-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Don't save flat nano in the ECAL ALCANANO wf #38510
Conversation
type ecal |
urgent
|
test parameters:
|
atn @simonepigazzini |
@cmsbuild , please test |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-38510/30740
|
A new Pull Request was created by @tvami (Tamas Vami) for master. It involves the following packages:
@malbouis, @tvami, @yuanchao, @francescobrivio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
ok for me. I will add the other customize function in a separate PR later on. |
9b140d1
to
8e3b829
Compare
@cmsbuild , please test |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-38510/30742
|
Pull request #38510 was updated. @malbouis, @tvami, @yuanchao, @francescobrivio can you please check and sign again. |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-19e517/25810/summary.html The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: Comparison SummaryThere are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline: @slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
+alca
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Temporary solution to resolve the problems in dmwm/T0#4664
In the future, the ECAL experts will introduce another customization function that keeps the
save_flatnano
flag true, but for the T0 it needs to be False (given that T0 can deal with the EDM version of NANO only). Because of that I remove the output definition from the current ECAL ALCANANO customization.PR validation:
runs fine
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
Not a backport, we could consider backporting it to 12_4_X