Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't save flat nano in the ECAL ALCANANO wf #38510

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 27, 2022

Conversation

tvami
Copy link
Contributor

@tvami tvami commented Jun 26, 2022

PR description:

Temporary solution to resolve the problems in dmwm/T0#4664
In the future, the ECAL experts will introduce another customization function that keeps the save_flatnano flag true, but for the T0 it needs to be False (given that T0 can deal with the EDM version of NANO only). Because of that I remove the output definition from the current ECAL ALCANANO customization.

PR validation:

runTheMatrix.py -l 139.005

runs fine

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

Not a backport, we could consider backporting it to 12_4_X

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor Author

tvami commented Jun 26, 2022

type ecal

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor Author

tvami commented Jun 26, 2022

urgent

  • we should have this in the next 12_5_X_pre

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor Author

tvami commented Jun 26, 2022

test parameters:

  • workflows = 139.005

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor Author

tvami commented Jun 26, 2022

atn @simonepigazzini

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor Author

tvami commented Jun 26, 2022

@cmsbuild , please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-38510/30740

  • This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @tvami (Tamas Vami) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • Calibration/EcalCalibAlgos (alca)

@malbouis, @tvami, @yuanchao, @francescobrivio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@rchatter, @tocheng, @argiro, @thomreis, @simonepigazzini, @mmusich, @ChrisMisan this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@simonepigazzini
Copy link
Contributor

ok for me. I will add the other customize function in a separate PR later on.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Failed Tests: RelVals RelVals-INPUT
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-19e517/25805/summary.html
COMMIT: 9b140d1
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_5_X_2022-06-26-0000/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/38510/25805/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-19e517/25805/git-recent-commits.json
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-19e517/25805/git-merge-result

RelVals

  • 139.005139.005_AlCaPhiSym2021+AlCaPhiSym2021+RECOALCAECALPHISYMDR3+ALCAECALPHISYM/step2_AlCaPhiSym2021+AlCaPhiSym2021+RECOALCAECALPHISYMDR3+ALCAECALPHISYM.log

RelVals-INPUT

  • 139.005139.005_AlCaPhiSym2021+AlCaPhiSym2021+RECOALCAECALPHISYMDR3+ALCAECALPHISYM/step2_AlCaPhiSym2021+AlCaPhiSym2021+RECOALCAECALPHISYMDR3+ALCAECALPHISYM.log

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor Author

tvami commented Jun 26, 2022

@cmsbuild , please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-38510/30742

  • This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #38510 was updated. @malbouis, @tvami, @yuanchao, @francescobrivio can you please check and sign again.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-19e517/25810/summary.html
COMMIT: 8e3b829
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_5_X_2022-06-26-0000/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/38510/25810/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-19e517/25810/git-recent-commits.json
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-19e517/25810/git-merge-result

Comparison Summary

There are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline:
39634.9 step 4
The results for the comparisons for these workflows could be incomplete
This means most likely that the IB is having errors in the relvals.The error does NOT come from this pull request

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-19e517/139.005_AlCaPhiSym2021+AlCaPhiSym2021+RECOALCAECALPHISYMDR3+ALCAECALPHISYM

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 11201 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 50
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3659995
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 6452
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 4
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3653517
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: -0.035 KiB( 49 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 138.4 ): -0.008 KiB JetMET/SUSYDQM
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 138.5 ): -0.004 KiB JetMET/SUSYDQM
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 4.53 ): -0.023 KiB JetMET/SUSYDQM
  • Checked 211 log files, 45 edm output root files, 50 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: found differences in 3 / 49 workflows

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor Author

tvami commented Jun 26, 2022

+alca

  • tests pass, ECAL is in agreement with the proposed change

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Jun 27, 2022

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants