-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
adjust cp5 cr fragments to compensate P8.240 changes #32319
Conversation
assign generators |
please test |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-32319/20150
|
The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
|
A new Pull Request was created by @agrohsje for master. It involves the following packages: Configuration/Generator @SiewYan, @mkirsano, @cmsbuild, @GurpreetSinghChahal, @agrohsje, @alberto-sanchez can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
-1 Tested at: 5bd8219 CMSSW: CMSSW_11_3_X_2020-11-27-1100 The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: You can see the results of the tests here: I found follow errors while testing this PR Failed tests: RelVals
When I ran the RelVals I found an error in the following workflows: runTheMatrix-results/11624.911_TTbar_13+2021_DD4hep+TTbar_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_GenSim+Digi+Reco+HARVEST+ALCA/step1_TTbar_13+2021_DD4hep+TTbar_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_GenSim+Digi+Reco+HARVEST+ALCA.log The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: |
Comparison not run due to runTheMatrix errors (RelVals and Igprof tests were also skipped) |
Hi @silviodonato, @qliphy. How should I proceed? The segmentation violation is not related to my PR. I just add some P8 specification to fragments that are not even used here. |
please test with #32313 |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
|
+1 |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready There are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline: Comparison Summary:
|
Hi @qliphy. Do you mind double-checking, then I sign off? |
urgent |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
P8.240 required changes in the CPx tune fragment. these were already done in this PR:
51db35e#diff-c1a2292179da27b1385f4602a3b7459a8026b7992b84c77241fe3bb284545ee1
but the CR1 and CR2 fragments were not included. Settings now updated to be in sync with the CP5 default.
PR validation:
validation can be found in the talk by Sercan:
https://indico.cern.ch/event/783789/contributions/3364815/attachments/1822138/2980824/2019_Apr2_Pythia8-240_and_PDF.pdf
no available workflow with this special fragment available