Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Trackjets as seeds of JetPlusTrack at RECO and MINIAOD #30430

Conversation

kodolova
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

Improved efficiency for low Pt jets via TrackJets seeding. Possibility to rereconstructed with MiniAOD objects.
PR description:

Presented at Reconstruction meeting
https://indico.cern.ch/event/923095/
PR validation:

Tests are performed according:https://cms-sw.github.io/PRWorkflow.html
Result of runTheMatrix test is in:
/afs/cern.ch/work/k/kodolova/public/HMUMUBB/CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-06-10-2300/src/TEST

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

Before submitting your pull requests, make sure you followed this checklist:

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@kodolova
Copy link
Contributor Author

I was forced to create the new PR as I got for 30188:
hint: Updates were rejected because the tip of your current branch is behind
hint: its remote counterpart. Integrate the remote changes (e.g.
hint: 'git pull ...') before pushing again.
hint: See the 'Note about fast-forwards' in 'git push --help' for details.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-30430/16525

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Jun 26, 2020

hint: Updates were rejected because the tip of your current branch is behind

you can git push --force when it's clear what's been done. (the existing/old PR needs to be in an open state for this to work)
It would be easier to stay in the original PR to keep track of the comments from the previous review round.

@kodolova
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ok, I will try to do

@kodolova
Copy link
Contributor Author

I succeeded with --force option. Thus, what I should do? I have two identical PR: 30188 and 30430... We have to keep one of them.
Please, advice.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Jun 26, 2020

I succeeded with --force option. Thus, what I should do? I have two identical PR: 30188 and 30430... We have to keep one of them.
Please, advice.

I'm not sure about the meaning of "identical"

My moderate preference is to have #30188 reopened and its branch updated instead of advancing to this PR.

@kodolova
Copy link
Contributor Author

That's ok. The problem is that I do not know how to reopen... I push the button at the bottom of the page but who knows what it is doing...

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Jun 26, 2020

if you force-pushed to the branch of #30188 (kodolova:JPT_TrackJetsSeedReco_PATrereco_11_2_Xbased) before reopening, then the PR is locked out and I've seen the "reopen" button stop working.

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Jun 26, 2020

if you force-pushed to the branch of #30188 (kodolova:JPT_TrackJetsSeedReco_PATrereco_11_2_Xbased) before reopening, then the PR is locked out and I've seen the "reopen" button stop working.

it's not a huge deal, I can continue the review in this PR.

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Jun 26, 2020

code-checks

trying manually, it looks like the automated attempt from 2 hours ago got stuck
#30430 (comment)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-30430/16533

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @kodolova (kodolova) for master.

It involves the following packages:

CommonTools/RecoAlgos
RecoJets/JetPlusTracks

@perrotta, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@rappoccio, @jdolen, @ahinzmann, @riga, @abbiendi, @jhgoh, @jdamgov, @makortel, @nhanvtran, @gkasieczka, @clelange, @hatakeyamak, @schoef, @mariadalfonso, @seemasharmafnal this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Jun 26, 2020

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 26, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 5, 2020

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 5, 2020

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-30430/17570

  • This PR adds an extra 140KB to repository

  • Found files with invalid states:

    • RecoJets/JetPlusTracks/plugins/JetPlusTrackAddonSeedProducer.h:
    • RecoJets/JetPlusTracks/plugins/JetPlusTrackProducer.cc.rej:
    • CommonTools/RecoAlgos/python/trackFromPackedCandidateProducer_cfi.py:
    • RecoJets/JetPlusTracks/plugins/TrackFromPFProducer.cc:
    • RecoJets/JetPlusTracks/plugins/JetPlusTrackProducer.h.rej:
    • RecoJets/JetPlusTracks/plugins/TrackFromPFProducer.h:
    • RecoJets/JetPlusTracks/python/jetPlusTrackAddonSeedProducer_cfi.py:
    • RecoJets/JetPlusTracks/plugins/JetPlusTrackProducer.cc.orig:
    • RecoJets/JetPlusTracks/plugins/JetPlusTrackProducer.h.orig:

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 5, 2020

Pull request #30430 was updated. @perrotta, @jpata, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please check and sign again.

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Aug 5, 2020

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 5, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 5, 2020

+1
Tested at: aa78787
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e82886/8580/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-08-04-2300
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 5, 2020

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 5, 2020

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e82886/8580/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • ROOTFileChecks: Some differences in event products or their sizes found
  • Reco comparison results: 151 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 35
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2612401
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2612352
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 48
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 34 files compared)
  • Checked 149 log files, 22 edm output root files, 35 DQM output files

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Aug 6, 2020

@jfernan2 @ahinzmann @lathomas @kirschen
please take a note that we may need to re-enable the JPT jet monitoring in DQM.
It seems like it was lost after the AK5 -> AK4 migration a while back.

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Aug 6, 2020

+1

for #30430 aa78787

  • code changes are in line with the PR description and the follow up review
    • somewhat small changes in physics are expected for regular reco, only at lower pt JPT jets where the track jets can contribute in a less correlated way than calojetes already used for seeding
    • the setup of running on (or in) miniAOD is working with a test config and will stay "experimental"/analysis-only for some time
  • jenkins tests pass and comparisons with the baseline show differences only in JPT jets

e.g. in wf 136.874 in egamma 2018C PD
more jets appear in the lower energy part of the spectrum
all_OldVSNew_RunEGamma2018Cwf136p874c_log10recoJPTJets_JetPlusTrackZSPCorJetAntiKt4__reRECO_obj_energy

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 6, 2020

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants