-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Phase2 tracker cabling map: add IT cabling map #36333
Conversation
…g in output db name
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36333/27078
|
A new Pull Request was created by @adewit for master. It involves the following packages:
@malbouis, @yuanchao, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @tvami, @francescobrivio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild, please test with cms-data/CondTools-SiPhase2Tracker#3 |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-5e42ec/20931/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
Naively I would have expected to see changes in Phase-2 only, but 2017 and 2018 wf-s show big differences (in tracking vertexing, b-tagging). Is this expected? @adewit |
No changes are expected anywhere. Clearly something got screwed with the comparison. |
@cmsbuild, please test with cms-data/CondTools-SiPhase2Tracker#3 |
I hope this will pick up the 1100 IB |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-5e42ec/20945/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
Now this looks good! |
+alca
|
+Upgrade |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
This adds the IT cabling map for the Phase 2 tracker to the cabling map producer. Requires the updated input data here: cms-data/CondTools-SiPhase2Tracker#3
With this change we also read the lpGBT IDs from the external file for the OT, rather than automatically assigning them as was done before.
PR validation:
Checked that the new map does not change the detID<>DTC links for OT compared with the version currently in the GTs (TrackerDetToDTCELinkCablingMap__OT616_200_IT613__T14__OTOnly), and that the IT information is also picked up correctly.
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
Not a backport