-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Change track muon dataformats scouting #31962
Change track muon dataformats scouting #31962
Conversation
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-31962/19418
|
A new Pull Request was created by @jsalfeld (Jakob Salfeld-Nebgen) for master. It involves the following packages: DataFormats/Scouting @smuzaffar, @Dr15Jones, @makortel, @cmsbuild, @Martin-Grunewald, @fwyzard can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
|
-1 Tested at: 641854b CMSSW: CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-10-27-2300 I found follow errors while testing this PR Failed tests: ClangBuild
I found compilation warning while trying to compile with clang. Command used:
See details on the summary page. |
Comparison not run due to Build errors/Fireworks only changes/No short matrix requested (RelVals and Igprof tests were also skipped) |
Important, thanks for finding it! I will update |
const edm::EDGetTokenT<reco::VertexCollection> vertexCollection_; | ||
|
||
const int mantissaPrecision; | ||
const int vtxMinDist; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
const int vtxMinDist; | |
const float vtxMinDist; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ah here I now took "const double vtxMinDist", following same type for "vtxMinDist" in Line 59 and 144. Shall I take float?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the difference is negligible.
: otherTrackCollection_(consumes<reco::TrackCollection>(iConfig.getParameter<edm::InputTag>("OtherTracks"))), | ||
vertexCollection_(consumes<reco::VertexCollection>(iConfig.getParameter<edm::InputTag>("vertexCollection"))), | ||
mantissaPrecision(iConfig.getParameter<int>("mantissaPrecision")), | ||
vtxMinDist(iConfig.getParameter<int>("vtxMinDist")) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
vtxMinDist(iConfig.getParameter<int>("vtxMinDist")) { | |
vtxMinDist(iConfig.getParameter<double>("vtxMinDist")) { |
desc.add<edm::InputTag>("vertexCollection", edm::InputTag("hltPixelVertices")); | ||
|
||
desc.add<int>("mantissaPrecision", 23); | ||
desc.add<int>("vtxMinDist", 0.01); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
desc.add<int>("vtxMinDist", 0.01); | |
desc.add<double>("vtxMinDist", 0.01); |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
urgent |
please integrate in 11.2.0-pre10 |
+1 |
PR description:
-- For the upcoming Scouting Sample Production Campaign, added covariance matrix elements to scouting tracks and muons. This will allow vertex fitting after data taking. Also made a quick hltPixelVertex to hltPixelTrack association and introduced the vertex index in the corresponding collection.
-- while I introduced an option of reducing relevant bits to store information, the scouting track collection will need significant storage space and we will need to double check in the next iteration what exactly will be needed
--->
cmssw/DataFormats/TrackReco/interface/TrackBase.h
Line 5 in 3c9bd1b
Indicates roughly 20 parameters are needed
observations:
-- about on average 2-3% of the tracks are incorrectly associated to vertices via the method of minimising dz^2 - this is measured on ttbar events with roughly 600 tracks per event. (the vertices are only clustered in Z)
-- all tracks in the associated track collection of vertices, are quadruplets
-- not all quadruplets are in the list of tracks associated to vertices
-- via the matching performed in this producer, all tracks (triplets & quadruplets) will be matched to vertices if dxy^2+dz^2 < 0.015.
PR validation:
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
scram b distclean
git cms-checkdeps -a -A
scram b -j 8
scram b runtests
scram build code-checks
scram build code-format