Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Phase2 tracker cabling map: add IT cabling map #36333

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 4, 2021

Conversation

adewit
Copy link
Contributor

@adewit adewit commented Dec 2, 2021

PR description:

This adds the IT cabling map for the Phase 2 tracker to the cabling map producer. Requires the updated input data here: cms-data/CondTools-SiPhase2Tracker#3

With this change we also read the lpGBT IDs from the external file for the OT, rather than automatically assigning them as was done before.

PR validation:

Checked that the new map does not change the detID<>DTC links for OT compared with the version currently in the GTs (TrackerDetToDTCELinkCablingMap__OT616_200_IT613__T14__OTOnly), and that the IT information is also picked up correctly.

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

Not a backport

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 2, 2021

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36333/27078

  • This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 2, 2021

A new Pull Request was created by @adewit for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • CondTools/SiPhase2Tracker (upgrade, alca)

@malbouis, @yuanchao, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @tvami, @francescobrivio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mmusich, @tocheng, @VinInn this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Dec 2, 2021

@cmsbuild, please test with cms-data/CondTools-SiPhase2Tracker#3

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 2, 2021

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-5e42ec/20931/summary.html
COMMIT: 9c29b74
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_2_X_2021-12-01-2300/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/36333/20931/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 17245 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 41
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3041955
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 23355
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3018578
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 40 files compared)
  • Checked 175 log files, 37 edm output root files, 41 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Dec 2, 2021

Naively I would have expected to see changes in Phase-2 only, but 2017 and 2018 wf-s show big differences (in tracking vertexing, b-tagging). Is this expected? @adewit

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Dec 2, 2021

Naively I would have expected to see changes in Phase-2 only, but 2017 and 2018 wf-s show big differences (in tracking vertexing, b-tagging). Is this expected?

No changes are expected anywhere. Clearly something got screwed with the comparison.

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Dec 2, 2021

@cmsbuild, please test with cms-data/CondTools-SiPhase2Tracker#3

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Dec 2, 2021

@cmsbuild, please test with cms-data/CondTools-SiPhase2Tracker#3

I hope this will pick up the 1100 IB

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 2, 2021

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-5e42ec/20945/summary.html
COMMIT: 9c29b74
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_2_X_2021-12-02-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/36333/20945/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 41
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3041955
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3041933
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 40 files compared)
  • Checked 175 log files, 37 edm output root files, 41 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Dec 2, 2021

Now this looks good!

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Dec 2, 2021

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

srimanob commented Dec 3, 2021

+Upgrade

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 3, 2021

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Dec 4, 2021

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants