Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Drop tracker geometries T22,T23,T27,T28 - first commit #37874

Merged

Conversation

emiglior
Copy link
Contributor

@emiglior emiglior commented May 9, 2022

PR description:

This PR concerns Upgrade.

This PR removes the phase-2 Tracker geometries T22, T23, T27 T28 definitively discarded after the choice of the Inner Tracker layout

ref. https://indico.cern.ch/event/1154888/contributions/4849182/attachments/2434145/4168775/news20220429.pdf slide 3

The PR removes both the geometry files and the corresponding workflows.
Furthermore, as T27 geometry is removed, the GT for geometries with bricked pixels is now 'phase2_realistic_T29'

The file
Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/upgradeWorkflowComponents.py
is also changed in order to preserve the workflow numbers.

Geometries for which large PU200 samples were produced
https://its.cern.ch/jira/browse/PDMVMCPROD-30
are still kept.

No changes are expected in the output for the geometries/workflows which are kept.

PR validation:

The PR was validated with runTheMatrix checking that

  • w/f numbers for geometries from 2026D76 to 2026D90 did not change
  • running explicitely the w/f 36600.0 (2026D81) 39400.0 (2026D88) 40200.0 (2026D90)

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

This PR is not a backport

@adewit @connorpa @mmusich @tsusa @tvami FYI

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 9, 2022

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37874/29846

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 9, 2022

A new Pull Request was created by @emiglior (Ernesto Migliore) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • Configuration/AlCa (alca)
  • Configuration/Eras (operations)
  • Configuration/Geometry (geometry, upgrade)
  • Configuration/PyReleaseValidation (pdmv, upgrade)
  • Configuration/StandardSequences (operations)
  • Geometry/CMSCommonData (geometry, upgrade)
  • Geometry/TrackerCommonData (geometry)

@perrotta, @malbouis, @civanch, @yuanchao, @jordan-martins, @makortel, @cvuosalo, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @tvami, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @Dr15Jones, @kskovpen, @bbilin, @qliphy, @francescobrivio, @fabiocos, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@felicepantaleo, @kpedro88, @ghugo83, @Martin-Grunewald, @bsunanda, @trtomei, @mmusich, @slomeo, @venturia, @vargasa, @makortel, @JanFSchulte, @dgulhan, @missirol, @beaucero, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @rovere, @VinInn, @tocheng, @ebrondol, @mtosi, @fabiocos, @lecriste this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented May 9, 2022

@cmsbuild , please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-7b6106/24553/summary.html
COMMIT: 0017685
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_4_X_2022-05-09-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/37874/24553/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 6 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3696633
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 14
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3696597
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 48 files compared)
  • Checked 206 log files, 45 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented May 10, 2022

+alca

  • PR drops Phase-2 tk geometries, the symbolic GT changes accordingly
  • Jenkins tests pass, differences are known

@cvuosalo
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

+Upgrade

This PR removes the unused tracker after decision was made on the inner tracker. No change is expected from the PR test as removed workflow has not been used for the short matrix. PR reserves the workflow number as expected.

@kskovpen
Copy link
Contributor

+pdmv

'T25' : ( ','.join( [ 'SiPixelSimLorentzAngle_phase2_T25_v0_mc' ,SiPixelSimLARecord,connectionString, "", "2021-03-16 20:00:00.000"] ), ), #uH = 0.053/T (TBPX L2,L3,L4), uH=0.0/T (TBPX L1 TEPX+TFPX)
'T26' : ( ','.join( [ 'SiPixelSimLorentzAngle_phase2_T25_v0_mc' ,SiPixelSimLARecord,connectionString, "", "2021-03-16 20:00:00.000"] ), ), #uH = 0.053/T (TBPX L2,L3,L4), uH=0.0/T (TBPX L1 TEPX+TFPX)
'T27' : ( ','.join( [ 'SiPixelSimLorentzAngle_phase2_T25_v0_mc' ,SiPixelSimLARecord,connectionString, "", "2021-03-16 20:00:00.000"] ), ), #uH = 0.053/T (TBPX L2,L3,L4), uH=0.0/T (TBPX L1 TEPX+TFPX)
'T29' : ( ','.join( [ 'SiPixelSimLorentzAngle_phase2_T25_v0_mc' ,SiPixelSimLARecord,connectionString, "", "2021-03-16 20:00:00.000"] ), ), #uH = 0.053/T (TBPX L2,L3,L4), uH=0.0/T (TBPX L1 TEPX+TFPX)
'T30' : ( ','.join( [ 'SiPixelSimLorentzAngle_phase2_IT_v6.4.0_25x100_v1_mc' ,SiPixelSimLARecord,connectionString, "", "2021-12-03 16:00:00.000"] ), ), #uH = 0.053/T (TBPX), uH=0.0/T (TEPX+TFPX)
}

allTags["GenError"] = {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just to check that nothing escaped: isn't "T29" needed for allTags["GenError"] and allTags["Template"]

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As T29 has few TBPX modules with bricked planar pixels, there are no 'GenError' nor 'Template' payloads for this geometry.

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

@emiglior if this is the "first commit", what we should expect from the "second" one? Aren't geometries T22,T23,T27,T28 already fully dropped with this PR?

@emiglior
Copy link
Contributor Author

@emiglior if this is the "first commit", what we should expect from the "second" one? Aren't geometries T22,T23,T27,T28 already fully dropped with this PR?

@perrotta Indeed T22,T23,T27,T28 are fully dropped with this PR.
"first commit" it is a bad wording in the commit message... just to express that I was not confident that one iteration was enough

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will be automatically merged.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants