Phase2-hgx318A Use the correct ERA for 2026D94 scenario

[bsunanda]

PR description:

Use the correct ERA for 2026D94 scenario

PR validation:

Use the runTheMatrix test workflow 41834 to check if Digi's and RecHit's for HFNose are there

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

Nothing special

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-38846/31234

• This PR adds an extra 32KB to repository

• There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:

  • File Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/upgradeWorkflowComponents.py modified in PR(s): Update BeamSpot in Run3 MC GTs + swap Run3RoundOptics25ns13TeVLowSigmaZ with Realistic25ns13p6TeVEarly2022Collision vtx smearing #38760, Add NANO step and Mini+Nano validations to FastSim workflows #38834, Clean up Phase-2 geometry (Up to D85) #38702, Add run3 tracking low pu era #33532
  • File Configuration/StandardSequences/python/Eras.py modified in PR(s): [PPS] Direct simulation as sequence #38280, 122nano and boosted tau #38842, Add run3 tracking low pu era #33532, fix dump of nano + add modifier for 122 mini #38749

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda (Sunanda Banerjee) for master.

It involves the following packages:

• Configuration/Eras (operations)
• Configuration/PyReleaseValidation (pdmv, upgrade)
• Configuration/StandardSequences (operations)

@perrotta, @rappoccio, @jordan-martins, @bbilin, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @kskovpen, @qliphy, @fabiocos, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@fabiocos, @VourMa, @makortel, @felicepantaleo, @slomeo, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @JanFSchulte, @rovere, @VinInn, @Martin-Grunewald, @missirol, @kpedro88, @lecriste, @trtomei, @mmusich, @mtosi, @beaucero, @dgulhan this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[bsunanda]

@cmsbuild Please test

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6f0a9d/26422/summary.html
COMMIT: b38d83d
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_5_X_2022-07-23-1100/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/38846/26422/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 51
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3667670
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 8
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3667640
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 50 files compared)
• Checked 210 log files, 47 edm output root files, 51 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[srimanob]

test parameters:

• workflow = 41834.0

[srimanob]

@cmsbuild please test

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6f0a9d/26469/summary.html
COMMIT: b38d83d
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_5_X_2022-07-26-1100/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/38846/26469/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

• /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-6f0a9d/41834.0_TTbar_14TeV+2026D94+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSimHLBeamSpot14+DigiTrigger+RecoGlobal+HARVESTGlobal

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 52
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3770896
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 38718
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 5
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3732151
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 51 files compared)
• Checked 214 log files, 47 edm output root files, 52 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[srimanob]

I've confused a bit on @cmsbuild report, 41834.0 is reported as comparison was not done due to missing matrix map. However, the failure histogram comes from this workflow. Do I remember correctly that if there is no workflow for comparison, the reference is built now.

[srimanob]

+Upgrade

D94 workflow runs. Change should be expected from the correction of Era.

[makortel]

41834.0 is reported as comparison was not done due to missing matrix map

IIUC the message

comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

• /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-6f0a9d/41834.0_TTbar_14TeV+2026D94+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSimHLBeamSpot14+DigiTrigger+RecoGlobal+HARVESTGlobal

means that the 41834.0 is not used for the RECO comparisons (validateJR). It is used for everything else (like RelMon from DQM histograms).

Do I remember correctly that if there is no workflow for comparison, the reference is built now.

Correct.

[kskovpen]

+pdmv

[perrotta]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will be automatically merged.