-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Drop tracker geometries T22,T23,T27,T28 - first commit #37874
Drop tracker geometries T22,T23,T27,T28 - first commit #37874
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37874/29846
|
A new Pull Request was created by @emiglior (Ernesto Migliore) for master. It involves the following packages:
@perrotta, @malbouis, @civanch, @yuanchao, @jordan-martins, @makortel, @cvuosalo, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @tvami, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @Dr15Jones, @kskovpen, @bbilin, @qliphy, @francescobrivio, @fabiocos, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild , please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-7b6106/24553/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+alca
|
+1 |
+Upgrade This PR removes the unused tracker after decision was made on the inner tracker. No change is expected from the PR test as removed workflow has not been used for the short matrix. PR reserves the workflow number as expected. |
+pdmv |
'T25' : ( ','.join( [ 'SiPixelSimLorentzAngle_phase2_T25_v0_mc' ,SiPixelSimLARecord,connectionString, "", "2021-03-16 20:00:00.000"] ), ), #uH = 0.053/T (TBPX L2,L3,L4), uH=0.0/T (TBPX L1 TEPX+TFPX) | ||
'T26' : ( ','.join( [ 'SiPixelSimLorentzAngle_phase2_T25_v0_mc' ,SiPixelSimLARecord,connectionString, "", "2021-03-16 20:00:00.000"] ), ), #uH = 0.053/T (TBPX L2,L3,L4), uH=0.0/T (TBPX L1 TEPX+TFPX) | ||
'T27' : ( ','.join( [ 'SiPixelSimLorentzAngle_phase2_T25_v0_mc' ,SiPixelSimLARecord,connectionString, "", "2021-03-16 20:00:00.000"] ), ), #uH = 0.053/T (TBPX L2,L3,L4), uH=0.0/T (TBPX L1 TEPX+TFPX) | ||
'T29' : ( ','.join( [ 'SiPixelSimLorentzAngle_phase2_T25_v0_mc' ,SiPixelSimLARecord,connectionString, "", "2021-03-16 20:00:00.000"] ), ), #uH = 0.053/T (TBPX L2,L3,L4), uH=0.0/T (TBPX L1 TEPX+TFPX) | ||
'T30' : ( ','.join( [ 'SiPixelSimLorentzAngle_phase2_IT_v6.4.0_25x100_v1_mc' ,SiPixelSimLARecord,connectionString, "", "2021-12-03 16:00:00.000"] ), ), #uH = 0.053/T (TBPX), uH=0.0/T (TEPX+TFPX) | ||
} | ||
|
||
allTags["GenError"] = { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just to check that nothing escaped: isn't "T29" needed for allTags["GenError"]
and allTags["Template"]
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As T29 has few TBPX modules with bricked planar pixels, there are no 'GenError' nor 'Template' payloads for this geometry.
@emiglior if this is the "first commit", what we should expect from the "second" one? Aren't geometries T22,T23,T27,T28 already fully dropped with this PR? |
@perrotta Indeed T22,T23,T27,T28 are fully dropped with this PR. |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will be automatically merged. |
PR description:
This PR concerns Upgrade.
This PR removes the phase-2 Tracker geometries T22, T23, T27 T28 definitively discarded after the choice of the Inner Tracker layout
ref. https://indico.cern.ch/event/1154888/contributions/4849182/attachments/2434145/4168775/news20220429.pdf slide 3
The PR removes both the geometry files and the corresponding workflows.
Furthermore, as T27 geometry is removed, the GT for geometries with bricked pixels is now 'phase2_realistic_T29'
The file
Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/upgradeWorkflowComponents.py
is also changed in order to preserve the workflow numbers.
Geometries for which large PU200 samples were produced
https://its.cern.ch/jira/browse/PDMVMCPROD-30
are still kept.
No changes are expected in the output for the geometries/workflows which are kept.
PR validation:
The PR was validated with runTheMatrix checking that
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
This PR is not a backport
@adewit @connorpa @mmusich @tsusa @tvami FYI