022

Pull request #38959 was updated. @emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @pmandrik, @micsucmed, @rvenditti can you please check and sign again.

HLTMonitoringClient = cms.Sequence(trackingMonitorClientHLT * trackingForDisplacedJetMonitorClientHLT)
HLTMonitoringClientPA= cms.Sequence(trackingMonitorClientHLT * PAtrackingMonitorClientHLT)
HLTMonitoringClient = cms.Sequence(trackingMonitorClientHLT * trackEfficiencyMonitoringClientHLT * trackingForDisplacedJetMonitorClientHLT)
HLTMonitoringClientPA= cms.Sequence(trackingMonitorClientHLT * trackEfficiencyMonitoringClientHLT * PAtrackingMonitorClientHLT)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think one would also have to add hltToOfflineTrackValidatorSequence to OfflineHLTMonitoringPA in order to produce the histograms used by trackEfficiencyMonitoringClientHLT in HLTMonitoringClientPA.

In any case, since this PR is now considered urgent (#38959 (comment)), feel free to postpone HIon-related updates.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes. In fact, one would need a dedicated sequence, similar to hltToOfflineTrackValidatorSequence but with the collections that need to be monitored in the Heavy-Ions scenario. I would indeed suggest to leave these changes for a separate PR, either by or with further input from Heavy-Ions experts

@emanueleusai
Copy link
Member

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 6, 2022

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6d9eb9/26671/summary.html
COMMIT: a7fed5e
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_5_X_2022-08-05-2300/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/38959/26671/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 51
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3691612
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 2
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3691588
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 50 files compared)
  • Checked 212 log files, 49 edm output root files, 51 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Aug 8, 2022

urgent

@cmsbuild cmsbuild added the urgent label Aug 8, 2022
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 8, 2022

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6d9eb9/26711/summary.html
COMMIT: 48c09da
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_5_X_2022-08-08-1100/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/38959/26711/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 8 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 51
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3691612
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 14
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3691576
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 50 files compared)
  • Checked 212 log files, 49 edm output root files, 51 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@emanueleusai
Copy link
Member

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Aug 10, 2022

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 4c7b44b into cms-sw:master Aug 10, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants