-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[EGM HLT] Phase out calotower & use HCAL recHits directly #35049
Conversation
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35049/24921
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35049/24922
|
A new Pull Request was created by @swagata87 (Swagata Mukherjee) for master. It involves the following packages:
@Martin-Grunewald, @cmsbuild can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a150a0/18126/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
desc.add<bool>(("useSingleTower"), false); | ||
desc.add<std::vector<double> >("effectiveAreas", {0.079, 0.25}); // 2016 post-ichep sinEle default | ||
desc.add<std::vector<double> >("absEtaLowEdges", {0.0, 1.479}); // Barrel, Endcap | ||
descriptions.add(("hltEgammaHLTHcalVarProducerFromRecHit"), desc); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is there an extra bracket-pair around the first argument?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah I just copied from other .cc files in that folder.. but you are right that these extra braces are not needed.
Let me remove them and update the PR. Thanks!
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35049/24981
|
Pull request #35049 was updated. @Martin-Grunewald, @cmsbuild can you please check and sign again. |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a150a0/18184/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
This PR adds a new HLT producer which uses HBHE recHits directly to produce H for H/E and HCAL isolation of e/gamma objects. The old producer, which used calotowers to produce those variables, will still be available. This change in HLT is a follow up of what has already been done in offline e/gamma by @afiqaize in
PR: #33666
relevant HN post: https://hypernews.cern.ch/HyperNews/CMS/get/egamma/2475.html
PR validation:
Ran e/gamma HLT including the new producer.
Relevant config (to produce single HCAL tower based H for H/E):
Then compared it with results obtained from old producer; by running on
1)DY events
2)QCD(Pt>600 GeV) events
Note that an exact match is not expected, as the calotower creation logic is slightly different than what we are doing here with recHits directly.
This PR is not a backport.
Backport is not needed.